Fantasy 1939: Ursula Moray Williams, Adventures of Puffin

Dustjacket of first edition, showing the Little Wo jumping from the pilot’s plane with Puffin in pursuit. Illustration by Mary Shillabeer.

Moray Williams’s most celebrated books, Adventures of the Little Wooden Horse (1938) and Gobbolino the Witch’s Cat (1942), take place in an imaginary location corresponding to somewhere in Northern Europe, an alternative Switzerland full of forests, mountains, woodcutters and itinerant toymakers who carve playthings lovingly from the wood of the trees that surround them. The Little Wooden Horse’s there-and-back-again journey takes him through industrial landscapes as well as rural ones, canal barges, cargo ships and coalmines as well as palaces and bourgeois houses, but it is coded as being set in the recent past; there are no trains or aeroplanes in it, and the toymaker who makes the Little Wooden Horse seems startled by the challenge posed to his trade by the mass-produced metal toys which were pretty well ubiquitous by 1938, when the book was first published. Gobbolino’s quest for a permanent home occupies a fairy tale panorama populated by witches, hobgoblins, knights and dragons, as well as more everyday beings: orphans, mayors, pedlars and farmers. The little cat’s quest for an ‘ordinary’ human family to take him in is represented as particularly difficult in a world with so many magical events and beings in it, where everyone thinks they know what to expect from a witch’s cat, and everyone assumes that Gobbolino is one of them – the prejudice is even consolidated in the book’s title (Gobbolino is never really a witch’s cat because he hasn’t got the looks or talent).

Adventures of Puffin, by contrast, takes place in contemporary Britain, beginning in the West Country of England – perhaps on Lundy Island, which is famous for puffins[1] – and taking in New York and London as well as the largest ship in the world, the recently-completed Queen Mary (launched in 1936), and the Coronation Scot express train (which ran for the first time in 1937). There are some terrifying mermaids, but the bulk of Puffin’s adventures have him confronting real-world perils. It’s as if the year of crisis 1939 found Moray Williams unable to tear her imagination away from the here and now; and the book’s double subject – marginalisation and helping outcasts and the homeless – could hardly have been more current. It’s a book about being lost, befriended, betrayed, and in a hurry. Those themes would have resonated with many of its readers, sometimes painfully so, and perhaps that’s why it never quite achieved the popularity of The Little Wooden Horse and Gobbolino.[2]

Puffin performing his signature song. Illustration by Mary Shillabeer.

The most striking feature of the book is its concentration on time, above all on being out of time. Its central character, a puffin called Puffin, finds himself at odds with mating season in his puffinry when he fails to find a mate – the only puffin not to have done so. He then comes across an egg, which fails to hatch when the other eggs do; Puffin’s meticulous care of the egg prevents him from following his fellow puffins when they return to their life at sea after the nesting season is over. He refuses to believe that the egg is no longer viable – that it has remained unhatched for far too long, and must therefore be lifeless – until he meets a lost toy called the Little Wo, and realises that he can no longer put off the time when he must help the toy find its owner. The quest for the Little Wo’s owner involves numerous occasions when the toy and his friend Puffin are trapped in some form of prison, prevented for extended periods from pursuing their journey – first in a mermaid’s cave, then in a coastguard’s cottage, where the Little Wo is tied to a baby’s wrist and Puffin is incarcerated in a bird cage. By the time they reach the location where the Little Wo was lost – a seaside town – it is out of season, and the family who lost him has long gone. The pair catch a train in the hope that it will take them to the family’s home in London, but fail to consult the timetable to ascertain its direction of travel, and find themselves trapped again in the cargo hold of a ship which is taking the train to America. Once in the United States they are imprisoned once more, this time in a capitalist contract whereby Puffin must sing his signature song and the Little Wo must perform magic tricks for an indefinite period – possibly for ever – without hope of release. Their eventual escape takes them back to the coastguard and his family, and eventually to London, where they narrowly escape being imprisoned for a fourth and final time in London Zoo. Each imprisonment in the book delays the pair’s journey for weeks or months, so that when the Little Wo finally finds his owner, Puffin returns to the puffinry to find that the nesting season is over again, and that he has again failed to choose a mate or fertilise an egg. The sheer consistency with which this theme is developed in the narrative confirms, I think, the extraordinary craftsmanship Moray Williams brings to her books for children, as noted in my post on The Little Wooden Horse. But it also confirms the extent to which this novel in particular represents a direct response to the year of peril, 1939, in which it was written.

The most striking sign that the book is a work of its time is its use of a highly topical incident as one of its central plot devices. Puffin and Little Wo conceal themselves in a train, as I said before, but it’s not just any train; it’s the ‘very paragon of trains’, which the Little Wo chooses in preference to the ordinary train that would (presumably) have taken them to London, their intended destination (p. 137). ‘Look at that one!’ the toy cries when he catches sight of it at the station. ‘Did you ever in all your life see such a glorious, such a magnificent train as the one that is standing over there?’ Puffin has not – in fact, Puffin has never even seen a train before – and so he agrees to board the vehicle in question, little knowing that it is the Coronation Scot, which is about to be taken to New York for display at the New York World Fair. The actual Coronation Scot was loaded on board the SS Belpamela at Southampton on 23 January 1939, and was described in a contemporary newsreel as ‘the pride of Britain’s railways, fast and silent and up-to-date’, sent to the United States to ‘show them what we can do in the way of modern transport’. The vehicle represents modernity itself, with the speed, efficiency and sleek art deco aesthetics that embodied the concept at the end of the decade. In the book, however, the train is out of time, for all its modernity. It is travelling not on its usual route between London and Glasgow but across the sea to an exhibition in the most famous of American cities – a departure from its timetable that directly interferes with the plans and hopes of Puffin and the Little Wo. In fact, the real Coronation Scot went on to embody the rupture of time that takes place on the outbreak of war, since hostilities between Britain and Germany meant that it could not be brought back to Britain until 1943. In the meantime, it served as an ‘Ambassador of British railways and as an example of British craftsmanship and technical achievement’ when it was shown for a second time at the New York World Fair of 1940. By that time part of its duties would be to remind neutral America of the ‘ties and contacts […] which have so long bound us in mutual interest’, as Lord Stamp of Shortlands put it in a contemporary pamphlet. Presumably Lord Stamp hoped it might also help to persuade the United States to throw in its lot with the train’s engineers and country, abandoning neutrality and recognising the need to be ‘belligerent’ against the Nazi menace. Adventures of Puffin may have had a similar ambassadorial purpose, since Adventures of the Little Wooden Horse saw equal success in Britain and America, a feat which Puffin’s publishers no doubt hoped to replicate with its adventurous successor.[3]

The Duchess of Hamilton locomotive, part of the Coronation Scot service sent to New York for the 1939 exhibition.

War is never mentioned in Moray Williams’s book, but its presence is everywhere if you look for it. The lost toy called the Little Wo, in particular, could be said to represent the innocent victims of war, people about whom Moray Williams would have known a great deal thanks to her father’s work as County Director for the Red Cross in Hampshire. Three years before the book was published, farmland at Moray Williams’s Hampshire home – a dilapidated mansion called North Stoneham – was chosen as the site for a camp for Basque refugee children from the Spanish Civil War;[4] in other words, war in Europe swept up on the shore of Ursula’s childhood home at the very moment when her marriage to a pilot took her away from Stoneham to a suburban flat in Hampton, exiling her from the countryside she loved. Ursula’s brother Alan, a communist, was inspired by the plight of the Basque refugees to write a pamphlet calling for insurrection which got him rusticated from the University of Cambridge. Like the refugees the Little Wo is a forced migrant, swept away from his child owner and banished from his home by the sea of circumstance. His strangely curtailed name seems to indicate the broken threads that tied him to the past; we’re told specifically at one point that ‘Wo’ is not a version of ‘Woe’ (p. 133), and readers of Moray Williams’s famous book of 1938 might well have noted its broken allusion to the book’s protagonist, the Little Wooden Horse. The Little Wo, however, doesn’t have a fixed species. While the illustrations by Mary Shillabeer suggest he is a dog, the book never names him as such, and from his first emergence from the sea he comes across as more or less anonymous as well as homeless and alone:

Out of the melting froth something crept and crawled, so wet it might have been made of the sea. […] The little creature was not a bird, it was not a seal, it was certainly not a mermaid – it was like nothing [Puffin] had ever seen before (p. 23).

We know only that the Little Wo has a name and that he’s made of cotton, with button eyes (p. 48), woolly ears and a tail ‘which had been darned several times over’ (p. 56). He cannot remember where his home is, and even his child owner has no name – he is only ever ‘Himself’. Everywhere he goes the toy seeks to endear himself to the local population, accepting them eagerly as his well-wishers and benefactors, despite the fact that they regularly prove to have malevolent designs on him. At the same time, from the first his chief characteristics are those of loyalty – first to Himself, then to Puffin, then to his real or apparent friends – along with courage (although he is often frightened), forgetfulness and naivety. By the end of the book, when he finally remembers the location of his home, these characteristics make him seem like the ideal candidate for a soldier, perhaps part of the worldwide movement preparing to protect their homes from the rise of fascism. On spotting the house where Himself lives, he promptly jumps out of a speeding plane with a parachute on his back – like a paratrooper or a pilot escaping a damaged aircraft – and sets off towards the building in question, ‘Confident as a marching army’ (p. 188), singing martial songs and ‘with a thousand imaginary drums beating in his ears’ (p. 189). The last Puffin sees of him is looking out of the house’s nursery window, waving to his avian friend and protector while preparing to reassure Himself (who is not at home) that his broken family has been reunited against all odds. There could hardly be a more comforting message for child readers in wartime – especially if those readers had been forcefully parted from their families and homes, like the Basque refugees. Reunion may still be possible, the book insists, and it happens here after many trials and adventures, though we are never shown the reunion itself. Every child who has been separated from their loved ones will need to imagine it for themselves.

Puffin with the Little Wo. Illustration by Mary Shillabeer.

The emphasis on technology in Moray Williams’s book also invokes the rapid approach of war, when innovative and skilfully-used technology might prove the difference between victory and defeat. Ursula’s husband Peter was an ex-RAF pilot who worked as a technician at the Hawker factory in Kingston, where the famous Hawker Hurricane fighter planes were built between 1936 and 1944. A major character in the novel is a young pilot who aims to break the record for crossing the Atlantic, and who befriends Puffin and the Little Wo at the seaside town where the toy was lost in the summer. The young man’s friendliness towards the friendless pair enables them to enter a grand hotel from which they have previously been barred, and they later accompany him on his record-breaking flight from New York to England. The pilot’s plane crashes on the English coast after breaking the record, but he goes on to build a second, improved model of the smashed plane – called the Butterfly as if in homage to the well-known Moth series of planes built by de Havilland, though the name also invokes the beauty and vulnerability of planes in the 1930s[5] – and it’s from the new aircraft that the Little Wo finally spots his long-lost home. The pilot’s attempt to break the record identifies speed and technological innovation as the key qualities of modern times, but his willingness to use them in the service of others – he is unconcerned with fame or the trappings of fame and does his best to avoid them – endows him with the additional qualities of empathy, selflessness and loyalty required by prospective defenders of freedom. The series of coincidences that ensure the book’s modest heroes meet up on three occasions with their pilot friend imply, too, that he is in some sense a man of his time, one whose ability to master time by flying swiftly somehow extends itself to a mastery of good timing.

The pilot’s personal modesty extends to his family background, since his mother lives in a ‘pleasant country cottage’ with a ‘homely parlour’ and expresses effusive gratitude to Puffin for ‘saving her son’s life on the rocks’ after the crash (pp. 163-4). In fact the young man is a human double of the book’s two central characters, with Puffin’s ability to fly, the Little Wo’s attachment to home, and the courage and ingenuity of both, so that his presence in Moray Williams’s novel helps to link the two small animals – one real, one a toy – to the human population of his country. He confirms the link between himself and his nonhuman friends when he tells the Little Wo that he understands his impatience to get back to his owner: ‘I know just how you feel,’ he tells him, since ‘I felt like that myself out there in the States waiting for the Butterfly to be ready’ (p. 164). The Little Wo’s urgency to get home and the pilot’s urgency to break the record in flying to England both pay homage to the love of your place of birth, and to a stubborn willingness to overcome the various forms of peril that threaten to sever you from that place for ever; in the final stage of the crossing a storm brings down the pilot’s plane, but between them the three friends show characteristic resilience in surviving the catastrophe and making it back to the people and localities they love. In Moray Williams’s world, in other words, technological innovation can supplement rather than obscure the attachment to place, family and the ordinary. As the wife of a pilot and technician she was well qualified to recognise the capacity of these things to coexist.

The pilot with Puffin and the Little Wo in the hotel dining room. Illustration by Mary Shillabeer.

Another element of the book that betrays its origins in the shadow of war is its setting on the English coast. The coast is where families go for holidays, where seabirds nest, where climbers brave the cliffs (Puffin and little Wo are rescued from a peregrine’s nest by a young climber, the Coastguard’s son), and where fishermen earn their living (Puffin salutes the fishermen of his home region as he flies back to his puffinry at the end of the book: ‘where are fishermen like the fishermen of the West Country?’, p. 194). But the seashore is also a place of deadly danger. The sea that washes against its rocks and sands contains perils of every description, from the tide that sweeps the Little Wo away from Himself to the peregrine that snatches him from the waves as food for its young, from the whirlpools between its boulders and the cuttlefish in its caves to the mermaids that haunt its waters, who imprison the Little Wo in their submarine palace. The Coastguard – another key character in the book – reinforces our sense of the dangers that plague the coast, since his job is to protect his fellow humans against them. The Coastguard’s world collides with the young pilot’s when the first Butterfly crashes near the Coastguard’s cottage, and the incident reinforces the point that both key human characters earn their living by courting danger, perched on the borderline between life and death along with their families. The Coastguard’s cottage (with his wife and children in it) stands close to the rocks on which boats and planes come to grief, while the pilot’s mother is keenly conscious of the deadliness of her son’s trade as an airman. Their familiarity with peril marks them out as fully prepared for the global conflict whose approach everyone was predicting in 1939.

Animals too, on the coast, exist on a fulcrum between life and death. Puffin’s Egg may or may not be alive as he waits for it to hatch; many people, including the mermaids, assume that it’s ‘addled’. Small creatures like Puffin and the Little Wo live in constant danger from predators such as cuttlefish and peregrine falcons. The falcons live in danger from human nest robbers such as the young climber. A fox Puffin meets in a field when he journeys inland is in danger from the hounds that chase it. Inhabitants of the coast and its adjacent landscapes and seascapes – Puffin’s world, in other words – resemble tightrope walkers or mountaineers, teetering precariously between survival and destruction.

Frontispiece of first edition, by Mary Shillabeer, with cliffs in background.

Puffin’s particular stretch of coast is made up of granite cliffs, impregnable bastions like the White Cliffs of Dover but also vertiginous precipices marking the end of one element and the start of another. The writer-artist Mervyn Peake wrote of 1939 as a cliff over which the world hung poised to drop:

O heart-beats – you are rattling dice –
My rattling dice
Proclaim the edge of precipice
At whose hid boulders stands a soundless sea –
These dice
Endanger me,
And spice
My days with hazards of futurity.[6]

In fact, the period immediately before the Second World War is often described in prose and verse, both then and now, as a precipice or cliff, and Peake’s poem perfectly summarizes – mixed metaphors and all – the intense consciousness at the time that multiple threats were coming to a head, and that the momentum of the world was now too strong to prevent its losing its balance and taking the plunge onto the rocks below. Moray Williams would have been as conscious of this momentum as anyone in Britain. Her husband Peter volunteered as an ARP warden in 1938, and his work as well as her father’s was shaped by conflict, which brought the need for both Hawker Hurricane fighters and emergency accommodation for refugees. Making her protagonist a seabird, who lives his life on the deadly margin between land and sea, means that Moray Williams’s novel conveys almost as well as Peake’s poem the strange tensions that governed this particular moment in global history. And her protagonist shares with his world a set of internal tensions that make him the perfect embodiment of the time in which she was writing.

In personality, Puffin is poised between one set of traits and another, a quality that makes him one of Moray Williams’s most complex creations. He is plump, short and clownish to look at but also a daring bird of action, who can fly low enough to ‘buzz’ other birds (as a pilot might ‘buzz’ his friends on an airfield) or leap from a plane on a sudden impulse to follow and protect the parachuting Little Wo. He lives alone in his clifftop burrow, but also longs for a companion (‘either a kind and pretty little sweetheart puffin […] or a brave, sturdy brother puffin’, p. 10) and a child. He is ‘honest’ (p. 9), but he is also prepared to be mildly dishonest when it suits him; for instance, he hides away the abandoned egg he has found for several hours before putting up a sign advertising its whereabouts to anyone who might be looking for it (pp. 9-11). He cares passionately for the Egg but forgets to sit on it. He is quite often bad tempered (for instance, he pushes a young puffin off a ledge for cheeking him, pp. 15-16) but also kind-hearted (he takes the Little Wo to his burrow as soon as he finds him on the shore, and even transfers his attention from the Egg for a while as he tends to his visitor’s needs). He is a homebird, satisfied to stay behind and wait for the Egg to hatch while the other puffins fly off to sea, but also a courageous traveller, willing to accompany the Little Wo to the ends of the earth to help him track down his human family. He is sometimes self-deprecating but also takes pleasure in fame – at least for a while – when his signature song makes him a star in America. He has limited experience but also a great deal of ingenuity, finding ways to escape from the very different prisons of the mermaids’ palace and the Coastguard’s cottage, outwitting a pack of hounds, and mimicking the voice of a zookeeper to help his friend slip out of a cage in London Zoo. He gets frustrated at times by the Little Wo’s endless naivety, but loves him and misses him badly when he’s gone. At every stage of his adventures, it’s his best characteristics that direct his actions, so that he always teeters in the right direction, but he sometimes feels shame for having been tempted to do the opposite. Puffin comes across, in fact, as a thoroughly ordinary person, but one who is capable of doing extraordinary things, which makes him the perfect hero for a time when everyday life has somehow got tangled up with the frightening, the difficult and the strange.

Mermaids in pursuit of the escaping Little Wo. Illustration by Mary Shillabeer.

Puffin’s two-sidedness extends from his personality to his identity. Both he and the Little Wo continually fluctuate, so to speak, between one mode of being and another. Moray Williams represents Puffin both as a puffin and as a kind of miniature human, while the Little Wo – like the Little Wooden Horse – comes across as both a toy and a very small person. They can talk to human beings, like the animals in Kenneth Graham’s The Wind in the Willows, but are also bound like them to their nonhuman identities, in this case as a bird and a toy. Puffin has wings and can fly, while the Little Wo has cotton paws which can get worn out by excessive scrambling among the rocks; at the same time, the two friends are able to hold hands when running away from their many pursuers, and Puffin can row a boat when the need arises. Puffin sings his signature song in English, and the song becomes a hit, first among the passengers on the Queen Mary, then among the citizens of New York; but he can also be barred from an English hotel because (as the porter says) ‘This isn’t a Natural History Museum’ (p. 128) – in other words, because he’s an animal. He and the Little Wo can be admitted as guests to the hotel dining room, thanks to their friend the pilot, but can also slip away unnoticed by scuttling under the dining room tables like the bird and dog they resemble.

Their unsettled identities get them in trouble repeatedly during their travels. The Little Wo, for instance – who seeks to ingratiate himself with everyone and believes everything he’s told – thinks the mermaids, Puffin’s neighbours, are delightful, and allows them to replace his small darned tail with the tail of a merdog, which gives him a third identity, that of a mythological creature, to supplement the two he already has. This means (as Puffin is well aware) that the Little Wo will never again be able to leave the sea and find his family, which means in turn that Puffin must find a way to rescue him by offering the mermaids something better in exchange for the stolen tail. He finds this object of trade in his own brightly-coloured rainbow beak, the part of his body that gives him the nickname he most dislikes, ‘sea-parrot’ (a name that proves prophetic when he ‘parrots’ the voice of a zookeeper). As soon as he gives the mermaids his beak, they give back the Little Wo’s tail and take away the fishtail, but Puffin is left with a ‘funny little stump’ and the feeling that a crucial part of him is missing. Fortunately, a puffin’s beak grows back soon after it’s been shed [https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fee.2620]; this happens annually after the breeding season, as Moray Williams may have known, since this is exactly when it happens in the book. Puffins, in other words, have shapeshifting built into their bodies, which means that our hero’s repeated transitions in the first part of the book – between animal and person, between a rainbow-beaked sea-parrot and an anonymous black-and-white bird with a stump on its face – do him no real damage.

Puffin caged by the Coastguard. Illustration by Mary Shillabeer.

But his dual nature becomes problematic when he first meets human people. On being taken back to the Coastguard’s cottage by his cliff-climbing son, both Puffin and the Little Wo are treated from the first as nonhuman entities: Puffin is put in a parrot’s cage and the Little Wo is tied by a thread, like a rattle, to the baby’s wrist. This treatment becomes disturbing when we realise that the Coastguard and his family can talk to both creatures as if they were fellow human beings, learning their back stories and enjoying Puffin’s rendition of the song that later makes him famous. In other words, they make a conscious choice to treat the pair as inferiors rather than equals, selecting from among their characteristics the ones that identify them as lower than themselves in that man-made hierarchy of species, the Great Chain of Being. Puffin’s response to the Little Wo, by contrast, was wholly generous, welcoming him into his burrow like a long-lost son or brother. The Coastguard and his family, on the other hand, never rise above their perception of their small captives as possessions to be disposed of as they wish, despite their articulacy and obvious intelligence. The Little Wo is eventually freed from the thread that ties him to the baby, because he can climb back into the cradle by himself and always does; but Puffin is never permitted to fly free, and there is never any question of the Little Wo being allowed to continue his quest for the child who lost him.

This becomes clear when the Coastguard’s son and the Little Wo become unexpected celebrities. Word soon gets round that a toy has been found by the son in a falcon’s nest, and a letter arrives from London inviting the boy and the famous toy to come and be interviewed by the papers. The Little Wo is delighted, because London is close to his old home, but Puffin overhears the Coastguard telling his wife that the toy will never be restored to its owner; he is wanted by a Museum, perhaps a Museum of Natural History, and ‘will be [kept] there for ever and ever’ to be gawped at by strangers (p. 92). The toy’s urgent search for Himself will come to an end, and he will be condemned to total stasis, frozen in time – or out of time – in perpetuity. The former migrant will no longer be a person in transit, with a rich identity and a variegated history, but stuck in a glass case in a fixed position, his life artificially reduced to a single moment that defines him for the rest of his existence. The parallel with refugees is painfully obvious: a group of people whose lives are all too often reduced to a single word (‘refugee’ or ‘migrant’), which is used to define them, the rest of their histories forgotten or ignored in the hostility and even fear that word can provoke.

The Coronation Scot. Illustration by Mary Shillabeer.

As it happens, Puffin could be said to have a personal reason to resist the objectification of living creatures, whether birds or playthings or human migrants. Moray Williams drew inspiration for her hero from an old glass case full of stuffed seabirds in her childhood home, North Stoneham, a crumbling Palladian mansion not far from Southampton. She saw the case again on returning to the house in November 1938, not long before it was due to be demolished. Prominent among the seabirds was a puffin, its colourful beak standing out from among the dusty blacks and whites of the gulls, murres, razorbills and gannets. Improbably, Puffin seems to share Ursula’s knowledge of glass display cases, taxidermy, and the museums that encourage both:

A museum! He had heard puffins speak of them before. Museums were full of glass cases, sealed, and filled with stuffed puffins, who were there for ever and ever. They would never fish nor fly again. It was worse, far worse, than being in a parrot’s cage in a pleasant kitchen with the waves breaking on the rocks outside. When he thought of the Little Wo shut in one of these ca[s]es for ever, in the artificial nest of a stuffed peregrine, with two stuffed peregrine children, and behind him a painted sky and a pastel sea, with school-children and other interested people staring at him all day long, Puffin closed his eyes. He simply could not bear it. (p. 92)

The perils that have faced the pair so far in their adventures shrink to insignificance beside this fate of being fixed for all time in rigid stillness, part of a simulated ‘natural’ environment crudely reproduced, for the benefit of city-dwellers, by means of a wholly unnatural process. That the toy might be reduced to this condition after being betrayed by a couple who claim to love him – the Coastguard and his wife – speaks to the problems that arise from lack of empathy. As Puffin points out to the Little Wo, an absence of fellow-feeling is not so much a matter of cruelty as of thoughtlessness: ‘They are ignorant, that’s all. And they don’t understand us; it isn’t their fault. If they had understood us they would have set us free long ago, and who knows if you wouldn’t have been at home by now and I back in my shabby little burrow’ (p. 93).

Puffin’s own sense of empathy is best displayed, of course, in his response to the Little Wo, who is stuffed by his very nature, just like an animal in a museum display case, but is treated by Puffin as if he were capable of every kind of feeling. On first meeting him, Puffin examines his ‘little cotton body, stuffed, and limp where the stuffing was soaked and lumpy from the sea’ (p. 25), but instead of dismissing him as an inanimate, cast-off object seeks instead to understand his history: ‘he gently asked the Little Wo where he came from, and what he was doing in the sea all alone at that time of day’ (p. 24). He ignores the toy’s disparaging remarks about Puffin’s beloved coast (for the Little Wo it’s a ‘dreadful barren shore’, p. 25), and recognises instead that his new friend has been ‘greatly loved’, that he is small and helpless, and that he can be readily accommodated in his burrow. And he goes on to adapt his own story and circumstances to the migrant’s needs: ‘With a little arrangement, they slept very comfortably with the Egg between them, and for the first time since he found it Puffin forgot to wonder whether by the morning it would be hatched’ (p. 26). Puffin’s sense of time has begun to synch with that of his visitor, rather than the Egg, and not long afterwards the seabird becomes a migrant himself, voluntarily taking to sea in a home-made boat in a bid to give the toy’s story a happy ending.

Puffin and the Little Wo fleeing through London Zoo. Illustration by Mary Shillabeer.

Puffin’s narrative involves several moments when people without empathy or ‘understanding’ manage to acquire it. Puffin himself gets more empathetic. In building his boat, for instance, he begins by rejecting the help offered by various animals in his neighbourhood, then quickly realises he cannot manage on his own and finds ways to cajole them into forgiving him for his initial rudeness. The porter who at first bars Puffin and the Little Wo from the grand hotel later becomes decidedly helpful to them. The Coastguard and his family are reunited with Puffin and the Little Wo when the two small heroes ask them for help in rescuing the airman after his crash, and at this point the humans beg forgiveness for their earlier betrayal of their nonhuman visitors. But there are also two more incidents when human lack of empathy nearly ruins the adventurers. At London Zoo Puffin is again identified as an animal rather than a person when a little boy grabs him by the neck, thinking he has escaped from his enclosure, after which he is chased through the zoo by a swarm of keepers, and only escapes by confirming once and for all his human credentials (as I mentioned, he mimics a keeper’s voice with perfect accuracy). The most disturbing instance of lack of empathy, though, happens in America, where Puffin is almost trapped in time by the operations of capitalism. Having made his name by singing his song about puffins, whose most memorable line perfectly captures the American Dream (‘there’s nuffin’ that a puffin cannot do!’), Puffin is persuaded to sign a ‘paper’ which he cannot read; only later does he find he has signed a legal contract with a music-hall owner, ‘which bound [him] to stay with the show till it came to an end, and it might go on for years and years’ (p. 147). Capitalism, it would seem, has the disruption and control of time built into its mechanisms, surreptitiously passing ownership of a person’s daily labour from themselves to someone else without their consent, and thereafter imposing the new owner’s timetable on the labourer for as long as the contract remains in effect. In Adventures of Puffin, as in The Little Wooden Horse, showmanship is the trade in which this clandestine transference of ownership manifests itself most visibly. The Little Wooden Horse breaks himself to bits performing for gold in a travelling circus, while Puffin and the Little Wo find themselves trapped within the narrow confines of the music hall, having been ‘brought up’ (in Puffin’s case) ‘to the beauty and freedom of the sea’ (p. 147). Capitalism makes objects of living creatures, placing them in metaphorical glass cases to be gawped at by anyone willing and able to pay money for the privilege and keeping them there without hope of release. Luckily Puffin and the Little Wo find a way to break the contract: their friend the English pilot comes to watch the show, and on seeing him they promptly jump into his pockets, where with his help they evade the scrutiny of the journalists and showbiz personnel who come looking for them. The pilot is not concerned with distinctions between species or with other kinds of boundaries and borders; he walks the two friends through the door of the music hall, just as he had earlier walked them through the door of the swanky hotel in an English seaside town, in defiance of social rules and contracts. Later he invites them to fly home with him to England on his plane, broaching the vaster threshold or border of the Atlantic Ocean. In the process he renders the money they earned at the music hall immaterial, since they no longer need to pay for their passage – this being the major motivation for their having agreed to become performers in the first place. Empathy frees the two small heroes from the grip of capitalism, just as empathy saves the pilot’s life, when Puffin fetches the Coastguard to rescue the young man after his plane has crashed. For Moray Williams, understanding or fellow feeling offers a modest but essential counter-narrative to the various forms of hostility, indifference and oppression that have brought the world to the brink of war.

The pilot’s conduct in the music hall confirms his status as a human double for his two small friends. When Puffin and the Little Wo dive into his pockets he distracts reporters’ attention by repeating Puffin’s words from an incident earlier in the story. At one point in their adventures the modest heroes meet a fox and get caught up in the hunt that is chasing him (it’s worth mentioning here that foxhunts take place in winter, between November and March or April, so this is another temporal marker in the text; if the friends had met the fox a few weeks earlier they would never have encountered the hunt). The Little Wo finds himself substituted for the fox as quarry for the ravening hounds, and Puffin saves the toy by telling him to dive into a rabbit’s burrow (much as he later dives into the pilot’s pocket) while he sits at the entrance and distracts the dogs with breezy conversation. As the hounds come up to ask if he has seen the little fugitive, Puffin refuses to inform them of his whereabouts, but also refuses to lie to them about it: ‘I can’t say, I’m sure,’ he says vaguely in response to their questions; ‘I really couldn’t tell you’; ‘I wouldn’t like to say, I’m sure’ (p. 114). The pilot repeats these words verbatim to the crowd of reporters looking for his friends at the music hall: ‘I can’t say, I’m sure’; ‘I really couldn’t tell you’; ‘I wouldn’t like to say, I’m sure’ (p. 150). The echo places him firmly in his friends’ camp, as a person who refuses to countenance hunting of any kind (in this case the intrusive tracking down of individuals by the paparazzi), but who also refuses to tell lies if he can avoid it. As with Puffin, his convictions are clear, his loyalties unwavering, and he maintains both in the face of a world that too readily readjusts its position in pursuit of profit, or in conformity with the dictates of a repressive ideology.

Puffin and the Little Wo at the music hall. Illustration by Mary Shillabeer.

The innate similarity between the pilot and his two small friends reinforces another key theme of the book: bonds forged in defiance of difference. The most important of such bonds is the family bond, whereby people of different generations (and hence of different backgrounds and even cultures, each generation shaped by the different circumstances under which it grew up) support each other in an unbreakable unit held together by unwavering affection. As we’ve seen, Puffin treats the Little Wo as a family member – a child or a somewhat wayward younger brother – and he reaffirms the bond between them at the moment of parting, looking back at the toy as it waves from the nursery window and thinking to himself, as often before, ‘Funny, faithful, happy Little Wo’ (p. 191). The phrase implies that the toy has found his happy ending against all odds; and when Puffin’s own happy ending follows, it is equally the outcome of unwavering faithfulness to the idea of a happy home and a loving family.

In both Puffin’s and the Little Wo’s case, the family and the home are non-traditional ones – the traditional nuclear family having been placed under intolerable strain in 1939 by the conditions of war and worldwide migration. The Little Wo has forged his strongest bond with a creature who is not even of the same species – Himself – which may explain why he finds it so easy to bond with Puffin, as well as with the many other beings he meets on his adventures. Puffin, by contrast, forges his deepest bond with his own species in the form of the Egg, and afterwards with the Little Wo, who can almost (but not quite) be equated with the puffin chick into which he hoped the Egg would hatch, or with the puffin companion he longed for. In the end, however, he gains an actual puffin companion. Having been out of temporal step with the rest of his community since the beginning of the book, it seems inevitable that he should remain out of step in the final chapter; and sure enough, when he gets home to his humble burrow he finds that his fellow puffins have left their breeding grounds for a second time, and that the season is over. On this occasion, however, someone is waiting for him: a flightless puffling who has hatched after all the rest and been left behind when the others flew off to sea. Washed up on Puffin’s clifftop by the sea of circumstance – like a second Egg or another Little Wo – the puffling is adopted by the friendly seabird, as promptly and completely as he adopted the toy. But for this new castaway no other home calls to him; no shadow of another parting stands between them, as Dickens might have put it.[7]

Puffin tells the puffling his story. Illustration by Mary Shillabeer.

The puffling is no more the seabird’s son, of course, than the Little Wo was, but fits more neatly into Puffin’s narrative. That it is a narrative, carefully constructed by Puffin to suit his needs, is confirmed by another detail about this ending, which is that Puffin manages to persuade himself that the chick has emerged from his beloved Egg, bringing his story to the neatest of conclusions. The Egg came into Puffin’s life as a creature out of time, like the Little Wo and Puffin himself, and Puffin has remained convinced from first to last that being out of time can have a positive outcome. An Egg might hatch, Puffin believes, long after it should have started to rot. A toy might find a faithful friend long after he has been seemingly lost for ever. A puffling might find an adoptive parent long after it has been left to starve by its biological parents. Understanding arises from a willingness to embrace the unfortunate, the abandoned and the unconventional, and Puffin has both these qualities in spades: that is, understanding or empathy, and a willingness to take unfortunate strangers to heart, however inconvenient this may prove to himself. Puffin, then, is a creature perfectly suited to a time out of joint, just as the principal humans in the story – the Coastguard and the pilot – are perfectly suited to the defence of the realm that will soon be necessary.

One peculiarity of Puffin’s series of unconventional families is that they contain no mothers – this despite the fact that Moray Williams was a mother when she wrote it. Nuclear families like the Coastguard’s, the pilot’s and Moray Williams’s have a mother at the centre of them, but the Egg has no visible mother and neither does the Little Wo when Puffin finds him or the puffling he adopts in the final chapter. When he realises that the Egg is motherless, the seabird does all he can to fill the role himself:

For the rest of the day he sat on the Egg, as he had seen the mother puffins do, but he was awkward at it. He rolled from one side to the other; he fell into a doze and fell off it. he found it most uncomfortable, and in some strange way he felt that the Egg was uncomfortable too. It did not like to be sat on, at any rate by Puffin. (p. 18)

So he seeks out a better mother for the Egg, first approaching the mermaids, who assure him of their maternal credentials in such glowing terms that the seabird becomes unsettled – after all, ‘Every puffin knows that a mermaid’s promises are not to be trusted, and the more solemnly they promise the more treacherous are their hearts’ (p. 20) – and backs off, earning himself their everlasting enmity. Later the Little Wo takes on the task of finding a mother for the Egg, and his choice of candidates for the position includes a cow, several rabbits, foxes, voles, and a kindly seal. When the seal gets stuck in Puffin’s burrow and has to be rescued before returning to her own family, the two friends give up the chase, and from this point onwards the need for a mother is never mentioned again. Puffin pronounces the Egg unviable and commits himself wholly to the Little Wo; and when in the end he decides that the Egg has indeed hatched and produced the puffling, a whole year after he left it to fend for itself, the little bird’s lack of a mother is never brought up. In times of need the only requisite for a family is whether or not it can provide a safe, loving and supportive environment for its members; the Little Wo knows this when he seeks a mother figure among all the many species that frequent the coast, refusing to confine himself to puffins or even birds. Puffin provides this environment for each of his chosen small companions, just as they provide much-needed companionship for Puffin.

The seabird’s easy adoption of a traditionally female role (though he doesn’t fulfil all of its functions with equal success) stands at the heart of what I take to be the novel’s key achievement. In it, Moray Williams succeeds in providing her young readers with an alternative model of masculinity: one which is nurturing, consistently and practically focused on the needs of others, empathetic, and unconditionally loving of its smaller, weaker companions. Even the Little Wo’s brief transformation into a kind of soldier as he marches in triumph towards his long-lost owner’s home has as its object not the conquest of a neighbouring nation but the peaceful reclamation of his own. At a time when a mood of violent militancy gripped the world, Moray Williams’s alternative vision of men, presented to a new generation of men (her own children were boys), offered up the possibility of a very different future. That this is the function of her narrative seems to be confirmed by the final paragraph of the last chapter, in which Puffin sits down with the puffling on the edge of the cliff, looking out across the ocean, and tells him the story of his adventures. Having finished his story, the seabird goes on to tell a further story of renewed community and the complete realignment of disjointed timelines:

And when, his adventures told, they sat quietly in the moonlight, he began the tale of all the wonderful things they were going to do together in the days ahead, when nobody would be lonely any longer and the Puffins came back to the Puffinry. (p. 198)

Moray Williams does not show us the Puffins’ return; we are asked only to imagine it, just as we were earlier asked to imagine the Little Wo’s reunion with Himself. She leaves her child readers, in other words, looking to the ‘days ahead’, but substitutes for the fearful prognosis of war a visionary glimpse of a time when loneliness will be banished, both for those like Puffin who have wandered far away from their homes and for those like the puffling who have been cast out and left behind. Immediately before this final sentence, she describes the ‘rainbow colours’ fading out of the granite cliffs; the rainbow being a symbol of hope in Genesis, as well as an echo of Puffin’s own rainbow beak, which he gave away to the mermaids but grew back while he was living with the Coastguard’s family. The rainbow colours may go dark, but they will return, Moray Williams assures us, with all they represented in her lifetime, and all they have represented since. It’s an ending that speaks to our own time as powerfully, I think, as it spoke to hers.

The Little Wo begs a mother seal to adopt the Egg. Illustration by Mary Shillabeer.

NOTES

[1] Lundy Island seems the most likely location for Puffin’s puffinry, because it is made of granite, unlike (for instance) the limestone cliffs at Purbeck. Moray Williams identifies Puffin’s cliffs as in the ‘West Country’ and of ‘granite’: Adventures of Puffin (London: Harrap, 1939), p. 194. All quotations are from this edition.

[2] Not that it didn’t do well. Colin Davison tells us that ‘By Christmas 1939 Adventures of Puffin had sold almost 2000 copies in less than two months, almost matching the early success of Adventures of the Little Wooden Horse’: Davison, Through the Magic Door: Ursula Moray Williams, Gobbolino and the Little Wooden Horse (Newcastle: Northumbria Press, 2011), p. 72. It never made it into paperback, however, which meant that it remains forever a product of its time.

[3] For the success of Adventures of the Little Wooden Horse see Davison, Through the Magic Door, pp. 60-62.

[4] See Davison, Through the Magic Door, p. 54.

[5] The picture of the plane provided by the book’s illustrator, Mary Shillabeer, looks less like a record-breaking single-pilot plane than a transport plane, the de Havilland Albatross, which was built between 1938 and 1939. Interestingly, a well-known photo of the Coronation Scot, taken in January 1939, shows it with an Albatross flying overhead. Could Shillabeer have based her plane on this one?

[6] ‘O Heart-Beats’, Mervyn Peake, Collected Poems, ed. R. W. Maslen, Fyfield Books (Manchester: Carcanet, 2008), p. 52.

[7] That’s a reference to the final sentence of Great Expectations (1860-1861), in the revised version of 1868: ‘I took her hand in mine, and we went out of the ruined place; and, as the morning mists had risen long ago when I first left the forge, so, the evening mists were rising now, and in all the broad expanse of the tranquil light they showed to me, I saw no shadow of another parting from her.’

Mervyn Peake, Letters from a Lost Uncle (from Polar Regions) (1948)

Mervyn and Maeve in 1939

The art of Maeve Gilmore and Mervyn Peake, married writer-artists who moved from house to house many times in the course of their lives together, had a tendency to burst out of formal spaces (studio, gallery, the narrow confines of the sketchbook or the written page) and swarm over the domestic spaces they shared. Both revelled in painting the walls of their homes, Mervyn transforming damp patches in his warehouse apartment in Battersea into ‘faces and landscapes […] so that what should have been detrimental [became] a world of angels and monsters’,[1] then decorating the doors of their flat in Maida Vale with ‘vines, flowers and birds’,[2] while Maeve painted dynamic murals all over their Chelsea house from attic to basement. Real-life spaces, too, invaded their art. The island where they lived for four happy years – Sark in the Channel Islands – peeps out through the prose in Mervyn’s second novel Gormenghast (1950), whose titular castle shares with it the names of certain topographical features. Maeve’s novel Titus Awakes (2011) ends with the fictional protagonist making a home on Sark with the real-life Peakes. Maeve’s murals come to life in her illustrated children’s book, Captain Eustace and the Magic Room (1981), which combines knitted dolls, rhymes, and photographs of her wall paintings to create a narrative that bridges the gap between an ordinary house and the wilderness of dreams. Maeve herself became the subject of Mervyn’s poems, drawings and paintings, while Mervyn became the subject of Maeve’s celebrated memoir, A World Away (1970), as well as of her novel and many of her pictures. Their imaginative world could not be segregated from the material world through which they moved, whose details they took in with all their senses, transmuted in their minds, and revitalised in strange new colours, shapes and sounds.

Nowhere in Mervyn’s work is the intimate link between his imaginative world and the material realities mediated by his senses more vividly realised than in his picture book Letters from a Lost Uncle (from Polar Regions) (1948). The book tells the story of a robust old man who wanders the wild regions of the world, far from human habitation, in quest of a mysterious White Lion known only as the ‘Emperor of the Snows’.[3] He carries with him a typewriter (which he uses to type his letters), a ‘good fat book’ full of blank paper for typing, pencils (with which he draws the creatures and adventures he encounters) and a camera (with which he hopes to photograph the Lion when he finds it). He is accompanied only by his ‘retainer’ (p. [8]), a ‘turtle dog’ called Jackson, who often annoys him. It’s a simple premise, and some have found it over-simple. The Peake scholar Peter Winnington, for instance, suggests that ‘the storyline is weak and fizzles out when the uncle encounters the White Lion, although the final picture, with its mandala in the sky, suggests a sense of wholeness that the text belies’.[4] But for me, the book represents the ultimate fusion of word and image in Mervyn’s oeuvre, whose power is largely derived from its unusual form. The crudely typed pages peppered with mistakes; the energetic and prolific pencil sketches; the smudges and smears on the surface of the paper where Jackson has trodden on it, or spilled gravy on it, or the Uncle has bled on it after cutting his finger; all these details generate the sense of ghostly presences at the edges of the reader’s perception, beings alive and commanding our attention despite the distances of space and time that separate us. The effect is, I imagine, a little like spending time in one of Maeve and Mervyn’s flats or houses, where the murals on the walls invoked a wild world beyond their confines whose shapes were always intruding on the house’s occupants at the edge of vision, ghostly manifestations of an imaginative life as vivid as the papers, pencils, tables, brushes, found objects and books that littered their rooms.

Dustjacket of first edition, front

The most striking aspect of the book’s form is its physical presentation as a collection of letters. Each letter is inexpertly typed with occasional corrections or interjections by hand, illustrated with pencil sketches, and slightly damaged in various ways by the two central characters – the Uncle and Jackson – who share their cramped quarters together, with all the potential for accidents this entails. The dustcover of the first edition takes the form of a hefty envelope with a red wax seal sticking down the flap at the back and a stamp showing the Lion affixed to the front; the stamp itself has been stamped with two postmarks shaped like snowshoes. The letters inside amount to a single continuous letter, with each new section labelled ‘2nd Letter’, ‘THIRD LETTER’, ‘4TH LETTER’ and so on, and distinguished from one another, often in parentheses, by allusions to the passage of time: ‘(Continued next day)’, ‘(weeks later’), ‘six days later’ etc. The effect of this form is to encourage the reader to relive the Uncle’s adventures as they are supposed to have happened, and to reinforce the sense of unplanned or semi-planned spontaneity which is implicit in the terms ‘adventure’, ‘discover’ and ‘explore’. The form is further rendered integral to the narrative by the fact that the stamp on the dustcover represents the object of the Uncle’s travels, the great White Lion; in the first edition the reader was thereby encouraged to turn back to the dustcover for reference whenever the stamp was mentioned in the text. Holding the first edition, then, must have felt like holding the Uncle’s collection of letters itself, as against a printed version of them. The book would have had an aura to it, as if you could detect the fingers of the Uncle laboriously marking the very same pages you were turning over as you read. The book is a missive from outside the familiar universe, but it is also a piece of documentary evidence, like the travelworn diary of Captain Scott recovered from his tent. Polar winds seem to blow from its pages, which serve as an opening onto the beyond. You might be reminded of Mervyn’s preface to the book of his drawings published by Grey Walls Press the following year, which describes the drawing process as a daring expedition into uncharted territory:

The voice of a pencil. […] The voice of ink, of chalk, of pigment or stone. What are they, these varying voices that, soundless, can be like tumult or as faint as a whisper in the next room?

From the brain in the eye and the eye in the brain they make their way, these accents, through the arm and fingers to a canvas like a field of untrodden snow, to a cold chaos of stone, to the square yawn of a paper page as empty of life as the manless moon. These, the imponderable platforms: the breathless theatres.[5]

The form of Letters from a Lost Uncle makes of it a breathless theatre, a ‘paper stage’ as he calls it a few lines later in the same preface. It performs its narrative on the manless moon of the empty page, which is invoked by the vast fields of untrodden snow through which the Uncle tramps. From it, the voice of the pencil – and of the typewriter, the ‘tap-tap-tapping [of] a little black machine’ which generates the Uncle’s words as the pencil generates his pictures (p. [3]) – issues like a call to action or a summons to the strange denizens of your seeing brain.

Dustjacket of first edition, rear

Uncharted territory is where Maeve and Mervyn lived and worked. They inhabited a world that was self-evidently falling apart like a melting ice field, opening up a new range of uncertainties and possibilities unsuspected by previous generations. The British Empire into which they were born – Mervyn in China, Maeve in London – had begun to dissolve, with Ireland the first of its colonies to shake off the cold colonial bonds (Maeve’s father was Irish), closely followed by a succession of independence movements (Burma, Egypt, India) which sometimes took the Irish struggle for liberation as inspiration.[6] The Second World War brought bombs to the streets of London and other British cities, altering them beyond recognition, as Mervyn’s ballad The Rhyme of the Flying Bomb (c. 1947) acknowledged and perversely celebrated. The waves of migration unleashed by war and new national boundaries transformed the world’s populations. Troops who served overseas returned with a new consciousness of alternative ways of living, while continued rationing and the reorganization of British society through unprecedented initiatives like the National Health Service seemed to signal a radical break with the imperial past. Between them, the Great War and World War Two bracketed a rupture from the familiar narrative of British history, a rent that almost severed it in two, before and after, ancient and modern. This giant rupture found a parallel in the many small ruptures experienced by Maeve and Mervyn as they moved from house to house, driven by economic necessity, conscription, Mervyn’s mental illness of 1942, and the endless quest for an artistic space in which to hone their craft.

This last, most quixotic of quests is what took them to Sark in 1946. It was a move that cut them off from Britain in a final, heroic gesture at self-determination, a gesture that came to an end when economic necessity took them back to London again at the end of the decade. Their period on Sark proved to be perhaps the most creative of their lives; at least, it was intensely creative for Mervyn, while Maeve completed some of her finest paintings there, and the island continued to haunt her work for the rest of her life. Marooning themselves from the crumbling world of the 1940s perfectly suited a couple who spent so much of their imaginative time practising an art focused on the domestic: from the titanic castle where Mervyn’s most famous alter ego grows up – Titus Groan, protagonist of the Gormenghast books – to the open windows and almost empty rooms that feature in Maeve’s paintings of the period, exposed to the winds of an island surrounded by dizzying cliffs. Adrift in the ocean between England and France they could concentrate on the haunted inner spaces and strange bodily and architectural surfaces that obsessed them, exploring their imaginative relationships with each other, their children, and the diverse coterie of friends and fascinating strangers – real and imagined – they had gathered outside the family circle.

Maeve Gilmore, Sark Interior

The Lost Uncle is an explorer, a word that conjures up the epic travels of the adventurers who helped to forge the image of the British Empire: men like James Cook, David Livingston, Burton and Speke, Burke and Wills or Captain Scott, whose stories featured in the boy’s magazines read by Mervyn in his childhood. Many of these explorers ended their lives lost and wandering in an alien landscape, their links to the Empire severed by distance, their isolation sometimes intensified by their refusal to learn from indigenous populations. After their deaths they were hailed as heroes, their tragic ends held up as models for active young men being trained in the service of imperialism. Mervyn’s Lost Uncle shares their isolation and their sometimes gimcrack heroism – he is always improvising hairs’-breadth escapes from unforeseen dangers – but the Empire from which he has severed himself seems to have splintered into fragments, like the ice floe ‘the size of Kent’ on which he finds himself stranded at the start of the narrative [p. [7]), a symbolic representation of the slow disintegration of the island of Great Britain along with its colonial acquisitions. He hopes his account of his travels will find its way to the Natural History Museum in Kensington, but has no idea if the building still exists. The ship on which he sails at one point is called the S S Em, which he thinks may be short for Empire or maybe Emu (p. [31]), the syllable ‘Em’ invoking both a lost imperial power and a funny-looking bird from one of its colonies, as if the former may have mutated into the latter. The stamp he uses to send his letters displays not the head of the British Emperor at the time of writing, George VI, but the leonine ‘Emperor of the Snows’, the stamp itself having been manufactured by ‘Esquimaux’ rather than the Royal Mail (p. [22]).[7] The rapidly-drifting ice floe, and the general absence of placenames in the Uncle’s narrative (apart from the section set in London), suggest that the map of the world is in constant flux, no longer fixed to the walls of schoolrooms with the British territories clearly marked in red, but instead sketched hastily in erasable pencil on fragile paper as places and beasts appear and vanish before the sketcher’s eyes.

Even climatic zones have become confused in the Uncle’s world. In the Polar Regions of the title, polar vultures, polar snakes and polar beetles cohabit with polar bears, narwhals and ‘sea elephants’ (i.e. elephant seals), so that the jungles he explored in his early years somehow overlap with the icy lands to which he has dedicated himself in his maturity. The icy waste where he finally finds the great White Lion has both northern polar bears and southern penguins in it, as well as antelopes and ‘snow serpents’. If the Uncle’s pages are a mess, with their errata, smudges and spillages, the world he inhabits shares in this messiness, no longer organised around national borders, trade routes and zoological categories, but spontaneously reshaping itself from moment to moment, at the whim of the words and pencils with which it is described.

The Uncle’s adriftness extends to his home life as well as his severance from nations and empires. The ‘4th Letter’ tells his back story, describing how he found himself alienated from his relatives pretty much from birth. He ran away from home as a week-old baby (just like Peter Pan),[8] and was afterwards forcibly ‘strapped […] down in a cradle’ until ‘I was old enough to go to school’ (p. [25]); this is the closest he comes in his narrative to mentioning his parents, who feature only as an implicit part of the collective ‘they’ who seek to coerce him into compliance from an early age. The rest of his youth is spent in an equally traumatic state of forced detention. On his first day at boarding school he drinks so much ink that he is confined to bed once more until he is old enough to leave, and on returning home he runs away for a second time, comes home again because he is hungry, eats his way through the larder, and promptly falls ill ‘until I was twenty-two, when I married’ (p. [26]) (we never learn how he managed to meet his wife while bedbound). Later he runs away again, this time from his marriage, infuriating his wife and her many siblings. Even his relationship with the nephew to whom he writes his letters begins on a shaky footing: ‘I didn’t like you much at first,’ he explains in the 4th Letter (p. [38]), despite never having met him. The 4th Letter, in fact, represents the Uncle as a lifelong Robinson Crusoe, marooned in his youth among the teeming masses of London, just as he is later self-marooned among the waves of an endless ocean, or the equatorial jungles, or the featureless polar snows.

Perhaps this is because his home life and his native city share in the topographical confusion of the world beyond, so that the Uncle considers himself an explorer in the wilderness of his own back yard. He transforms his London house into an urban jungle by bringing home a range of live specimens (‘different kinds of insects, mushrooms and rats’, p. [28]) and storing them in the lounge. He carves the leg of his wife’s favourite armchair into a pipe, which he then takes with him on his travels. As his wife grows increasingly hostile to him – quite reasonably so in view of his habits – he takes to living on the streets, sleeping on a bench in Cannon Street Station and passing his days in the Natural History Museum (with its eccentric collection of stuffed creatures from all regions and all periods), or sketching the statues of lions in Trafalgar Square. In doing so, he underlines his conviction that central London is a jungle, a belief he shares with his creator Mervyn, who went ‘headhunting’ – sketching the heads of random strangers – on the London Tube and in its streets and squares throughout his life. Even when the Uncle decides to abandon the S S Em and sets out on his travels by himself, he constructs an improvised raft made of an upturned table with a wooden chair strapped to it, wrapping himself for warmth in a homely eiderdown which he later stuffs with orchid stalks to use as tobacco. By building his table raft he signals the continuity between domestic space and the nonhuman wild spaces from which it springs and on which it ultimately depends. The raft also affirms Mervyn’s instinctive belief that in the context of post-war Britain, a house where such a table, chair and eiderdown might be found could be readily thought of as unmoored, engaged in a state of constant motion through strange waters.

Despite his tendency to run away from institutions of Empire – nurseries, schools, cities, museums, houses, marriage – the Lost Uncle takes with him on his travels many elements of colonialist masculinity. His unflattering drawings and descriptions of his pointedly nameless wife (e.g. ‘the end of her nose grew as cold as ice, and her ears burned like beetroots’, p. [29]) imply a misogyny that would have been very familiar to the imperialist boy heroes of the nineteenth century. His bowler hat, which he never takes off, aligns him with the bourgeois denizens of the City of London, the bankers and brokers who are compared to ‘Vampires’ in a poem Mervyn wrote around the same time as Lost Uncle.[9] As if to underscore his continued commitment to his imperialist roots, the Uncle blithely ignores the presence of indigenous people in the lands he explores. The ‘esquimaux’ of the Arctic are only hinted at by the existence of their stamp, while he only ever encounters one inhabitant of the equatorial jungles, a ‘pigmy’ who is chased up a tree by a crocodile (p. [60]), and who is of interest to him solely because he lets fall, as he climbs, a letter with the lion stamp fixed to the envelope. Local people in other places get subsumed into the landscape, becoming a peripheral presence in what he calls the ‘coloured ports’ and ‘black harbours’ (p. [32]). At the same time, the Uncle repeatedly appropriates the tools of indigenous people, from kayaks, igloos and harpoons to birchbark canoes, dugouts, coracles and wigwams or tepees. The same colonial attitude that designed and filled the great museums of London – the Victoria and Albert, the Science Museum, the Natural History Museum, and the nearby British Museum – manifests itself both in the Uncle’s appearance and in his methods of exploration.

Chief among these methods, of course, is his exploitation of the turtle dog, Jackson. Jackson is the Jim to the Lost Uncle’s superannuated Huckleberry Finn, an embodiment of the unease experienced by many white writers in representing people of colour at a time when British and other colonialisms were being dismantled all over the world. The Uncle describes his first meeting with Jackson soon after he has written about the only Black character in the book, the ‘negro’ with whom he shares his cabin on the S S Em (p. [29]). This man never gets named, and we only ever encounter him in his sleep, when the Uncle decides not to wake him and tell him of his plan to leave the ship on a raft. The Uncle therefore sets out on his raft alone, unlike Huck Finn, and is at first supremely happy in his solitude. But as a son of Empire, however keen to disengage himself from the Empire’s conventional citizens as embodied in his wife and family, the Uncle cannot finally imagine embarking on a voyage of discovery without a convenient indigenous servant by his side. He finds one on a beach of red sand ‘littered’ with what he calls turtle dogs, a term that combines the traits of a faithful animal companion – a dog, which has so often been recruited to pull explorers’ sledges – and a water-dwelling reptile, whose shell suggests both the ability to take your home with you wherever you go and the impenetrable obduracy of its wearer. When he first sees Jackson, the Uncle at once decides he will ‘be useful […] as a beast of burden – and possibly as a friend’ (p. [36]), identifying him as both human and nonhuman in a manner that has proved convenient for enslavers and exploitative employers since the beginning of time. The enslaver analogy is reinforced by the Uncle’s claim that Jackson was lazy when he first met him (‘as you can see [from the picture] there was not much life in J’) and that he had to be coerced into servitude (he ‘didn’t want to come with me at first’). Despite this, the Uncle claims elsewhere that Jackson is happy to be exploited: ‘he has always been quite willing to help,’ he tells his nephew, ‘although I have never seen him smile’ (p. [48]). ‘Also’, he adds, ‘he does not mind me hammering nails into his back to hang things on’; the use of ‘back’ here for ‘shell’ underscores the parallel with the abusive practices of slavers. So too does this sentence from the first letter: ‘I wouldn’t swap him for six tins of condensed milk or a jug of hot rum’ (p. [8]). At this stage, the Uncle talks about Jackson as a useful object, like the ‘things’ the turtle dog carries on his nail-studded shell – though the use of the pronoun ‘him’, and the statement that the Uncle wouldn’t swap him, reassert Jackson’s incipient humanity.

The Uncle’s ‘retainer’ starts out as a figure of fun, whose function is to act as a foil to the irascible Uncle. Jackson’s head is always wrapped in a tattered kerchief, as if he suffers from a permanent cold; this makes him look like a housewife from illustrations of the 1940s, who kept her hair wrapped in a headscarf to protect it from dust. He seems unable to comprehend the simplest instructions until they have been repeated multiple times. His clumsiness leaves traces all over the Uncle’s pages in the form of spillages and footprints, and he seems to be voiceless, like a silent movie comic; as the Uncle puts it, he ‘has no conversation’ (p. [8]), which suggests he could speak if he wished but chooses not to. He can be funny because he is an imaginary creature, a hybrid being located somewhere between a sea- or land-dwelling animal and a person; his kind does not exist, which makes his exploitation by the Uncle somehow bearable. He can be funny too, perhaps, because he never complains about his treatment, though Mervyn makes it perfectly clear how unpleasant this treatment is. Even when Jackson develops a ‘beastly cough’ the Uncle has no sympathy for him at all, commenting tersely ‘Am very irritated’ (p. [57]); the word ‘beastly’ suggests that at this point the Uncle thinks of him more as a ‘beast of burden’ than a ‘friend’, while at other times the ‘friend’ aspect comes to the fore, as when the Uncle names a waterfall after him (though afterwards, the Uncle writes, ‘I wished I hadn’t’, p. [43]). Located at an uncertain point on the spectrum between humanity and animalism, beaked and shelled but possessing human-like arms and legs, Jackson avoids being wholly aligned with the enslaved people, exploited workers or abused women which his treatment conjures up, but unsettlingly invokes all three.

There is, however, something mysterious about Jackson; a quality that links him to the many strange animals he and the Uncle encounter in their wanderings. The Uncle never tells us anything about the culture Jackson came from, as embodied in the beach of red sand ‘with turtle dogs littered all over it’ where he finds him (p. [36]); the term ‘litter’ here summarises the explorer’s attitude to that culture, if he thinks of it at all. Jackson drifts into the narrative, in fact, out of the same hidden world that spawns the other beasts in Mervyn’s book. We learn nothing about the White Lion on the stamp, for instance, apart from his title, the ‘Emperor of the Snows’. We learn nothing about the ‘swarms of fishes’ that lift their ‘moonlit heads’ from the sea when the Uncle sings to express his happiness as he sails away from the S S Em on his table raft (p. [35]) (what draws them to him? We never learn). Or the swarms of little wailing creatures that suddenly appear on a particularly desolate tract of snow, ‘pouring themselves over the hills and wringing their hands as they ran’ (p. [59]); they disappear as suddenly as they came, leaving the Uncle with only the sense that ‘they were fleeing from the scene of some Arctic tragedy’. The snow-serpent that attacks the Uncle, forcing him to use his ‘swordfish’ leg to defend himself; the Polar beetle; the flock of Arctic vultures that assail the Uncle and Jackson from the air, ‘huge birds with bodies as big as dogs’’ and beaks ‘like scissors’ (p. [65]); what version of the Arctic do these creatures inhabit? The Uncle can never have seen them in the Natural History Museum; no wonder he thinks it may have vanished. Jackson shares his nature with these beings, all the more so because he is voiceless and has no back story. He cannot be categorised or fitted into any of the neat Linnaean lists beloved of imperial scientists; he is at home in some of the regions where the Uncle is only an interloper. Every now and then, too, his behaviour hints at a secret agenda inaccessible to his master/companion. When the Uncle’s life is in danger he catches Jackson apparently ‘smiling behind his hand’ (p. [106]), but concludes that this is impossible because the turtle dog has ‘never used any expressions before’ – except once, again at a time when the Uncle’s life was in danger, ‘but that was his nervousness’, the Uncle thinks, ‘or else colic’. Jackson and the other beings of the wild occupy an unseen, unspoken space to which the Uncle only has limited access.

At the same time, the Uncle himself seems to be gradually mutating into one of these beings of the wild. He has a missing leg, which has been replaced with what he insists is the spike of a swordfish but is clearly a narwhal tusk, with its distinctive corkscrew spiral. This leg makes him literally part animal, and it’s the part of his body that proves most useful in protecting him against the dangers of the wilderness. In the course of the book we see it being used to skewer a hungry wolf, to pin a snow-serpent to a tree, to fend off vultures, to stop Jackson and the Uncle from sliding off an icy cliff by being employed as an impromptu ice axe, and to anchor them both to the ice when a tornado threatens to blow them away. The Uncle’s leg-spike, in other words, helps him adapt to the environments he moves through, serving as a twisted bridge between his humanity and the wilderness he has always been drawn to. The fact that he is drawn to the wild and its animals is confirmed by the many drawings he makes of them (is there a pun intended? Mervyn loved puns), from a knotted-tail moose (another nonexistent creature) to a cheese-loving shark, from apes, crocodiles and cockatoos to penguins, gulls, polar vultures, puffins and a white crow. His intention in tracking down the great White Lion is not to shoot him, as colonial big game hunters would have done, but to take a picture of him with his box camera, paying homage to his life without depriving him of it; despite his love of museums, he will bring no body home to be stuffed and mounted in a glass case. But the loss of the camera in a snowstorm forces the Uncle instead to make yet more drawings of the Lion when he finds him, a much more bodily form of record-keeping than photography. The artist’s stare that lies behind each sketch – a total commitment to studying the distinctive shape and selfhood of the object at which the artist stares, as Mervyn explains in his little pamphlet on The Craft of the Lead Pencil (1946)[10] – involves a surrender of the self, an immersion in the other, which seems very far from an imperialist attitude. The Uncle is, like Mervyn himself, an itinerant and eccentric artist, and this sets him apart from the Empire far more effectively than his vocation as an explorer.

The Uncle’s relationship with Jackson, too, gradually grows to resemble something like companionship as the story unfolds. The Uncle’s abuse of him, after all, is part of his general irascibility, which he expresses in the language of pirates or whalers. He is constantly using piratical phrases (‘Blubber take this thumb mark’, ‘Hags blubber’, ‘O blubber it’, Oh blubberation’) which fuse his own oversized body with the many targets of his wrath, and he himself is as often the object of his disgust as Jackson is (‘Pickle my blubber!’, he remarks repeatedly, as well as ‘Oh blubber him!’). The Uncle also shares with Jackson a tendency to clumsiness: he stains his own letters with thumb prints, blood from a cut finger and washing up water, as often as Jackson spills soup or coffee over it. If Jackson is feminised by his headscarf, the Uncle feminises himself – in his own opinion – by using a typewriter (‘Pickle my blubber! But it makes me feel like a woman, writing this letter to England’, p. [4]), as well as by his housekeeping and his role as Jackson’s carer. If Jackson does not share the Uncle’s investment in the Arctic Sublime, the Uncle does not share Jackson’s fears or understand his emotions – at least at first. Both are separated from the cultures that reared them, both are isolated in the Polar wastes, both subsist on the same food and share the same rough quarters. The Uncle even has a kind of shell in the form of the eiderdown stuffed full of orchid stalks which he carries with him at all times; and at one point Jackson hides under the eiderdown without the Uncle even noticing. The pair have more in common than the Uncle cares to admit.

As the book goes on, too, the Uncle begins to refer to himself and Jackson as an inseparable unit. In the first half of the book, the Uncle speaks of himself always in the singular, as if all his travels were solitary ones (an Arctic wolf ‘sprang at me’, p. [15], ‘I came to […] a forest of trees that had been frozen into skeletons’, p. [18], ‘the beasts I met with on the way’, p. [20], ‘I’m approaching his dominion’, p. [54]). Jackson is thrust to the margins as if he were no more than a piece of the luggage he carries. Increasingly, though, the Uncle speaks of the pair as ‘us’ and ‘we’, a change that begins in the long twelfth letter which describes the first part of their final approach to the Lion’s lair. On this last stage of his quest the Uncle tends to Jackson’s wounds, shares his burdens, and saves his life on one occasion by pinning him to the ice with his leg-spike moments before the turtle dog slides into a crevasse. On another occasion Jackson must rotate the Uncle’s body, holding onto his sound leg, in order to screw him into the ice and save them both from the devastating force of the tornado; at this point it is the Uncle who serves as an object, the turtle dog who has agency. The Uncle continues to be enraged by Jackson’s obtuseness, but he also shows some sympathy for his feelings; for instance, when the turtle dog is terrified by seeing living fish under the ice beneath their feet the Uncle carries him ‘for quite a long time […] with all our belongings nailed to his back’ (p. [103]). At the climax of their journey, the Uncle and Jackson finally share the same emotions as they scale a snow-covered hill which turns out to be the Lion’s sleeping body: ‘When we reached the top we stared around us, and still could see no reason for the excitement which both of us felt more than ever’ (p. [107], my emphasis). In their isolation from the rest of humankind there’s a growing sense of mutual interdependence about them, which the Uncle can only ever express in action, saving Jackson’s life, binding his wounds, building shelters for them both and cooking their meals while continuing to shower the unfortunate turtle dog with insults.

Their severance from humankind, after all, is also a severance from its dominant narratives, including the narratives that govern hierarchy. The Uncle’s seeming commitment to science, for instance, which manifested itself in his youthful collection of live specimens and his visits to the museum, turns out to be vastly subordinate to his sense of the beautiful and the sublime; the sublime in the Burkean sense being something whose scale and causes cannot be adequately measured, understood or even communicated, the polar opposite of scientific discourse. We’ve already seen how he has become detached from the narrative of imperialism, carrying with him only broken scraps of it embedded in his body and mind. And his seeming connection to his family, through the nephew to whom he addresses his string of letters, only stresses his detachment from familial narratives. The Uncle does not seem to know or care how the nephew is related to him, or his age, or where he lives, or anything about his personality (he may be ‘very stupid’, as the Uncle points out at one point, p. [55]); so that he comes across less as a person than as a necessary manifestation of the old man’s desire to express his yearning for the Lion, a yearning which for most of his life no one else has shared. In his mind, too, the Uncle seems to model this nephew on himself, assuming or hoping that he will be more interested in strange events and wild adventures than in lounges, tables or chairs (at least, when the tables and chairs in question are firmly settled on a middle-class carpet). This invented nephew is as much a rebel against familial narratives as a product of them, and as liable to run away from their constraints as the Uncle himself.

Meanwhile, there seems to be a different narrative at work in the Uncle’s adventures, one to which the Uncle himself is forever marginal. Towards the end of his quest for the Lion one begins to sense that the real action is always happening elsewhere, out of reach of the artist’s pencil or the poet’s typewriter. This feeling starts to develop in the fifth letter, I think, as the Uncle confesses his lack of success in the quest so far. All he has found of the Lion is ‘strange rumours’, he tells us (p. [54]), but he never goes on to explain what these rumours are. He feels he is getting closer, but feelings are all he has, not evidence; he says he has discovered some ‘clues’ but never lists them (p. [63]). His travels have always been marked, in fact, by the Lion’s absence: ‘I scoured the tropics – he wasn’t there. Cancer and Capricorn had never heard of him. I scrutinized every inch of the equator and he wasn’t there, either. […] Sometimes I thought I was nearing his boundaries only to be disappointed’ (pp. [55] and [60]). He is certain, he adds, that ‘something exciting is going to happen tomorrow’ (p. [60]), but nine more days pass without incident (‘I can’t think why nothing important is happening because I am sure I am close to the White Lion’, he complains on day five, p. [63]), and when something does take place, it happens off stage. A swarm of wailing, hand-wringing creatures hurries across the snow past the Uncle and Jackson, turning the snow black with their bodies, like a sheet of paper being blackened by ink, but we never find out what is being written on the page or what ‘tragedy’ they are running from. The sea-elephants, on the other hand, seem to know all about it, since they break through the Arctic ice after the creatures’ passing and begin to ‘bellow […] as though they also knew that there was a tragedy happening somewhere which they had only just heard about’ (p. [65]). Knowledge is power, an imperialist might say, but in the latter stages of the Uncle’s narrative knowledge is always possessed by the nonhuman other.

The reference in this, the eleventh letter, to some unseen ‘tragedy’ invokes a piece of high culture, something that might have been penned by some Polar Aeschylus or Sophocles. From this point on, further works of high culture reveal themselves in the Arctic wastes, detached from the contexts that shape such artefacts in the fields we know. A sudden wind blows up, lifting the snow for miles around into a mile-high column which suddenly collapses to create a pyramid of snow, invoking some lost nonhuman civilization. Lights appear beneath an expanse of translucent ice as they are crossing it, turning the surface into a vast piece of stained glass not made by human hands (pp. [101-103]). A seeming ‘city of glass churches’ appears on the horizon (p. [100]), the biggest of which the Uncle dubs ‘the shining cathedral’ (p. [104]): monuments to an unknown religion, whose architects, priests and worshippers are not human. In this cathedral gathers a host of polar animals to witness the final act of the mysterious Emperor of the Snows; among them are representatives of all the strange species we have encountered in the book, as well as many others. These creatures know, it seems, what’s about to happen, and the Uncle and Jackson do not share this knowledge. All the same, they take their place in the congregation, finally united with the beings they have fought against and consumed throughout their journey. They are abruptly animals alongside other animals, and in this capacity the Uncle sets aside all prior narratives in favour of witnessing the Lion’s last act without speculating on its purpose, meaning, or significance to science.

The White Lion is the final work of high culture they encounter, a work that declares its independence from imperialist discourse. The Uncle’s obsession with the beast was never rooted in a colonial rationale; from the start his quest was deeply unscientific, based on the image on a stamp and his youthful delight in drawing the four lion statues in Trafalgar Square, one after the other, without noticing until the end that they were all identical. His search for the Lion has strayed with anarchic randomness from one extreme of the earth’s environment to the other, from the equator to the Pole – scarcely a Darwinian journey towards enlightenment. The beast’s whiteness may seem to make it an icon of white supremacy, but the all-encompassing whiteness of the Poles and many of their animal inhabitants ensure that whiteness in this story is not exclusive; rather it’s a sign of infinite possibility, like the whiteness of unpainted canvas or unmarked paper. The Lion’s shape recalls the various uses of the lion as an imperialist symbol, not least in the lion statues of Trafalgar Square; the Lion’s title supports this association. Lions in Mervyn’s work, however, are without exception past their prime, if they ever had one: from Headmaster Bellgrove in Gormenghast (1950), whose face resembles that of a lion with bad teeth, to the idiotic but self-satisfied lion in the play Noah’s Ark (1950s); from the enslaved lion-man in the novella Boy in Darkness (1956), who crumbles to dust as he unleashes his last roar, to the battered toy protagonist of Burgess Drake’s children’s novel The Book of Lyonne (1952), which Peake illustrated, who keeps a boy’s pyjamas in his zip-up tummy, favours ‘Demi-cratic’ principles and ‘listens to the voice of the Common People’ (p. 258) instead of imposing his will on his fellow toys.[11] The Lion in Letters from a Lost Uncle has a throne in an ice cathedral, cementing his status as King of Beasts and perhaps invoking the Lion of Judah, a figure of Christ. But he is blind (like the monstrous Lamb in Boy in Darkness) and ‘ready to die’, as the Uncle sees the moment he sets eyes on him (p. [112]). Having stalked to the ice cathedral – which is also a stage, with the animal audience arranged in tiers as if in a Greek or Roman amphitheatre – the Lion rears up, gives a final roar, and transforms itself into another work of art, a sculpture made of ice. All its cultural and religious resonances are at this stage consigned to the past, and it becomes a sublime spectacle, powerful only in its emotional and aesthetic impact on those who see it first hand after an arduous journey, such as the Uncle’s quest. Its ‘long and fabulous […] life’ (p. [117]), about which we have learned nothing, comes to an end, leaving only the fables of the Uncle’s, Jackson’s and now the reader’s imagination.

The White Lion, then, invokes a world in which old narratives have come to an end. The Uncle, too, is old, and has passed on his vision of the Lion’s death to a new generation – embodied in his nephew – to make of it what they wish. Soon afterwards the Uncle himself merges with the Arctic landscape, just as the beast did. We don’t know where he is going; we only know that he has been liberated from the quest that has driven him so far. The ‘Last Letter’ ends with him sharpening his leg-spike (now a ‘sword-spike’, like the weapon of some quixotic knight, p. [127]) and setting off into the snow to collect a wolf-skin from one of the carcasses slain in a fight between wolves and reindeer. Jackson has been ‘excited’ by the fight (p. [126]), while the Uncle regards it as nothing special after the spectacle of the Lion’s death – a direct reversal of their usual emotional reactions. But the letter’s final page shows the Uncle and Jackson side by side beneath an Arctic sky in which hangs an array of strange signs resembling waves and compass roses, a hint at further sublimity to come. The fact that we do not know what shape that sublimity will take makes of the book’s ending an opening out from the narrow bounds of Empire, and of imperial narratives of all kinds. The fact that both the Uncle and Jackson are shown on this page as tiny, insignificant figures (and the Uncle seems to be waving goodbye with his harpoon) clears a space for new protagonists – perhaps without the Uncle’s unsettling traits, though presumably with plenty of new ones of their own – to perform in the paper theatres of the future. In fact, the last few pages of Mervyn’s book repeatedly show the Uncle and Jackson side by side and dwarfed by the wonders of the North. By the end these wonders have taken centre stage, like the Lion, and their part human, part animal witnesses have dwindled to the size of the wailing and hand-wringing little creatures that swarmed over the horizon at the start of the final phase of the Uncle’s journey.

There is nothing in art or literature, I think, remotely like Letters from a Lost Uncle, but it is packed with clear allusions to other works of art and literature. Its creation through word and image of two new mythic beings, the Uncle and Jackson, invokes the work of one of Mervyn’s heroes, William Blake. There are echoes here, too, of Moby Dick (1851), whose plot is equally simple and involves a quest for a mysterious white whale: the Uncle has a missing leg, like Captain Ahab, and substitutes for it a prosthesis fashioned from a narwhal’s tusk (Ahab uses a whalebone’s jaw). William Heath Robinson’s The Adventures of Uncle Lubin (1902) involves an uncle’s quest to find his baby nephew, little Peter, who was stolen by a wicked bagbird – a quest that takes him through lands as many and various as the districts traversed by Mervyn’s adventurer; it seems possible that Heath Robinson’s uncle and nephew inspired Peake to place an Uncle and his absent nephew at the core of his narrative. And then there is J. M. Barrie’s Peter and Wendy (1911), whose protagonist is trapped like the Uncle in a perpetual cycle of irresponsible action and wild adventure. Mervyn’s Lost Uncle taps, too, into his lifelong love of pirates (his missing limb and nautical turn of phrase invoke Long John Silver or Captain Hook) and Western movies (since he is a nameless, solitary hero perpetually on the move, accompanied only by a sidekick whose principal functions are to carry his things and be rescued from danger). The high cultural aspect of the Uncle’s quest is, then, commingled with images from popular culture, so that it invokes both Don Quixote with his sidekick Sancho Panza[12] and the Lone Ranger with his sidekick Tonto,[13] both Robinson Crusoe with his indigenous companion Friday and the mendicant odd couples of cinema, such as Laurel and Hardy, or of the stage, such as Estragon and Vladimir in Waiting for Godot (1952). Several of these relationships involve the same kind of abuse as the Uncle’s with Jackson, troublingly bound together with mutual dependence and intermittent signs of real affection.

At the same time, the book is linked to the lives of the Peakes in ways that go far beyond the Uncle’s status as a migrant artist. The igloos he builds recall an igloo Mervyn built for his sons, Sebastian and Fabian, in the garden of their house on Sark, while the Uncle’s adventures recall the pictures Mervyn drew for the boys each Sunday in a series of exercise books known as ‘The Sunday Books’, full of pirates, indigenous Americans, ships and animals. The boys proposed the subjects of the pictures and Mervyn wove them into his stories; there are even some stamps among the sketches, one (perhaps) drawn for Sebastian, full of things beginning with B (a bus, a bull, a bicycle, a cricket bat, a baby), another for Fabian, as well as a lion which closely resembles the ‘lion on the stamp’ as depicted on the dustjacket of Letters from a Lost Uncle.[14] In addition, the back cover of the dustjacket bears the image of a wax seal stamped with the names ‘Sebastian, Fabian, Maeve’, as if to confirm that the contents have been sent out into the world from their island home. There’s even an in-joke in the narrative which could only have been appreciated by members of the family and some of their friends: the name of the ship on which the Uncle sails, the S. S. Em, invokes the acronym S. S. M., which stands for the School for the Sons of Missionaries – Eltham College – which Mervyn attended in his boyhood.[15] The Uncle, meanwhile, joins the parade of bizarre relatives Mervyn wrote about throughout his career, most notably the Uncles and Aunts he mentions in the poems ‘How Good It Is to Be Alone’, ‘My Uncle Paul of Pimlico’, ‘It Makes a Change’, ‘What a Day It’s Been’, ‘Uncle George’, ‘The Threads Remain’, ‘Crown Me with Hairpins’ and above all ‘Aunts and Uncles’, which contains a list of eccentric characters most of whom are transformed into animals.[16]

Letters from a Lost Uncle, then, is rooted in the moment of its creation, the immediate postwar period when the future could be said to have opened up as it opens up at the end of Mervyn’s book. It draws deeply on literary and artistic history as well as on the history of Mervyn’s family, and marks a point when post-imperial possibilities point towards a potentially vibrant future from a shabby present and a dishonourable British past. Its calculatedly chaotic and improvised nature – with its typos, blots and scribbled handwritten corrections and annotations – insist on the fact that the next moment in time or history cannot be predicted, since all familiar narratives have been disrupted. It is in a sense post-apocalyptic, like Dominic Hill’s 2026 production of Waiting for Godot at the Citizen’s Theatre in Glasgow. Apocalypse takes place in it, in the form of baffling signs and portents, and the Uncle and Jackson tramp their way past them into the unwritten time to come. It’s therefore also a key work of the mid-twentieth century, and one that continues to resonate in our own apparently apocalyptic moment. It deserves, and badly needs, a new edition.

My own beloved copy, bought in 1977.

Bibliographical note

My essay ends with that last sentence. What follows is a bibliographical note about an error that occurs in all known editions of Letters from a Lost Uncle, and you should only read on if you have a copy (digital or analogue) and are interested in the question of whether or not your copy is accurate. I would suggest that it is not, because as far as I can make out no copy of the book has ever been correctly printed. I shall explain this contention here.

It’s widely accepted by Mervyn’s biographers that he was unhappy with the single edition of the book that appeared in his lifetime, for reasons he gave in a letter quoted by John Watney in his early biography: first, Mervyn didn’t think much of the way the book was printed, and secondly, he was annoyed that the price on the dustjacket had been altered from seven shillings and sixpence to three shillings and sixpence, ‘thus giving the book a second-hand look from the very outset’.[17] One error he didn’t mention, however, was that some pages of the first edition had been printed in the wrong order. I first noticed this when I started puzzling over one of the Uncle’s handwritten comments, scribbled under a drawing on p. [5] of my edition (the unpaginated Picador edition of 1977, which largely reproduces the first edition of 1948). ‘I’d forgotten’, the Uncle writes, ‘that I’d already drawn a sea-elephant – not that it matters’. My edition had no drawing of a sea-elephant on any of the preceding pages; the only other such drawing in the book occurs at the top of p. [11], which shows a ‘sea-leopard’  [i.e. a leopard seal] and an elephant-seal, both carefully labelled. I then noticed that the typed prose on p. [11] begins with the word ‘and’ with a lower-case ‘a’, suggesting that the sentence has been carried over from the page before. At the same time, p. [10] ends with a full stop, which means this cannot have been the page that was meant to precede p. [11]. P. [4] of my edition, on the other hand, ends with an unfinished sentence: ‘Not only this, but what with Jackson to be unloaded before he curls up to sleep, and what with my leg-spike to polish’, followed by an ellipsis; and the sentence on p. [11] completes it perfectly: ‘and the sea-leopard stew to prepare for supper, I can’t think why I began this letter tonight of all times’. This suggests that p. [11] – along with p. [12], which follows on from it seamlessly – should actually be pp. [5]-[6].

I would also suggest that pp. [5]-[6] in my edition should in fact be pp. [11]-[12] – in other words, that both pairs of pages have been accidentally transposed. This is more difficult to justify, but the transposition makes sense for a number of reasons. First, the existing p. [5] ends with a handwritten note saying that the Uncle had forgotten he had already drawn an elephant seal (which he here calls a ‘sea-elephant’ before correcting himself to ‘elephant-seal’, presumably because his first drawing of it was labelled with the latter term). It seems unlikely the Uncle would have forgotten this between making the drawing on p. [5] and a drawing only two pages later in the same opening letter. Secondly, if the current pp. [5]-[6] were repositioned as pp. [11]-[12] the portrait of the Uncle on p. [12] (previously p. [6]) would be followed by his detailed discussion of it on p. [13]: ‘Even if the drawing of me isnt a speaking likeness, I do know that I have only one eye’ etc. The lead-up to the portrait on p. [6] makes better sense, too, if we move pp. [5]-[6] to pp. [11]-[12]. On p. [10] the Uncle writes ‘Perhaps you have never heard of me before?’, and the swap would mean he follows this comment with the detailed verbal description that’s currently on p. [5], and with the drawing of himself on the current p. [6]. The description would then be completed by his further discussion of the drawing on p. [13].

It’s worth mentioning one more thing that would need correcting in any new edition of Letters, and this is the fact that no edition after the first has reprinted pp. [24]-[25] as they appeared in the first edition (drawings from these missing pages were added to the endpapers of the book’s second edition of 1976, but are not present in any later ones). These pages were originally removed, G. Peter Winnington suggests, to reduce the length of the book to the standard 132-page format.[18]

I can imagine a new and perfect edition of Letters from a Lost Uncle, but only time will tell if it can ever come into existence. The problem is made worse by the alterations in pen which Mervyn made to some of his pencil drawings in his last illness; these have changed the look of the drawings radically, and a reprint would need to consider whether to keep these alterations, in recognition of his changing abilities as he succumbed to Parkinson’s Disease, or whether to return instead to the first edition as the most finished edition we possess, making only one change, which is to swap the two transposed sets of pages. Of course if you have a first edition you could simply read it in the new order I’ve suggested. But do read it, in whatever version you can get hold of.

NOTES

[1] Maeve Gilmore, A World Away (1970), in Mervyn Peake: Two Lives (London: Vintage, 1999), p. 4.

[2] Clare Peake, Under a Canvas Sky: Living Outside Gormenghast (London: Constable, 2011), p. 23, quoting Patricia Herington, who was the Peakes’ neighbour as a child. Also quoted in Lucy Scholes, Maeve Gilmore, Modern Women Artists (n.p.: Eiderdown Books, 2026), p. 36. Scholes gives a detailed account of Maeve’s murals in the Peakes’ Chelsea home on pp. 36-39.

[3] Mervyn Peake, Letters from a Lost Uncle (from Polar Regions), Picador (London: Pan Books, 1977), p. [12]. All references are to this edition, which is unpaginated; I’ve therefore supplied page numbers in square brackets throughout.

[4] G. Peter Winnington, Mervyn Peake’s Vast Alchemies: The Illustrated Biography (London: Peter Owen, 2009), p. 228.

[5] From The Drawings of Mervyn Peake (London: Grey Walls Press, 1949), cited in Mervyn Peake: Writings and Drawings, ed. Maeve Gilmore and Shelagh Johnson (London: Academy Editions and New York: St Martin’s Press, 1974), p. 80.

[6] See M. C. Rast, ‘Ireland’s sister nations’: internationalism and sectarianism in the Irish struggle for independence, 1916–22’, Journal of Global History, 2015, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp. 479-501.

[7] In fact, George VI lost his title ‘Emperor of India’ when India won independence in 1947, the year before the book was published.

[8] Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens tells us that Peter ran away (by flying out of the nursery window) ‘when he was seven days old’, and that as a result his age is always one week. J. M. Barrie, Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens and Peter and Wendy, Oxford World Classics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), p. 12.

[9] ‘The Men in Bowler Hats are Sweet’, in Mervyn Peake, Complete Nonsense, ed. R. W. Maslen and G. Peter Winnington, Fyfield Books (Manchester: Carcanet, 2011), p. 148. Cf the final stanza:

The Men in Bowler Hats are sweet
Beneath their bowler hats.
It’s not their fault if, in the heat
Of their Transactions; I repeat,
It’s not their fault if Vampires meet
And gurgle in their spats.

[10] ‘HOW TO STARE […] Scrutinize the object for a long while. Try to understand its shape, its solidity, or outline, or texture, or whatever it is that interests you about it – and then after the long stare – when you know what you want to record, begin.’ Mervyn Peake, The Craft of the Lead Pencil (London: Allan Wingate, 1946), pp. 2-3.

[11] The Book of Lyonne features a tortoise who looks exactly like Jackson in Mervyn’s illustration, down to the kerchief he wears around his head. See Burgess Drake, The Book of Lyonne (London: The Falcon Press, 1952), p. 21.

[12] The Peakes owned a copy of Don Quixote illustrated by Gustave Doré. See Sebastian Peake, Child of Bliss, in Mervyn Peake: Two Lives […] pp. 203-5.

[13] The two Lone Ranger movie serials of 1938 and 1939 were shown in UK cinemas at the time. The original Lone Ranger radio show was never broadcast in the UK.

[14] While the B picture seems to have been drawn as part of an alphabet – there is also a stamp showing objects beginning with A – I think it was drawn for Sebastian, because the capital B in it has been modified to become an anagram of SP, i.e. S[ebastian] P[eake]. The stamp I’m identifying as Fabian’s shows a boy in the cabin of a locomotive alongside the driver; the boy has blond hair, like Fabian, whereas Sebastian’s was brown. See Mervyn Peake and Michael Moorcock, The Sunday Books (London and New York: Duckworth Overlook, 2011), pp. 36-7 and p. 38. A stamp showing objects beginning with A appears on p. 130. For the lion that resembles the lion on the stamp see p. 93.

[15] See Winnington, Mervyn Peake’s Vast Alchemies, p. 228.

[16] See Mervyn Peake, Complete Nonsense, ed. R. W. Maslen and G. Peter Winnington, Fyfield Books (Manchester: Carcanet, 2011), pp. 71-3, 86, 88, 90, 113, 123, 220 and 150-3.

[17] John Watney, Mervyn Peake (London: Abacus, 1977) p. 103.

[18] See G. Peter Winnington’s bibliographical account of Letters from a Lost Uncle in his essential list of Peake’s work in print, available on the Peake Studies website here [https://peakestudies.com/parta.htm].

William Heath Robinson, The Adventures of Uncle Lubin (1902)

Some of my blog posts begin in one place and end somewhere completely different. This is a case in point. I started writing with the intention of talking about Mervyn Peake’s picture book Letters from a Lost Uncle from Polar Regions (1948), then started thinking about Peake’s debt to Heath Robinson’s much older book, and found myself with so much to say that the Peake post risked sinking under the weight of its excess Heath Robinson cargo. In any case I need to get a copy of the latest edition of the Letters to make my point about it properly, and I’ve used up my book allowance for the month, so here’s something on Heath Robinson instead.

Heath Robinson is best known now for designing elaborate machines to perform simple or surprising tasks; the term ‘a Heath Robinson contraption’ has entered the English language, and is still being used even by those who have never seen his drawings. His art, in other words, spills out of its confines within the pages of printed books to invade the world, introducing a new concept into everyday use, providing copy for magazines and advertising campaigns, appearing on crockery for children in the 1920s, lending its name to a code-breaking machine at Bletchley Park, and reshaping the history of film. Caractacus Potts uses Heath Robinson contraptions to make breakfast, manufacture sweeties and cut hair in the movie Chitty Chitty Bang Bang (1968), and the car of the title is a Heath Robinson contraption which takes on a life of its own, beginning as a straightforward Potts project to refurbish a vintage automobile and going on to become a flying, ocean-going, sentient vehicle that can put down tyrannies. The inventor Wallace in the Wallace and Gromit movies designs Heath Robinson contraptions to meet his needs, and many of those contraptions escape the limits of what they were made for, as in The Wrong Trousers (1993), where the titular piece of clothing goes rogue on the orders of a criminal penguin. Heath Robinson’s own inventions extend the interior space of buildings into the open air, allow weddings to take place in aeroplanes with the celebrant perched on a steeple, and enable the great monoliths of Stonehenge to tiptoe across Salisbury Plain while being used as camouflage by British troops on a training exercise. His inventions invoke the hectic inventiveness of the first half of the twentieth century, when domestic and urban time and space burst out of their previously stable boundaries, transforming the old into the sometimes ridiculously new, and catching ordinary men, women and children in an ever-expanding web of innovative technologies.

Heath Robinson’s penchant for eccentric technology is often traced to the first of his books for which he both wrote the words and drew the pictures, The Adventures of Uncle Lubin (1902).[1] There are improvised inventions in this book – a balloon driven to the moon by a crude propellor, a submarine which seems slightly too small to accommodate its pilot – but the most striking thing about Heath Robinson’s story is the tendency of familiar objects in it to take on a life and character of their own, from footwear and hats to umbrellas, swords, blunderbusses, birds, fish and babies (the last three being honorary objects thanks to their inarticulacy). Most strikingly of all, the illustrated book as object acquires a life of its own in Heath Robinson’s hands, its decorations taking control of the story instead of merely embellishing it. Look closely at Heath Robinson’s visual embellishments to Uncle Lubin and you’ll find that they have as many adventures as the old man of the title, enmeshing him in a dynamic, ever-changing universe where anything – or rather, any thing – can steer his narrative in unexpected directions on a whim. Things, in fact, have whims in Uncle Lubin, thus identifying the century at the beginning of which the book was published as one in which human beings would find themselves possessed and their fortunes steered by the unexpected agency of the objects they owned.

Heath Robinson’s picture book tells the story of an elderly uncle whose baby nephew, little Peter, is stolen by a wicked bag-bird while in his care. The bag-bird’s act of thievery succeeds on account of Uncle Lubin’s negligence – the old man was dozing when it happened – so Lubin must pursue the child across every region of the world, and beyond it, to atone for his lapse. His adventures involve difficult journeys, on foot and in gimcrack vessels, as far as the moon, the ‘Land of Chilblains’ (which looks much like one of the Poles), the depths of the ocean and an orientalised Eastern kingdom, before being reunited with little Peter in the final chapter. The book is organised into twelve short chapters or ‘Adventures’, and the twelve-part structure aligns it with the great English-language epics modelled on Virgil’s Aeneid, such as Spenser’s unfinished Faerie Queene or Milton’s Paradise Lost. There’s an imaginative ambition to it, in other words, which belies its short length and youthful readership, and suggests it is somehow larger than the sum of its parts. It strains at its seams, I’d suggest, and Heath Robinson makes the notion of bursting out of narrow confines the presiding principle of his composition.

This is largely the result of Heath Robinson’s games with the form and conventions of the Victorian illustrated novel. His book has a full-colour frontispiece (in the first edition), followed by title page, dedication, list of pictures and list of chapters (or ‘Adventures’), each richly decorated with drawings in black and white. Each Adventure has its own title page, and each pair of facing pages in each chapter includes a full-page framed illustration on the right, and a decorative initial capital on the left, followed by a carefully typeset text with a pen-and-ink drawing in the margin. There are also three wordless ‘display cases’, so to speak: two-page framed illustrations depicting some of the more significant moments in the Uncle’s travels. So far so conventional. But Robinson’s initial capitals and pen-and-ink drawings exist in complex dialogue with the framed illustrations that face them. The initial capital sometimes alters or expands upon some element of the framed illustration, while the drawing sometimes alludes to a quite different moment in Lubin’s adventures, not always implied by either the framed illustration or the accompanying text. The effect is that Robinson’s narrative spills out of the confines of the formal publishing conventions it follows. The carefully ruled borders of the largest illustrations cannot restrain the inventiveness of the artist’s pen, which finds new and surprising angles on the narrative in the marginal drawings, the initial capitals, and even the ornaments that decorate the other pages. The book’s visual images augment the verbal text rather than illustrating it; they tell a larger and more complex story, which implies that the narrative contained in the text is by no means a sufficient account of the dynamic world through which Lubin moves, and to which he responds with such improvisatory enthusiasm.

There are continuities, too, in the pictures which are not mentioned in the verbal text, but will quickly be picked up by the sharp-eyed observer. The recurrence of impish birds, for instance, suggests that an ornithological version of the story runs alongside the human one.[2] The wicked bag-bird first shows up in the title page of the first adventure, then again in the top left-hand corner of the first framed illustration in the book on p. 3, a gigantic quasi-saurian presence to which Lubin seems oblivious as he sings to his howling nephew in the vain hope of lulling him to sleep. The bird then takes over several pages of framed illustrations and marginal drawings, while also taking over the child and popping him into the bag beneath its beak. This bag, incidentally, makes it the first of many animated objects in the narrative, an airborne version of the capacious carpet bag Lubin carries with him on some of his adventures.

For a while the wicked bag-bird is the only bird in the book. Then abruptly there is another: a crudely fashioned little bird on top of a weathercock surmounting the mast of Uncle Lubin’s ‘beautiful boat’ in the third adventure (p. 25). The bird on the weathercock reappears in adventure number five, now attached incongruously to the mast of Uncle Lubin’s submarine (p. 47). Another living bird, meanwhile – this time (seemingly) a young bag-bird – appears on the title page of the fourth adventure, and again in the marginal drawing that follows, watching with interest as Lubin’s boat gets ‘frozen up’ in the Land of Chilblains (p. 38). The bag-bird itself appears soon after on an elongated iceberg (p. 40), still with little Peter in its beak-bag, and gets the better of Uncle Lubin once again; it seems more at home in the Poles than he is, which is presumably why its young are to be found there. In the sixth adventure Lubin meets a flock of seagulls in his submarine (now bereft of its weathercock) (p. 59), one of which watches him again with interest as he talks to a little mer-boy; again, they are more at home at sea than Lubin is, though his persistence in entering their natural environment seems to intrigue them.

So far, the birds seem to exist alongside Lubin, not interacting with him except when the wicked bag-bird gets involved. Then in the eighth adventure the nature of Lubin’s association with birds begins to change. Caught in a storm, Lubin seeks shelter under a tree and begins to climb it as the flood waters rise. In the first framed illustration of the chapter (p. 75), a tiny featherless chick flies through the rain (despite its lack of feathers) towards the adventurer, and perches in the second framed illustration on the crown of his hat. As the waters continue to rise the chick remains safely on the hat (p. 77), until in one marginal drawing only the crown of Lubin’s hat remains above the surface (p. 78), with the chick still perched on it; Lubin has become the chick’s protector, just as he sought to be the protector of his little nephew. In the final framed illustration of the chapter, Lubin climbs into his battered umbrella and sails safely away through the flooded landscape (p. 81), while the chick crows in triumph from his hat as if in celebration of the old man’s resourcefulness. The final picture in the chapter is a drawing of the chick in the middle of an empty page (p. 82), still crowing, perhaps in gratitude to its rescuer. There is no mention of the chick in the text of the chapter, but one gets a sense from the pictures that some corner has been turned in Lubin’s relationship with the natural world, and with birds in particular.

Sure enough, from this moment on Lubin’s connection to his feathered friends becomes a genial one. In the tenth adventure, three swallows fly around Lubin as he falls asleep in a seaside meadow (p. 93), and the happy dream that follows – in which he sees little Peter crowned King of the Fairies (pp. 94 and 95) – is full of tiny wings, as if inspired by the swallows. And the twelfth and final adventure features another of the recurring trees in the narrative (the first was the one he dozed under in his first adventure), a coconut palm, which drops a shower of coconuts on his head as he walks under it (p. 111). Unmentioned in the text, another little naked chick – larger than the one in the eighth adventure – falls on his head along with the coconuts, and a marginal drawing shows chick and man confronting each other (p. 110); the chick seems to be smiling in delight at being reunited with its elderly friend. The chick appears again, drawn much larger as if to emphasize its rapid maturation, in the following marginal drawing, and the framed illustration opposite shows Uncle Lubin climbing the palm tree to find out (as the text tells us) ‘who it was that could be so rude as to throw cocoa-nuts at him’ (p. 110). But the illustrations suggest he has another motive: he may be looking for the nest from which the chick came, and the bird, perhaps a bag-bird, that built it. He is also making the final gesture of solidarity with the birds; he saved a bird’s life in adventure number eight, and now he is climbing to the bird’s own home, which we might suspect will prove to be somehow Lubin’s home as well as the bag-bird’s.

Sure enough (again), in the final framed illustration of the adventure he finds a nest full of little bag-chicks with Peter in the midst of them, ‘warm and cosy and safe and sound’ (p. 114) – certainly more so than the little lost chicks we have encountered in the rest of the narrative. Lubin takes him home, of course, and the final drawing of the wicked bag-bird – all alone in the middle of an otherwise empty page (p. 116) – shows it weeping, clearly heartbroken at having lost its human protegé. The bag-bird, then, has its own story, one not explicitly told in Heath Robinson’s text. It is no less affectionate than Uncle Lubin, and no less lax in its childminding duties, though it has a ruder sense of humour (it laughs at him when it escapes him, still carrying Peter, on the moon and in the Land of Chilblains). If, then, it is a kind of alternative Lubin – who also has a bag, like the bag-bird, as I pointed out – then this final picture might well imply that it will act on its feelings and pursue little Peter through thick and thin, perhaps even stealing him back so that the story can begin all over again. Heath Robinson tells us at the end of the final adventure that Uncle Lubin and his nephew ‘got home quite safely and lived happily ever after’ (p. 114); but even if the text does not tell us anything about the return of the wicked bag-bird, the recommencement of Uncle Lubin’s adventures can reasonably be anticipated in spite of the apparent closure offered in these final words. After all, birds have been absent from the verbal text throughout the book, with the sole exception of the wicked bag-bird itself, yet we have seen them often in the pictures. Words don’t tell us everything; we need pictures, too, to make sense of the world in which we find ourselves. What the pictures tell us, as the text does not, is that Uncle Lubin and the bag-bird are in the end doubles of each other, which means that the bag-bird is not so wicked after all – unless one considers persistence in rescuing lost young things from perceived danger as a form of wickedness.

As I’ve suggested, other objects besides birds recur in Heath Robinson’s story, often finding their epiphanic moments in the narrative long after we’ve first encountered them. And in many cases, what they do at these moments is very different from what we might have expected (much like the wicked bag-bird, which turns out to be over-affectionate and mischievous rather than malevolent). Uncle Lubin carries a blunderbuss or gun, for instance, in the second adventure (p. 13), but he doesn’t use it in anger until the eleventh, when he shoots at a wasp that has settled on a Rajah’s nose (pp. 102-103); and it’s not the projectiles in his gun that drive off the wasp but the noise it makes when it ‘bursts’ to pieces (p. 104). In the third adventure he has an accordion strapped to his back (p. 25), which gets played for the first time in the ninth adventure, when he uses it to charm a dragon-snake (p. 87); this is a fairly conventional use of a musical instrument, of course, but the usual tool for snake-seduction is a pipe. His umbrella, which first appears in the second adventure as one of the items in his balloon (p. 13), finds its most effective use in the eighth adventure, when he turns it upside down and uses it as a boat to escape a flood, in anticipation of Winnie-the-Pooh. He carries a battered sword in several adventures (p. 39), but it only gets used in a story from Lubin’s past, and then not by Lubin himself. The story involves the boy Lubin’s encounter with a ‘funny little old man’ in an outsized hat, who emerges from the snow wielding a similar blade and threatening in terrible tones to ‘cut you to pieces’ (p. 70), upon which the boy Lubin sensibly runs away. The old man’s hat, slippers and nose resemble Uncle Lubin’s, and this together with his sword suggests that young Lubin has somehow encountered a ferocious alternative version of his future self – a self against which he has gone on to define his gentle adult personality.

Even Lubin’s hat has its own adventures. It becomes a parachute when he needs to escape from the moon after his hot air balloon has been punctured by one of its horns (p. 21), serves as a house in two of the ornamental drawings (p. 1 and two pages earlier), and provides a template for the many other flamboyant hats that feature in the book, such as the feathered cavalier’s hat worn by the swordsman Vammadopper in the third adventure (p. 23), the boy Lubin’s straw hat in the seventh (p. 65) – a smaller, less permanent version of the adult Lubin’s headwear – and the even smaller conical hats worn by two old fairy gentlemen in the double-page framed illustration, ‘Uncle Lubin’s Dream of Little Peter’ (pp. 94-5). Lubin’s footwear, meanwhile, undergoes several adventurous transformations. Sometimes he wears shoes with buckles and bows; sometimes hobnailed boots; but most often slippers, which suffer various travails in the course of his exploits, falling off one by one when he’s on the moon (pp. 17 and 21), lying discarded in the grass when he has his dream (p. 93), and featuring on his coat-of-arms in the final framed illustration of the book, alongside his hat and little Peter’s bottle (p. 117). In that coat-of-arms, objects stand in for the central persons in the narrative, which reinforces our sense that things have an active role to play in shaping Lubin’s fortunes.[3]

The adventures of Uncle Lubin, in other words, are also the adventures of the things and creatures and people he encounters, which sometimes take central stage in a book ostensibly dedicated to Uncle Lubin. Besides the implied stories contained in the pictures, three inset stories get told in both words and images that have nothing at all to do with the central quest: about Vammadopper and the giant (p. 28ff.), the impudent Mer-Boy and his schoolmaster (p. 58ff.) and the boy Lubin and the savage old man (p. 66ff.). There is the potential, then, for an endless series of adventures in Robinson’s little volume: adventures in clothing, adventures in natural history, adventures in the imaginative repurposing of things, and the many random adventures of the strangers one meets from day to day.

Robinson was clearly keenly aware of this potential for an infinite expansion of his picture-book. At the head of the List of Adventures there is a drawing of Uncle Lubin reading a massive tome whose spine gives its title as ‘ADVENTURES VOL. 5,000’. The possibilities for adventure generated by linked words and images are clearly unlimited, never to be contained within the confines of any literary or artistic structure. The mind, after all, continually spins its own narratives out of the ones on offer, both in waking life and in dreams – the life of dreams being duly represented in Robinson’s book by the dream Lubin has about little Peter among the fairies, which opens a door onto other books as well as oneiric states of mind. Lubin’s dream invokes the little kidnapped Indian boy in Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream, just as the little mer-boy invokes Charles Kingsley’s famous children’s book The Water Babies and the dragon-snake invokes the Arabian Nights, which Heath Robinson was illustrating as he worked on Uncle Lubin (he had already illustrated Charles and Mary Lamb’s Tales from Shakespeare by the time he published his picture book, and he went on to illustrate Kingsley’s novel in 1915). Uncle Lubin himself is a Don Quixote figure, heroic and absurd in equal measure, reminding us that the artist’s interpretation of Cervantes came out in the same year as his own self-authored book for children. Heath Robinson and his illustrations interact with other authors and their illustrators – Arthur Rackham, Gustave Doré, Walter Crane, Mabel Lucie Atwell and the rest – as well as with the other products of the writer-artist’s own fertile brain. They spiral centrifugally outwards from Uncle Lubin to take in adjacent volumes in Heath Robinson’s imaginative library.

The adventure of the little mer-boy, for instance, which occupies the central pages of the book, finds itself extended in many directions as we read. Lubin meets the mer-boy in one of the eccentric machines – a submarine – which he builds to help him in his quest for his nephew. The child looks very much like his nephew Peter, except that Peter is nearly always crying in the pictures Robinson draws of him, whereas the mer-boy is nearly always laughing or smiling. He first appears on the title page of the Sixth Adventure, along with a decorative capital M (for Mer-boy) that shows a fish with a gaping mouth, and mer-boys and gaping fishes proceed to proliferate through the successive pages: in the decorative capitals (which show more gaping fishes on pp. 56 and 58) and marginal pictures (which show mer-boys on pp. 56, 58 and 62) as well as in the framed illustrations (most of which show both). The first of the framed illustrations for the chapter shows Lubin underwater, trying to drive the mer-boy away from his submarine by waving his umbrella at him (p. 57), watched by several other mer-boys and gaping fishes; there is a crab in the bottom left-hand corner of the illustration (Uncle Lubin’s unwonted crabbiness in this picture aligns him with another famous inventor and submariner, Captain Nemo). In the next framed illustration Lubin’s submarine has surfaced and Lubin has become fascinated by the mer-boy (p. 59), who tells him a story as a passing seabird looks on. The next two pages form a double-page framed illustration, showing a school for mer-boys in which an elderly merman is explaining the properties of a toy, a ‘humming-top’, while the largest fish we have seen so far approaches him from behind (pp. 60-61).[4] In the following framed picture the fish has begun to swallow the unfortunate merman, while the mer-boys do ‘nothing but laugh’, as the mer-boy tells Lubin (p. 63 and p. 62). Opposite the picture of the merman being swallowed, a marginal picture shows a mer-boy being bitten on the tail by a crab exactly like the one we saw in the first framed illustration of the adventure (p. 62); above him, the decorative capital shows a mer-boy emerging from a shell, like a hermit crab looking for a new residence. The final picture of the adventure – an ornament in the middle of a blank page – shows Lubin himself upside down in the hatch of his submarine, his slippered feet waving in the air (p. 64), as if in imitation of the merman, who was swallowed head first by the fish so that his undulating tail, skinny body and splayed hands were all that could be seen of him. What are we to make of this procession of images, and how do they interact with the accompanying text?

The adventure suggests some of the ways in which Heath Robinson’s verbal text and the pictures he draws generate one another, in a mutual process that refuses to prioritise text over pictures or pictures over text. The mer-boy, for instance, with his link to gaping fishes, seems to have had his origin in one of the pictures Heath Robinson drew for the previous adventure, ‘The Sea-Serpent’. A marginal drawing in that adventure shows Little Peter peering out of the mouth of a gaping fish (p. 48); perhaps it represents Uncle Lubin’s hope of finding his little nephew in the depths of the ocean with the help of his submarine. We can tell the child looking out of the fish’s mouth is little Peter, not a mer-boy, because it has clothes on, as the mer-boys never do, and because its hair is arranged with a curl on the forehead – a kiss-curl – whereas the mer-boys’ always stream upwards, like seaweed in water. The first picture of the mer-boy, on the title page of the Sixth Adventure, seems to confirm the link with Peter: it shows him with much shorter hair than in the drawings that follow, and with the distinctive kiss-curl (p. 55). On this title page Peter seems to be mutating into the mer-boy, a process that began in the marginal drawing of the child in the fish’s mouth, which shows Uncle Lubin’s nephew sporting an uncharacteristic smile. Before this, almost every picture of the baby shows him crying, and the smile suggests a new and impish delight at having escaped from adult control, a delight which gets transferred to the mer-boys in the following chapter, who smile and laugh in nearly every situation.[5]

The adventure with the baby mer-boy, then, seems to emerge organically from Uncle Lubin’s quest for his baby nephew, and from his desire to find Peter in the sea despite the fact that there is no evidence he was ever there apart from the marginal drawing (though the wicked bag-bird resembles a pelican, an ocean-going bird, which might have suggested the ocean episodes). Lubin clearly shares Peter’s and the mer-boy’s delight in the sea and its denizens, as the cover drawing for the Fifth Adventure, ‘The Sea Serpent’, shows the old man sitting astride a gaping fish with a grin even broader than his nephew’s (p. 45). One suspects that Lubin went to sea as much for his own gratification as for the quest; he certainly looks delighted with his submarine in every picture showing them together. He looks for his nephew, then, as waywardly as he once looked after him; which means that the supposed real-world distinction in responsibility between a child and its adult minder has little meaning in Heath Robinson’s universe. And the story told by the mer-boy confirms this impression. Unlike the highly moralistic teacher figures in Kingsley’s The Water Babies, the mer-boy’s elderly teacher is as interested in toys as any child could be – his lesson involves an explanation of why a spinning top hums as it spins (p. 62) – and his failure to take things seriously seems to be punished when a passing sea creature swallows him in the middle of the lesson. As he is swallowed the mer-boys laugh at him, and this in turn could be seen as being punished by the fate of the mer-boy in the marginal drawing on the same page, which shows him being pinched by a crab so that he cries, for once, instead of laughing (p. 62). But any moral we may have been intended to deduce from Heath Robinson’s words and images is implicitly contradicted by the last picture in the chapter, which shows Uncle Lubin falling into his submarine head first (p. 64), exactly mirroring the way the teacher fell into the fish’s mouth. If the mer-boy was being punished for his laughter when the crab pinched him, was Lubin being punished for telling the mer-boy it was ‘not nice’ to laugh when his teacher was swallowed (p. 62)? Morally speaking, Heath Robinson’s words and pictures offer their readers mixed messages, in which the usual hierarchy of childhood and adulthood – whereby the adult issues authoritative instruction while the child is expected to listen in passive obedience – no longer applies.

This is confirmed in the following adventure, where Uncle Lubin rewards the mer-boy ‘for telling him such nice stories’ (p. 66) (the contradiction is pointed up by the verbal echo of ‘not nice’) by telling him a story of his own. Lubin’s story concerns the time when he himself was ‘a little boy’, suggesting that the only thing that separates old men from little boys is time. And the old man’s tale has no more moral than the mer-boy’s did. Young Lubin is lost in the snow when he comes across the murderous old man wielding a battered sword, and the conclusion of the story has the little boy running away and finding his way home by sheer good luck so that he ‘was able to sleep in bed that night after all’ (p. 70). Young Lubin’s discovery of the route home has no causal link to his encounter with the murderous old man – it’s a matter of chance; and the old man’s murderous intentions certainly explode the myth that old age brings with it responsibility and accumulated wisdom. In addition, Uncle Lubin’s story is not much ‘nicer’ than the mer-boy’s. No one likes to think that one can come across bloodthirsty killers quite by accident while out for a walk, and some parents might be disturbed to find the fact advertised in a text devised for the nursery. In this way Heath Robinson’s work disrupts the function as well as the format of an illustrated picture book, implying that its author shares Uncle Lubin’s wholehearted dismissal of the usual understanding of the way search and rescue operations, and the adult world in general, is supposed to operate. Lubin’s search for little Peter is random, and ends with the random discovery of him; it is as much a search for himself as it is for his nephew, since he seldom seems to know where he is or why he is there. Like the swordsman Vammerdopper, who got blown onto an uninhabited island by a giant’s breath, he is a feather to each wind that blows, and so it seems is everyone else he comes across.

The absence of hierarchy in Heath Robinson’s book – from the refusal to prioritise either text or image to the close parallels between children and grown ups throughout the narrative – extends to the relationship between text and reader. The book is full of pictures of Uncle Lubin looking out of the page directly at the reader, inviting them to share his delight in extemporary invention, his total disregard for health and safety, and his enthusiastic indulgence in wild adventures. The child reader is the old man’s accomplice, and participates in his adventures by scanning each detailed, eccentric drawing as carefully as any parent might wish a child to scrutinise an instructive text. The close relationship is implied, in fact, by the old man’s quest, which is to find the child with whom he considers himself to have the closest bond; a charming concept, though even this is a little undercut by Peter’s evident distress whenever his uncle is holding him (a distress which would seem well-founded when he slips out of Lubin’s arms as the old man falls asleep [p. 5], so that the bag-bird could be seen as Peter’s rescuer rather than his abductor, since it never drops him).

Lubin’s kindness to everyone he meets could be seen as the moral point of the book, but even this is undercut: on meeting Vammadopper stranded on a rock Lubin never offers to rescue him, merely ‘kissing him kindly’ before sailing off on his quest (p. 38), and he is quite bad tempered with the mer-boy when the child clings to his submarine. There’s an anarchism to Lubin’s adventures, then, which allies them to Barrie’s representation of childhood in the Peter Pan books, or Alice’s adventures in the unstable world of adult humans and creatures in Carroll’s Wonderland, or Captain Nemo’s misanthropic wanderings in Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea. Resist the temptation, these books imply, to accept on trust the moral systems you are offered. Chart your own route through this rapidly-changing modern world and improvise your own practical responses to every eventuality. You may find and make friends and communities as you go, but be aware that these may not last. The wicked bag-bird waits in the wings – though given your distrust of moral systems it may not turn out to be so very wicked after all – and you will need to build wings and fins and sails and propellors of your own if you are to deal with it.

The most convincing reading of Heath Robinson’s book, I think, is ecological. Uncle Lubin finds a way to inhabit the many different landscapes he enters, making himself part of each ecosystem by constructing the various specialist adaptations he needs to negotiate their challenges. He does not bring a fixed perspective to each new context, but improvises his reactions to the dangers they pose, sometimes by behaving as the other inhabitants do, sometimes by inventing appropriate responses or behaviours: flying down from the moon with the help of his hat, in imitation of the wicked bag bird; leaving Vammadopper on the island to which he has been exiled in mute recognition that it’s where he belongs; trudging through the polar snow of the Land of Chilblains in his slippers, wearing his patched coat and carrying a candle to light up the polar night, as if he were wandering through his own house and garden (though his attempt to melt an iceberg with the candle [p. 41] is not so successful in its consequences [p. 43]); responding to the attempts of a sea-serpent and a dragon-snake to kill him by killing them instead, thanks to his intimate knowledge of their habits and tendencies (the sea-serpent can be killed by putting salt on its tail, while a dragon-snake is fatally susceptible to music). With the mer-boy Uncle Lubin becomes, in effect, both the mer-boy and his elderly teacher, while his dream of little Peter among the fairies populates fairyland with old men wearing funny hats, much like himself. His rescue of the rajah from the wasp leads him to be hugged and kissed by the monarch and his cheering people (pp. 104-5), while the final adventure sees Uncle Lubin become one with the bag-bird by finding and entering its nest. All the way through, Lubin presents himself not as an authority or an evangelist but as an interloper who wishes to embrace the circumstances in which he finds himself. Even the bag-bird seems always to consider him less as an enemy than an amusement, who causes it to laugh inordinately – up until the moment when he makes it cry. Lubin is endlessly resourceful and open-minded in his willingness to become part of the places and narratives in which he finds himself, and the objects he brings with him on his adventures seem equally adaptable. His quest for little Peter, in other words, is the very opposite of an imperialist conquest; it’s an opportunity for him to manifest his pleasure in new and unexpected places, people and animals, without violating the conditions under which they live. If the Adventures of Uncle Lubin is an epic, it’s not a nationalist manifesto, like the Aeneid, but something older, a creation myth for a manner of living in which nations and their armies have no purpose.

Early responses to Heath Robinson’s work suggest that his tendency to reject conventional hierarchical relations between text and image, or between people, creatures and places, could disturb his British readers. In his book for A. and C. Black’s Brush, Pen and Pencil series, W. Heath Robinson (1913, reprinted 1930), A. E. Johnson commented on Heath Robinson’s propensity for departing from the texts he illustrated and following his own imaginative trajectory: ‘Where the illustrator fails’, Johnson writes, ‘as usually happens, is in the difficult task of embodying the essential literary motive and idea. […] The defect is one which Heath Robinson shares with most illustrators, whose natural instinct is to concern themselves with the pictorial possibilities afforded by the author’s context, rather than the elucidation of his central (and purely literary) idea’ (pp. 14-15). He also rebukes Heath Robinson for not illustrating the plays of Shakespeare with an eye to their presentation on the stage (pp. 41-2) – something most illustrators have done with Shakespeare, and for good reason, since his most visually striking passages refer to events not taking place in front of the audience, such as Ophelia’s drowning, or Clarence’s dream, or Enobarbus’s account of Cleopatra in her barge. Heath Robinson, Johnson opines, is an artist who

never has been, and does not desire to be, an illustrator in the strict sense of the word. He demands to go his own way too much, unwilling to re-state literal facts pictorially, and providing rather an accompaniment to the author’s text than an exposition of his meaning. One may hazard a guess that the authors for whose writings he has made drawings […] have proved to him, as an artist, a nuisance and a bore. Their writings furnish excuses for his pictures, but, except as pegs upon which to hang the latter, he would much prefer not to be hampered by them. (pp. 18-19)

For Johnson, Uncle Lubin represents Heath Robinson’s solution to his impatience with other authors (pp. 47-50); in it, drawings can give rise to new ideas as readily as words can. In this way the book predicts the rapid rise of the ‘ninth art’ of comics in the twentieth century, where pictures and words are given more or less equal weighting. It also affirms the fantasy creator’s delight in enabling their impossible narrative to transfer itself from one medium to another, or to fuse media together – something that’s effectively built in to comics, with their frequent mimicry of cinema and their seeming readiness to be converted into cinematic terms, or of course into games.

Many of the great fantasy writers have either been writer-artists themselves or have happily worked with visual artists in a collaborative bid to extend their imaginative universe in new directions. Fantasy at its best is not afraid of its own tendency to be transformed as it enters different artistic, theatrical, ludic or musical modes of expression. Its authors are rarely unsettled by the idea that sympathetic adapters might come to think of them as ‘a nuisance and a bore’, or that their texts might become mere ‘pegs’ for more interesting work in another medium. What fills them with the infectious joy of Uncle Lubin is the idea of the infinite universe of imaginative adventure which these transformations confirm and enlarge. This is not a universe with a hierarchy; it’s an anarchic but beautifully patterned universe, whose centre is everywhere and whose circumference is nowhere. One of these centres is Heath Robinson’s little book The Adventures of Uncle Lubin. This book deserves the respect due to an imaginative crossroads or railway junction, from which paths or railroads are always being laid by our eyes and minds to take us in unexpected and often exhilarating new directions…

NOTES

[1] My edition of the book, from which all references are taken, The Adventures of Uncle Lubin, Told and Illustrated by W. Heath Robinson, published by the Minerva Press, London, in 1972.

[2] Heath Robinson had a great propensity for drawing impish or helpless birds. See e.g. his picture of ‘A simple apparatus for rescuing a wounded snipe’, or the picture of a tiny chick trying to hatch a set of ostrich eggs in ‘Thoughtfulness; or taking mother’s place’, or the picture of chicks nesting in an elderly man’s top hat in Bill the Minder. These can be found in A. E. Johnson, Heath Robinson (London: A. and C. Black, 1913, reprinted 1930), in the following places: between pp. 24 and 25, between pp. 16 and 17, and on p. 9.

[3] Objects are also present in the very first ornamental illustration, before even the frontispiece, which shows all the objects I’ve listed bar the slippers – hat, gun, sword, umbrella, accordion – along with a stick and a candle, as if to confirm the centrality of things to the adventures to come.

[4] In some versions of the book the merman is described as the mer-boys’ father, and is balancing an eel rather than a humming-top on his hand. I’d be interested to know more about why and how Heath Robinson ended up producing two versions of the same story, with illustrations to match…

[5] It’s tempting to see a link between the lost Peter, with his increasing taste for adventure, and J. M. Barrie’s more famous Peter, who ran away as a baby in Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens and made friends with the birds in Hyde Park. But Peter’s Kensington adventures were first told in chapters 13 to 18 of Barrie’s novel The Little White Bird, which was published in the same year as Heath Robinson’s (1902). Peter did not meet mermaids until he became the star of Barrie’s play, Peter Pan, in 1904. This makes a direct link between the texts unlikely.

Jo Heaton, Red Button: A Story for Christmas (c. 1984). Illustrations.

In about 1984, at the age of twenty-one or twenty-two, I had thoughts of trying my luck as an illustrator. Unfortunately I’d concentrated nearly all my efforts up to that point on black-and-white pictures, which meant I wouldn’t be much use for children’s books. This became obvious when my mother suggested I illustrate a book for children by one of her friends, the actor Jo Heaton. The book had a colour in its title, and featured characters who are often designated by their colours: red, blue, grey, brass, pearly-white and so on. All the same, I took on the project with enthusiasm, and worked on it for about a year while living with my brother in a one-bedroom apartment near St Pancras. I liked the story very much and was keen to try my luck on a large-scale project such as this one. In the end I produced thirty-six illustrations, and Jo and I went on to hawk the manuscript with its pictures around various publishing houses.

Needless to say, we were not successful. Apart from the basic absurdity of offering publishers a book about colour with black-and-white illustrations, I believe it was unorthodox to present the text with illustrations already attached, instead of leaving the publishers to select the most appropriate artist. I also think my pictures were a little stiff and stilted; a lighter touch would have improved them. The year after this, in 1985, I was asked to teach university classes on Renaissance and medieval romance, early modern prose and Shakespeare. I left St Pancras for Oxford, and the rest is (personal) history: I went on to become an academic, eventually working for thirty years at the University of Glasgow with little leisure to pursue my interest in drawing.

Jo’s book told the story of a young girl called Judy whose mother buys her a music box full of buttons at a charity shop run by a certain Mr Ball. The buttons, it turns out, have personalities, and the story tells how they get to know a new arrival after their journey to Judy’s house. Each button has an interesting back story, but the new button – who is large and red – prefers to remain mysterious about his origins; all they know is that he fell out of an empty sky onto Mr Ball’s head, and that he seems to have travelled further than anyone possibly could have done and to have been existence for about 2000 years. Of course it turns out that this button belongs to a large and rather care-worn person with a red suit and a large white beard, who has been looking for him from the moment he was missed. Red Button recovers his back story on Christmas Eve, and everything turns out exactly as it should in the end, for the girl, for the shopkeeper Mr Ball, and for all the other buttons we have got to know in the course of the narrative. The tale is full of inventive dialogue, and the various buttons and their adventures gave me the chance to picture a rich range of situations, as many as one might find in a book of short stories.

My pictures drew on the work of some of my favourite illustrators. Most prominent among them was Maurice Sendak, who I met around this time at a book signing and who told me with reference to publishers (after I told him I was trying to make it as an illustrator): ‘don’t forget, they need us more than we need them’. That’s advice with a wide application, and I haven’t forgotten it. Sendak drew wonderful Christmas pictures, especially his haunting designs for the Nutcracker ballet, which were incorporated into a picture book – the very one I asked him to sign. Another huge influence was Pauline Baynes, especially those wonderful pictures in the Narnia books and the Oxford Book of Nursery Rhymes where she weaves together several images into a kind of cartoon strip, surrounded by a border constructed out of appropriate objects – plants, perhaps, or chains, or river currents. Some of the crosshatching techniques recall another of my heroes, Tove Jansson, especially her comics, which my Dad read to us as children, translating from Swedish as he went along. Now I think of it, Jansson too did fascinating things with the frames of her comics, and I may have been more influenced by her than by Baynes in this respect.Other artists I loved included Gerard Hoffnung, especially his illustrations for Colette’s L’Enfant et les Sortilèges (the animated furniture in that book is everywhere in my drawings) and early Disney movies, especially Pinocchio and the musical automata in Geppetto’s workshop. Mimicking these artists was an education in itself for an aspiring book designer.

Jansson plays with frames in her Moomin comics
Hoffnung’s animated furniture

Here, then, as a Christmas offering, are some of the pictures I made for Jo Heaton’s story. I offer them in memory of her, and in want of anything more suitable to put up on this blog for Christmas.

[Nb: click on each picture for a closer view.]

Chapter One, Capital
‘You could walk into Mr Ball’s shop and find him busy with his feather duster’
‘The first thing Mr Ball did […] was take a giant red button out of his coat pocket and stare at it.’
‘There was a musical box displayed in the shop window.’
‘Switch that light off!’
Big Brass
Star and Square
Grey
How Grey got broken
Flower, Burglar, Big Brass and Shoe
‘Pearl looks like the moon reflecting the sun!’
Red’s adventures
Stripey
‘”As a matter of fact,” said Mr Ball, “That’s very suitable as a Christmas present. Let me show you why.”‘
Mr Ball finds Red and Burglar
Burglar
‘”We’ve been s… sold,” said Flower, and burst into tears.’
‘It was a terrible journey for the buttons.’
‘One by one Judy inspected the buttons.’
‘It was then that Grey decided to escape.’
‘The buttons gazed round the large room.’
‘At the very top of the tree Star dangled from the neck of an angel.’
The family choose their buttons
‘Have you ever felt as happy as you do tonight?’
‘”I remember a night long ago when my oyster opened his shell.”‘
‘A large man […] groped his way out of the fireplace.’
‘”Thank goodness I found you, Red!”‘
‘He looked just like a tiny, glittering moon.’
‘Judy peeped round the door.’
‘”Nobody would buy a Christmas card of you looking like that!”‘
‘He went straight to the drinks cabinet and took several gulps straight from the brandy bottle.’
‘Pearl imagined Red speeding away over the rooftops.’
‘They all saw the clothes they were going to be sewn onto dancing in their dreams.’
‘Mr Ball had a Christmas present to give to every homeless person in the town.’

Fantasy 1939: Patricia Lynch, The Grey Goose of Kilnevin

[This post continues a discussion that began in my February post, Fantasy 1939: Patricia Lynch, The Turf-Cutter’s Donkey Kicks Up His Heels, which you can find here. However, it can also be read independently, I hope!]

Dustjacket of first edition, by the Irish painter John Keating.

In Patricia Lynch’s The Turf-Cutter’s Donkey Kicks Up His Heels (1939) relatives are always going missing. The child protagonists, for example, disappear into the past, get turned into eagles or find themselves trapped in magic mushrooms, to the understandable consternation of the family members they leave behind. But Eileen and Seamus at least have a family, which lends their disappearances a kind of holiday air, since they are safely tethered to the small but comfortable bog-side cottage they share with their parents, the home to which they always return no matter how far their travels take them in space and time. One of their earlier books of adventures, The Turf-Cutter’s Donkey Goes Visiting (1935), is even cast as a vacation on a nearby island, ending in a homecoming to the family cabin they left a few days earlier. The Turf-Cutter’s Donkey Kicks Up His Heels focuses on moments between episodes of work, of which a holiday is an extended example: trips to town to buy seeds for the garden, trips to the agricultural show to display the children’s flowers and vegetables, a trip to the circus, the family festival of Christmas Eve and Christmas Day. It is also full of accidental digressions from labour, such as the trip through time to a Danish invasion of Ireland which takes place when Seamus drives the family’s donkey-cart along the wrong road on an errand from his father, or the trip that ends in imprisonment in the magic mushroom, which takes place when Eileen gets distracted from her work of picking nuts for the family larder. Useful work and family life frame each adventure, lending it a stability and security it would not otherwise possess.

The other novel Lynch published in 1939 – The Grey Goose of Kilnevin – contains similar ingredients, including people who go missing, digressions from work, and even a circular narrative structure, taking the child protagonist away from and back to the house from which she set out at the beginning of her adventures; but it has a very different atmosphere, largely thanks to the different circumstances of that child protagonist. Sheila lives in the House of the Four Swans with an unpleasant woman called Fat Maggie, who treats her like a slave and sends her on an errand from which she hopes the little girl will never return. If Sheila does come back, she expects to be in trouble with Fat Maggie for one reason or another, since every errand she is sent on ends in a telling-off. At the same time, all her adventures are haunted by the idea of a loving family home of the kind enjoyed by the child protagonists of the turf-cutter’s donkey series, Eileen and Seamus. Sheila has made a small corner of Fat Maggie’s house her own – a ‘tiny cubby-hole under the stairs’ where she has her bed, and in which she keeps her precious story books and two or three other treasured possessions.[1] This is her home, in her imagination, and it’s this small corner of the house that endures to the end of the narrative, making it something like the miniature damaged Noah’s Ark which is her only toy, adrift in a flood of mysterious happenings but offering stability and a lifeline to those who desperately need them.

Puffin edition.

Sheila’s story is immersed in strangeness like a land immersed in mist, or an ark immersed in the heaving waters of the flood. Indeed, mist and other difficult weather conditions – rain, snow, darkness and another flood – pervade the text, hiding the land from the child who is travelling through it on her seemingly endless errand for Fat Maggie. The mist stands in, perhaps, for the obscurity of the past; Sheila has no memory of her parents or origins, while one of the fellow travellers she meets, the Ballad Singer, has forgotten who he is altogether, which means he is never named. Another fellow traveller is only ever known as the apple woman, and though her name is mentioned once – Mary Anne (p. 121) – we never find out where she is from or whether she has a family, unlike the apple woman in The Turf-Cutter’s Donkey Kicks Up His Heels, who has a good sense of her own origins. A third is a boy named Fergus, who once travelled with the tinkers (pp. 255-6) but knows nothing more about himself, it seems. Even the two named children, Sheila and Fergus, do not have surnames to attach them to relatives or places; only the grey goose of the title knows who she is and where she came from. The four human travellers wander through a landscape bereft of names or distinguishing features apart from fallen trees and the occasional body of water, along roads which seem to be constantly changing direction, through towns that don’t exist on any map. The Ireland of The Grey Goose of Kilnevin has lost itself, and Sheila’s unwritten task is to help it find its way to a new identity.

In this quest for coordinates, and hence for a history and a satisfactory way of living, Sheila is assisted by her love of stories: the story books she keeps in her cubby hole, the stories she tells herself to earn food and shelter on her travels. The reader will recognise some of these, as they have echoes in the story we’re reading, helping us to map its incidents onto templates provided by our memories and so to accept them despite their strangeness. Fat Maggie’s desire to be rid of Sheila, which prompts her to send her on what seems an impossible errand, echoes the hostility of the stepmother in Hansel and Gretel, who is always trying to lose the children in the forest. When Sheila first meets the young grey goose of the title, who is barely more than a fledgling, she keeps calling her a duck, which echoes Hans Christian Andersen’s famous fable ‘The Ugly Duckling’ – though the duckling grew up to be a swan, of course, and the grey goose never does. Later, Sheila compares the goose to the bird that laid the golden eggs in the tale of Mother Goose, because of her uncanny ability to lay eggs to order (p. 18, pp. 46-49).[2] When Sheila tastes a few drops of golden water and finds she can understand what the goose is saying, Irish readers will be reminded of the story of the salmon of knowledge, which was caught by Finegas and given to the boy Fionn to cook on a fire. Fionn burned his thumb on a drop of the fish’s fat, sucked it, and thereby acquired all the knowledge that had once been stored in the salmon’s flesh, just as Sheila acquires knowledge of the language of birds and beasts by tasting the liquid she was sent to purchase by her abusive employer. Towards the end of her adventures Sheila meets four children who have been transformed by magic into swans by another hostile stepmother, and Irish readers will remember the Children of Lir, who were cursed to live as swans for many decades, wandering up and down the island of Ireland till released from their curse by a friendly saint. They may also remember an alternative version of the story told by Yeats in his Fairy and Folk Tales of the Irish Peasantry (1888), in which the four swans are replaced by twelve wild geese, who must be liberated from their enchantment by their courageous sister. The little grey farmyard goose who is Sheila’s closest companion is always hearkening after its relatives in the wild, tempted to join them on their travels despite the weakness of her wings; Irish readers will know that ‘wild geese’ is also a term for emigrants who left Ireland to serve as soldiers in other countries, and who could therefore stand in for the wider Irish diaspora. Many of these stories deal with one or more people who lose their homes and must go through many adventures before they find a place for themselves, if they ever do. The very fact of being one among many wanderers helps to give Sheila the sense that she is part of a wider community; and this sense is reinforced by the way the little group of travellers she teams up with – the grey goose, Fergus, the Ballad Singer, the apple woman – gradually become her found family, as they help each other survive through their special skills and mutual affection.

The old Ballad Singer, by John Keating

The magical world encountered by Sheila, however, differs from the world of myth and fairy tale in the sheer ordinariness of the magical things and episodes it contains. The golden water tasted by Sheila, for instance – the water that gives her the power to understand the speech of birds and animals – is taken from an ordinary rock pool in Kilnevin harbour. The ugly duckling in this story turns out to be a small fat goose, not a regal swan. The goose in question, Betsy, lays eggs to order, but these are not golden eggs; just ordinary goose eggs, which furnish Sheila and her friends with the best of suppers (pp. 46-8). The flock of wild geese which Betsy the goose and the old Ballad Singer choose to follow are simply that – a flock of wild geese, not altered children – though miracles accumulate around them, as when they carry Sheila to safety across a bridge of mist (p. 56), or help Fergus fly to Sheila when he has lost track of her whereabouts (p. 242). The residence vaguely remembered by the old Ballad Singer as his first home, and the place he is looking for throughout the story, sounds palatial – ‘a mansion wid silver walls an gleamin roof’, as he tells Sheila (p. 37) – but turns out to be the ordinary house from which Sheila set out at the start of the novel, though transfigured by a humble act of magic into ‘a fine square house with freshly whitened walls and a grand tiled roof, gleaming and sparkling’ in the morning sun (p. 283). Each of these ordinary objects and creatures drifts easily in and out of a state of enchantment. At times Sheila can even bring about these gentle transitions from the ordinary to the magical and back again through the sheer force of her imagination, as when she gets frightened by a talking scarecrow and makes believe with all her might that it can no longer talk or move – something that duly happens a few sentences later (‘The scarecrow stood still and silent without ever answering a word’, p. 70). In this she exhibits the power of the storyteller, whose work, as Lynch conceives it, is to demonstrate the wonderful strangeness of the everyday, rather than to lose itself in the more nebulous wonders of the weird, the other-worldly or the ideal.

It’s worth quoting Lynch on the storyteller’s work to get a grip on what she’s reaching for in her fantastic writing:

Critics have said that they find in my writing a blend of ordinary life and of fantasy. I appreciate the compliment, for usually it is meant that way. But I have always considered that ordinary life – all life – is a fantasy, though it is certainly reality as well. What can be more fantastic than those bonds of friendship and affection that spring up out of nowhere and bind people together? What is more fantastic than our world of sea and sky, of red sunsets and golden moons. Yet if among the waving white bog cotton (canavaun), I spy just one little leprechaun, people who accepted all the other wonders as ‘ordinary’, think that this is most fantastic. It is time we saw life as a whole and realized its magic. What I have tried to do in my books is to reveal the magic of ordinary life.[3]

To this end, Lynch has her child protagonist reject the chance of a life beyond the bounds of ‘ordinary life’ on several occasions. When Sheila completes her errand for Fat Maggie, for instance – collecting three pounds of butter from a magical woman called Bridgie Swallow, who can change at will into the bird whose name she bears – she is offered the chance to stay with Bridgie for ever in a kind of fairy land, where she can visit a fairytale castle whenever she wants to, and perhaps make permanent friends of the princely Children of Lir. But Sheila quickly comes to the conclusion that she’d rather go back to her found family, the Ballad-Singer, the apple woman and Fergus the sulky boy, than inhabit this unchangingly perfect environment. Again, when she helps the Children of Lir they offer to reward her by granting her a wish, and she chooses to be made as beautiful as they are, transformed in her own eyes from an ugly goose to a lovely human swan. But when Fergus sees her in her new form he at first does not recognize her, then expresses disgust at her appearance: ‘You’re not the Sheila I know,’ he tells her, ‘You look like a doll[!]’ (p. 244). He goes on to explain his disgust in detail:

Look at the colour of your hair! It’s like straw! Look at your eyes! They’re like bits of blue glass! Look at your mouth! It’s like a squashed strawberry! You used to have brown hair and brown eyes and a mouth that looked like a mouth. You used to be a proper girl! (p. 245)

So when Betsy the goose agrees with Fergus (she likes Sheila best in the ordinary form she took when Betsy first met her, ‘when I was tired and harashed an parched wid the drought, an ye were very good to me’, p. 245), Sheila decides to go back to her old appearance, discarding her metaphorical swan-form and remaining a ‘proper girl’ for the rest of the novel. In the process she revises the ending of Andersen’s story of the ugly duckling, choosing to retain her ‘ugly’ ordinariness because that’s what people associate with her best qualities: freely-given affection, hard work for the good of all, and generosity to strangers, whether beast or human.

Fergus, by John Keating

In fact, revisions of Andersen’s story occur on several occasions in the novel. First, as we’ve seen, Sheila mistakes the grey goose Betsy for a duck when she first meets her, and is perfectly happy when she finds she’s a little fat goose instead of a swan. Later Sheila tries to tell the story of the Ugly Duckling in return for food and lodging at an inn run by a hostile woman who recalls Fat Maggie; but she cannot finish the story because the woman keeps ‘glaring’ at her, and the narrative peters out without achieving its happy ending (p. 80). Finally, on returning to her starting point – the House of the Four Swans – she finds that the building has burned down, leaving intact only her cubby-hole under the stairs and most of the kitchen. Shortly afterwards, however, the house is miraculously restored to its intact state, and at this point it is renamed ‘the House of the Grey Goose’, with a sign carved by the boy Fergus, who has displayed his talent for carving many times since Sheila met him (p. 285). The old Ballad Singer celebrates its restoration by announcing a ceilidh, which at once marks the house as a gathering-place for the local community, like the house of Mrs Rafferty in Lynch’s realist novel Fiddler’s Quest (1941). At this point the regal swan of Andersen’s story – Lynch’s Four Swans – has been transformed into an ordinary goose, without royal associations but with rich folkloric properties of its own. Meanwhile the story of the Ugly Duckling has acquired a different moral (and as the Ballad-Singer affirms, ‘No story is complete widout a moral’, p. 49). Instead of the protagonist being revealed as a member of the privileged elite, with their graceful curving necks and dazzling whiteness – as it is in Andersen – a community of ordinary geese (Sheila and her friends) finds a permanent habitation, a home to which other ordinary creatures are drawn by their instinctive liking for its kindly residents. Everyone is welcome at the House of the Grey Goose, and the creativity it fosters – the old Ballad-Singer’s singing, Fergus’s carving, Sheila’s talent for telling stories – is freely shared with those who choose to come inside.

An unsettling scarecrow, by John Keating

The world, of course, had great need for such a community in 1939. Ireland as Lynch depicts it in The Grey Goose of Kilnevin is a place lost in the mist, unclear as to the relationship between past and present, uncertain how to address itself to strangers, or indeed to its own citizens. Kilnevin, the town of the title, is a bustling, cheerful place; but when Sheila and the grey goose set out from there on their travels they find themselves wandering through eerie nameless zones without a geographical or moral compass. On first leaving Kilnevin, Sheila and her companions – at this stage the grey goose, the Ballad Singer and Fergus (they meet the apple woman much later) – soon lose their way, crossing an insubstantial bridge of mist which leads to a foggy mountainside where a misplaced scarecrow stands; misplaced because it isn’t protecting any crops and because it’s unable to scare away crows. The scarecrow is surrounded by jeering birds on its rock-strewn island in the mist, like a bedraggled St Brendan on the Island of Birds (‘There were rooks and magpies, hedge sparrows and wrens, swallows and starlings’, p. 58); but although the birds show no fear of its stick arms and rusty gun, Sheila quickly learns to distrust the scarecrow’s intentions, noting that ‘The longer she looked at [it] the less [she] liked it’ (p. 62). The scarecrow is joined at nightfall by a host of rabbits – ‘too many’, as Fergus darkly observes (p. 63) – and starts to behave like a despot, first demanding that Sheila give it the goose to keep as a pet, then separating her from her companions and plunging her in darkness; no wonder Betsy describes it as a ‘fearsome creature’ (p. 69). Later, though, Sheila seems to think of it more as a wonder than a monster; and it bequeaths to the Ballad Singer – who himself resembles a scarecrow – its neat green coat, which he exchanges for the ragged coat he was wearing when Sheila first meets him. A green coat has powerful resonances, of course, for the Irish, and by passing on this symbolic garment to Sheila’s travelling companion the scarecrow could be said to pass on to him and his party the task of representing Ireland in the gloomy final year of the 1930s. The scarecrow, in other words, could be read as a dilapidated Ireland of the present – or perhaps the recent past – and Sheila and her friends as an Ireland of the future, seeking out some corner of the country in which to put down roots for a better and more fruitful existence.[4]

Along the way, Sheila and her companions pass through several communities which are actively hostile to travellers like themselves. In one town, the female innkeeper begrudges Sheila, Fergus and the Ballad-Singer the most basic of shelters in a howling storm, and later tries to steal the little grey goose from Sheila to cook for supper, thereby aligning herself with the cannibalistic witch in Hansel and Gretel. In another town Sheila finds that she is wholly invisible to the occupants, who spend their time quarrelling and buying unpleasant goods such as cough lozenges, carbolic soap and boot polish under the watchful eye of an oversized policeman, who enjoys ‘swinging his baton and glaring about him’ in a threatening manner (p. 200).[5] This is a ‘neat, tidy, cleaned-up town’ which defines itself in hostile opposition to what lies beyond its borders: the encroaching forest, the winter snow, and homeless wanderers of every description. Both towns have all the ingredients for pleasant living – in the first, a hostelry that advertises ‘FOOD AND LODGING / FOR MAN AND BASTE’ (p. 74) and resounds with song; in the second, fine shops, a market place, pavements and neat garden paths (p. 196) – but both choose to fill every available space with selfish people, nasty lyrics, squabbles and fights, unnecessary artefacts and harsh regulations (as embodied by the policeman). It’s as if Kilnevin had been warped by the likes of Fat Maggie into a dystopia from which the poor, the old and the orphaned young have been excluded, left to endure the vagaries of the weather with only ruins to protect them.[6] In the middle chapters of the novel, in fact, Sheila and her companions take shelter in a ruined cottage, and contrive with their creativity and friendly conversation to transform it into yet another version of the ideal home, echoing Sheila’s bedroom under the stairs at the start of the book and the utopian House of the Grey Goose in the final chapter. This version of that home is only temporary, however, and the companions are forced to flee through the roof when they get snowed in. The ideal Ireland is always potentially present in Lynch’s novel, but only comes into being in the final pages, when Sheila and her traveller friends find a permanent home in its only named community, the seaside town of Kilnevin.

The Big Garda, by John Keating

To understand what has happened to Ireland in this book, it will help to turn to the final novel in the Turf Cutter’s Donkey sequence, Long Ears (1943). In this book Lynch recounts the titular donkey’s adventures from birth to the day he meets his future friends, the turf-cutter’s children Eileen and Seamus, who are his inseparable companions in the other three books of the series. The farm where Long Ears is born is a happy place, where animals of different species live in harmony, a little girl acts out fairy tales with her dolls, and the adults are ‘dacent people’ who say ‘Never a harsh word from dawn till dark’.[7] But young Long Ears is lured away from the farm by a wily cat, and soon finds himself on a long, hard, weary road – first with a community of tinkers, some of whom treat him harshly, and afterwards with other wanderers on a mysterious ‘Road of Dreams’ – the same road to which he returns with Eileen and Seamus in later life – populated with lost souls from the distant past and the unhappy present. On this road he meets a red-haired dwarf from Irish legend, Fer Fi, who plays tunes on a magic harp which can make its hearers weep, sleep, or laugh. The dwarf informs the donkey that all his troubles arise from the fact that he has strayed onto the ‘wrong side of the mountain’ – presumably at the precise moment when he wandered away from the farm where he lived with his mother. ‘We all spend our lives climbing,’ explains Fer Fi, but ‘If we’re foolish, we take the wrong path’ (pp. 213-4), finding ourselves in the barren, troublesome place through which Long Ears has travelled ever since. On this ‘wrong side of the mountain’ the young donkey meets sad rabbits, haughty sheep, and a stag who fell asleep in a magic cave at a time when Ireland was covered with forest, and woke to find itself in an Ireland covered instead with bustling towns ‘full of dogs and fear’ (p. 207). The stag leads Long Ears to one of these towns, which is just as strange and forbidding as the nameless towns in the Goose of Kilnevin. Surrounded by a high wall, its streets are empty and neglected, its inhabitants fast asleep, and its streets plastered with posters bearing a sinister message:

NO BALLAD SINGERS ALLOWED.
NO STORY TELLING PERMITTED.
CIRCUSES KEEP AWAY. DANCING PROHIBITED.
NO FAIRS HELD IN THIS TOWN UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE. (p. 209)

Soon afterwards Fer Fi suggests that the sentiment on these posters led directly to the town’s decay. ‘It all began,’ he tells Long Ears,

when they shut out the ballad singers and the story tellers. Then they built a wall to keep out the musicianers and the apple women, the balloon men, the toy sellers. When a circus came along they shut the gate and then they stopped the fairs! […] They were trying to be grand and proud. They wanted every one to be like themselves – working in shops and offices and living in the town. Soon their shops were empty and their kitchens, too. The children had no toys and all of them were cross and hungry. (pp. 212-3)

When Fer Fi was shut out, too – banned as a ‘musicianer’ because of his ‘three-stringed harp’ – he avenged himself by playing the ‘tune of sleep’ and setting the whole town dreaming, like a dismal version of the Sleeping Beauty’s castle. They can only awaken into happiness and prosperity when they learn to welcome travellers again, among them the ballad singers, storytellers, toy makers and apple women embodied by Sheila and her friends in the Goose of Kilnevin. Ireland, it’s implied, must embrace the whole of its culture if it’s to retain its vitality; its travelling folk must be welcomed into its settled communities, its traditional arts must be celebrated and nurtured, and the drab uniformity of the capitalist marketplace must be kept at bay. For Lynch, the Road of Dreams that leads to the ‘wrong side of the mountain’ is the road or dream of capitalism, from which the land must be urgently woken if it’s to free itself from the sterility of the nameless towns depicted in both novels. As a storyteller herself, her task is to alert her Irish readers to this necessity by luring them onto a different Road of Dreams: the road that teaches its travellers to make the most of what Lynch calls ‘ordinary life’, and to respect the mythical past that underpins every aspect of the Irish present.

The Apple Woman, by John Keating

‘Ordinary life’, for Lynch, refers to the lives of ordinary working people: not the ruling or middle classes, nor the church authorities, but the kinds of economically disadvantaged folk her stories focus on to the exclusion of all others: the folk who expend their creative energies in building happy communities, from cheerful families and towns to knots of mutually supportive travelling companions. Sheila and her friends are particularly adept in this art of community-building, setting up house in caves or clearings or ruined cottages as happily as in a well-appointed house, and inviting all comers to share their space. Excluding such friendly home-builders from its civic streets and houses – consigning them to the mercies of the wilderness or the windswept country roads – ensures that Ireland as a whole exists in a dreary nothing state, a nameless wasteland where the ‘bonds of friendship and affection’, as Lynch calls them in her essay, are devalued as merely ‘fantastic’.

Where Long Ears identifies that dreary condition as the ‘wrong side of the mountain’, in The Grey Goose of Kilnevin it’s the wrong road; and roads, it seems, are difficult things to navigate or assess. All the problems encountered by Sheila and her friends arise from ‘straying from the road’, or so Fergus believes, and the boy spends much of his time searching for a ‘proper road’ for them to take in place of the wrong one (p. 99); but roads are so many and various that a ‘proper road’ seems hard to identify. The companions find themselves travelling along many strange paths in the course of their wanderings: from a fox’s road, which is marked by certain distinctive trees in a trackless forest, to the path of the wild geese across the stormy sky, or the invisible road across the floodwaters which Sheila must follow to recover the swan-feather cloaks of the Children of Lir. Even when they find themselves on an indisputably ‘proper’ road – a racecourse or a railway – the travellers inevitably use it in the wrong way, straying across the racecourse in the middle of a race, for instance, to the rage of the massed spectators, or boarding a train without a valid ticket, to the outrage of the ticket collector. At one point Sheila comes across a fork in the road marked by a mysterious signpost whose arms point in two directions – up and down – exhorting passers-by to ‘dig’ or ‘fly’ (p. 90). Neither of these options seems the ‘proper’ one to Sheila (who insists ‘I can’t fly and I won’t dig’), but later both she and Fergus find themselves digging a path through snow to escape from the ruined cabin (pp. 163-4), then flying with the wild geese through the sky, seated on the apple woman’s ‘good shawl’ (p. 264), on the way back to the House of the Four Swans. By the time Sheila finds Bridgie Swallow – the woman whose butter she was sent to fetch – she has no idea which road she was meant to have taken, or indeed whether there is any ‘proper’ road at all for her to take:

‘Are you lost?’ [Bridgie] asked in a tiny voice.
‘I’ve been lost a long time,’ sighed Sheila. ‘But if I could only find the road now I wouldn’t say a word.’
‘Which road are you looking for?’ asked the little woman.
But that was just what Sheila couldn’t tell her. (p. 223)

Ireland’s roads have become a bewildering maze for the little girl, largely because she has become defined as a homeless traveller, an outcast from the capitalist economy that governs the country’s settled communities. She is not an animal like the fox, or a bird like the wild geese, but she is not seen as wholly human either, and so has no direction, no recognizable coordinates in the land of her birth.

Sheila, by John Keating

But Sheila’s outcast status, it emerges, is another fantasy; a potentially deadly fantasy imposed on her by those who seek to commandeer her rightful inheritance. Her conversation with Bridgie takes place in another variation on the ideal home: the ‘green cave of tree-trunks and bushes’ where Bridgie lives, its greenness marking it out as a version of Ireland. But though Bridgie invites the little girl to share the cave with her, Sheila knows it isn’t the place where she should pass the rest of her days. She tells herself she should live instead with her newfound family, Fergus, the Ballad Singer and the apple woman, and Bridgie later tells her exactly where: ‘[T]he House of the Four Swans is yours’, she explains (p. 231), which is why Fat Maggie wants rid of her, since with Sheila gone she can claim the property as her own. Sheila’s ‘proper’ road, in other words – the road that is her own, which is what ‘proper’ means, at least in French – is the road that leads to the House of the Four Swans, her proper home as well as the place where she was mistreated by Fat Maggie. After getting this important information Sheila quickly meets up again with Fergus and the others; but first Bridgie Swallow gives her some clothes, having noticed that the child’s own clothes have been worn to pieces by her travels. Sheila’s new clothes are green, the same colour as the coat given to the Ballad Singer by the scarecrow (p. 248); and in putting them on she identifies herself as an embodiment of Ireland, seeking the home that has always been hers despite its rejection of her.[8]

The stage is set for Sheila’s return to claim her birthright from Fat Maggie, a final act that also establishes her travelling companions as both her real and adoptive family, encouraging Irish readers to do the same with any outcasts or strangers they meet on the Irish roads. The road home turns out to be as eccentric as the roads away from home – flying with the geese on the apple woman’s shawl, as if on a magic carpet, or tumbling down a mountainside into the middle of the Kilnevin marketplace. But the bond of friendship between the companions ensures that they finally succeed in achieving a happy ending, despite the maze of eccentric routes they have followed on their adventures. Their familial relationship is first acknowledged by the people of Kilnevin when they recognise the old Ballad Singer as Sheila’s grandfather, the man who forgot his identity long ago and left his home in the House of the Four Swans to wander the roads, abandoning his grandchild to the untender mercies of Fat Maggie. By extension, the people of Kilnevin also assume that the apple woman is Sheila’s aunt and Fergus her cousin (p. 278), refusing to listen when the boy denies his kinship with any of them. When the travellers reach the gate of the House of the Four Swans, Sheila’s three human companions reluctantly set off on their wanderings again, assuming that the little girl has finally reached the place where she belongs and that there will be no room in it for vagrants like themselves. But an attack on Sheila by Fat Maggie brings them hurrying to her rescue, and at this point it becomes clear that all their roads lead in the same direction. Sheila insists that the House of the Four Swans ‘is your home as well as mine’ and that ‘I’d never be happy without you’ (p. 278); and so the familial relationship between them is finally confirmed. At this point the reader might notice that there are four human travellers in this little party, corresponding to the four swans of the Irish myth, and that like the birds they have just made the transition from a quasi-animal state to full humanity. Friendship has worked its magic on them, and it’s also the magic of friendship, it seems, that restores the House of the Four Swans to its pristine splendour after a fire has burned it down, shaking the ‘burnt-out ruin’ like an earthquake and refashioning it into the mansion remembered by the Ballad Singer in his visionary moments.

Betsy’s eggs, by John Keating

The restoration takes place after Sheila has returned from another shopping expedition, this time to fetch food and other necessities to make the ruins of the House of the Four Swans habitable again. Throughout this second shopping trip the little girl is repeatedly reminded of her earlier errand for Fat Maggie. Before Sheila sets out, the apple woman checks to make sure she will not ‘be goin off on adventures the way ye did when Maggie Fagan sent ye’ (p. 281); and a bookstall owner in the Kilnevin marketplace gives her a similar warning: ‘Sure, ye don’t want to go down in history as the girl that took till Tibb’s Eve to do a message’ (p. 283). This time, however, Sheila manages to avoid the unmoored wanderings that followed her first shopping expedition, and hurries home secure in the knowledge that she is now indistinguishable from the other children at the fair, since ‘I’ve a grandfather, and next door to an aunt and a brother, as well as a pet goose’ (p. 282). As she enters the ruined building where her found family awaits her she tells herself, ‘It’s really home now’ (p. 284, my emphasis); and it’s at this point, when she recognises the ruined House as ‘really’ her home – made so by the loving community assembled there – that the building miraculously reconstitutes itself: ‘The air was filled with flying sawdust. The walls were shaking. The door leading into the passage swung open, then slammed’, and moments later

The sun was shining, not on a burnt-out ruin, but on a fine square house with freshly whitened walls and a grand tiled roof, gleaming and sparkling. The windows were open to let in the morning air and the green paint on the doors was fresh and gay. (p. 285)

Echoing Sheila, the old Ballad Singer exclaims ‘Isn’t it well to be home at last’, and the usually sceptical Fergus confirms the secular miracle by means of a close examination of the structure: ‘Fergus rubbed the walls with his hand. He poked the doors with his fingers and felt the glass in the windows’ (p. 285). The greenness of the doors, like the greenness of Sheila’s new clothes and the greenness of the old Ballad Singer’s coat, confirms this as a specifically Irish house and an Irish miracle, and assures Lynch’s Irish readers that such a transformation could be worked on their own battered country, given the right conditions and the right collective attitude on the part of its citizens.

The restoration of the House is fantastic, of course, since the speed and ease with which it’s accomplished are impossible; but it’s no more fantastic, Lynch would claim, than the ‘bonds of friendship and affection that spring up out of nowhere and bind people together’. Those bonds may be a fantasy, in that they have no material existence, but Lynch insists that they are ‘certainly a reality as well’; and her book is designed to make that fantasy real, that is, to make it seen, so that it’s no longer invisible as Sheila was in the ‘neat, tidy, cleaned-up town’ overseen by the menacing policeman. The moment when the House of the Four Swans becomes ‘really home’ is the moment the fantasy of friendship and affection makes its realness felt, even as its effects seem most fantastic. The open doors and light-giving windows it fashions are solid ones, no matter how impossible the means by which they were ushered into existence.

My copy of A Storyteller’s Childhood, bound in green and gold

In my account of the final chapter I haven’t paid much attention to the ‘pet goose’ which accompanies Sheila throughout her travels. This seems particularly neglectful given that the little fat bird lends her name to Lynch’s novel, much as the legendary Mother Goose lends her name to many collections of fairy tales and nursery rhymes. As we’ve seen, The Grey Goose of Kilnevin is a kind of story collection as well as a novel, much like the story-books Sheila carries with her on her adventures: it’s packed with fairy tales, myths and legends, many of them containing geese, and it has a fairy-tale ending, too, though a modest one involving a house instead of a palace or castle. When the bookstall owner gives Sheila a story-book she has always coveted – a story-book bound in green and gold – she might almost be giving her a copy of Lynch’s novel, or something like it. My own copy is bound in grey, to match the colour of the grey goose Betsy, but many of her other books were published by Dent in green bindings with gold lettering stamped on the spine (my own copy of her quasi-autobiographical A Storyteller’s Childhood [1947] is bound in this way), no doubt to underline their Irish content. As well as a book, however, The Grey Goose of Kilnevin refers to a house, the hostelry run by Sheila and her friends, to which the people of Kilnevin are invited for a ceilidh in the final chapter. The title, then, brings together a loving and quasi-magical little person (Betsy the goose), a fantastic story-book and an enchanted hostelry or inn, which offers food and lodgings for everyone who walks through its door, homeless or propertied, human or nonhuman, old or young. It combines, then, every major concern of Lynch’s socialist vision – kind human beings, imaginative writing, wholesome habitations – and so stands as a working model of good living in the dark days leading up to the outbreak of the Second World War. It can serve as a working model for us, too, I think, guaranteed to make our own dark days a little brighter.

First edition of the Puffin version. I don’t know who did this wonderful cover.

NOTES

[1] Patricia Lynch, The Grey Goose of Kilnevin (London: J. M. Dent and Sons, 1939), p. 39. All references are to this edition. It should be mentioned that the most widely available version of this novel, first published as a Puffin Book in 1951 and reprinted by other publishers since, has been cut to fit the standard length of early Puffin paperbacks, and so leaves out some of Sheila’s adventures. These include (I think) her meeting with a talking scarecrow and her visit to the ‘neat, tidy, cleaned-up town’ ruled over by a large policeman.

[2] It seems likely Sheila knows the story of the goose that laid the golden eggs from the popular pantomime Mother Goose rather than from Aesop’s fable, which has the same title but ends in the death of the goose. For an anonymous early poem that tells the story of the pantomime, ‘Mother Goose and the Golden Egg’ (c. 1860), see here.

[3] This quotation is taken from Lynch’s account of herself, here given the title ‘Patricia Lynch (Mrs Richard A. Fox)’, at CatholicAuthors.com, here.

[4] The episode recalls the second stanza of Yeats’s ‘Sailing to Byzantium’, which famously runs: ‘An aged man is but a paltry thing, / A tattered coat upon a stick, unless / Soul clap its hands and sing, and louder sing, /For every tatter in its mortal dress’. The old Ballad Singer is an aged man who sings; while the scarecrow is more the type for studying ‘Monuments of its own magnificence’, being worshipped by rabbits and having a high opinion of itself in every way. Incidentally, Yeats died in 1939, the year of the book’s publication.

[5] This garda is one of several threatening policemen in Irish fantasy, from the policemen who arrest the Philosopher in James Stephens’s The Crock of Gold (1912) to the terrifying constables who populate Flann O’Brien’s The Third Policeman (c. 1940).

[6] ‘That is no country for old men’, begins Yeats’s poem ‘Sailing to Byzantium’, but Lynch’s Ireland is no country for young or old.

[7] Long Ears: The Story of a Little Grey Donkey (London: J. M. Dent and Sons, 1943, reprinted 1944), p. 2. All references are to this edition.

[8] In Lynch’s day Ireland was often represented in literature by a girl or old woman, most famously Cathleen ni Houlihan in Lady Gregory’s and Yeats’s 1902 play of that name, a role first performed by Lynch’s friend the celebrated nationalist Maude Gonne. Sheila’s green clothes make her a diminutive version of Cathleen, who is also a wanderer.

 

Fantasy 1939: Patricia Lynch, The Turf-Cutter’s Donkey Kicks Up His Heels.

Patricia Lynch

Patricia Lynch published two fantasy novels in 1939, both of which could be described as socialist utopias. Ireland was in great need of utopias at the end of the 1930s, and socialism was in Lynch’s blood, it seems.

Ireland was in her blood too, of course. Lynch’s parents were born in Cork; but the exact nature of Lynch’s own childhood relationship with Ireland is strangely uncertain.  She may have been born in Cork in 1898, as she claimed, but her marriage certificate gives the date as 1894, and the genealogist Denise Dowdall suggests that she was probably born in London in 1882. Her father may have died in Egypt when she was six, as she claims in her unreliable memoir A Storyteller’s Childhood (1947), but he may also have died in London in 1883, when she was eight months old, as Brian Maye points out in a piece for the Irish Times.[1] Her older sister Laura performed as a music hall artiste and disappeared from all records in 1901; Patricia never mentions her in her autobiographical writings, and Dowdall thinks she may have changed her name, as entertainers do, and so vanished into the mists of make-believe among which she made her living.[2] Patricia’s older brother Patrick (as she called him), or Henry Patrick (as everyone else did), was a London-based socialist and trade-union activist who died of pneumonia in December 1916. At the time Patricia too was based in London, writing as a journalist and committed to the cause of women’s suffrage. Early in 1916 she went to Dublin to report on the Easter Rising for Sylvia Pankhurst’s newspaper The Woman’s Dreadnought, later renamed The Worker’s Dreadnought. Posing as a schoolgirl, Lynch interviewed many women about their experiences of the Rising, and the resultant article, ‘Scenes from the Rebellion’, became famous both for its vivid account of the immediate aftermath of the incident and for its uniquely female perspective.[3] Her brother Patrick had been friends with one of the leaders of the Rising, James Connolly, and in 1922 she married another of Patrick’s friends, the socialist historian Richard Fox, author of several books about the struggle for Irish independence including Rebel Irishwomen (1935), Green Banners (1938) and James Connolly: The Forerunner (1943). After her marriage Lynch moved to Ireland with her husband, and it was here that she started publishing fiction, first in the newspaper The Irish Press and later for the London publisher J. M. Dent and Sons. In the end she wrote around fifty novels for children, ranging from folklore-inflected fantasy to historical fiction and social realism; many combine all three of these elements in different proportions. Lynch’s life story, then, is bound up with storytelling, as her memoir suggests, and elements of fiction are tightly enmeshed with her life story. In our current state of knowledge we can’t be sure where one ends and the other begins – at least, when it comes to her early childhood, which is the time of life she chooses to focus on in her novels.

Lynch, A Storyteller’s Childhood, illustration by Isobel Morton-Sale

What we can be sure of, though, is her socialism, as reflected in her work as a journalist, in her relationship with Richard Fox, and in her fifty-odd novels. Everything I’ve read of hers reflects her socialist convictions, as applied to the special circumstances of postcolonial Ireland. For the genealogist Denise Dowdall, Lynch is made up of contradictions:

The sweet, magical children’s tales of Lynch’s fiction belie the hard-nosed political radicalism that marked her early career in journalism. The obvious Cork brogue she gives herself in the dialogue passages of her autobiography is at odds with her life-long London accent. She was a Londoner with an apparent pre-occupation with Irish rural settings and at the same time an archetypal Irish writer who found a home for her books with a non-Irish publisher.[4]

I’d suggest, however, that Lynch’s ‘hard-nosed political radicalism’ didn’t so much belie her ‘sweet, magical children’s tales’ as mutate into them. The tales themselves formed part of Lynch’s own process of mutating into a fully-fledged Irishwoman; A Storyteller’s Childhood is packed with incidents that have close parallels in her fiction. The need for such a mutation – for reinventing oneself to integrate with a new community – is explained in her realist novel Fiddler’s Quest (1941), which is set in Dublin, the city she made her home. In it a young girl called Ethne Cadogan is taken out of an English convent school near Liverpool and sent to Ireland by her father while he migrates to America to seek his fortune, disappearing from her life in the process, as Lynch’s father disappeared from hers. In Dublin Ethne must rapidly adapt her behaviour, language and music to fit her new circumstances. She lodges with a generous, affectionate Dublin family while she waits for her grandfather to come and fetch her home to his island in the west. In the meantime she makes a name for herself by playing the fiddle, first for the family and their neighbours, later at Mac’s Dance Hall alongside professional musicians. Like Patricia, Ethne finds herself mixed up with the nationalist cause in Dublin soon after the Easter Rising, and the story ends with the young migrant and her host family making a hair’s-breadth escape to the west, taking with them an injured rebel and pursued by soldiers. At the end of her journey she finds her paternal grandfather, the famous fiddler ‘King Cadogan’, and a lively new rural community which embraces her at once as one of its own. For Ethne as for Patricia, making yourself at home involves reconciling yourself with your familial and national roots, a process that takes time, hard work, creativity, kindness and adaptability – a capacity to change your ways while remaining resolutely yourself throughout all the changes.

Lynch, A Storyteller’s Childhood, illustration by Isobel Morton-Sale

In this book, rural Ireland provides Lynch’s young protagonist with a model of communal living. Even working-class Dubliners such as the Raffertys look to rural Ireland for examples of neighbourly ways and cultural practices: from the ‘half-doors’ common in country cottages, through which one can conveniently interact with passers-by, to the shawls that provide their wearers with warmth in winter; from cooking to ceilidhs; from storytelling and ballad-singing to national and familial history.[5] Going west involves effectively going back into the past, where the soldiers acting on behalf of the British Government cannot reach you. The past is as safe a space in Dublin as it is in the country. The head of the Rafferty family, Mrs Rafferty, adheres to the old customs of her rural childhood, and so welcomes Ethne into her household without asking anything in return. Later an old Dublin ballad singer hides Ethne and the rebel fighter from the soldiers in a forgotten yard full of abandoned coaches and sedan chairs: ‘Hide in the past,’ the old woman tells them, ‘an the present can never find ye’ (p. 189). The past is also the place in which Ireland was ‘free and grand’, as one of the Rafferty children tells Ethne (p. 85). It isn’t entirely idealized – the ladies who rode out in those coaches often came home, the singer admits, sadder than when they left (p. 188) – but it’s somehow both over and done with, and hence no longer dangerous to the colonial authorities, and intensely present and alive, suffused with emotional energy by the songs and stories that drive the cause of independence in the years before the Civil War. The past interpenetrates the present, just as the rural west interpenetrates the Irish capital, offering glimpses of freedom and grandeur – and even sadness – that enrich all those who see and feel them. And the past belongs to Ethne and her migrant family as much as it does to the people of Dublin.

Like Lynch’s ‘Scenes from the Rebellion’, Fiddler’s Quest captures a moment in Irish history just after the Easter Rising, and does so from the point of view of women and girls. In adopting this female perspective it could be said to share the early feminism of James Connolly, Lynch’s brother’s friend, who was responsible for recruiting women and men on an equal basis into the Irish Citizen Army. Connolly also penned two plays that give women a central role in the struggle for independence, and wrote in The Reconquest of Ireland (1915) that if ‘The worker is the slave of capitalist society, the female worker is the slave of that slave’.[6] Patricia Lynch’s husband Richard Fox clearly shared Connolly’s proto-feminism, given his authorship of a book on Rebel Irishwomen.

James Connolly also argued that the Irish nationalist movement had been closely bound up from the beginning with socialist convictions, thanks to the ancient Irish customs of holding land in common and electing their leaders. As he writes in Labour in Irish History (1910):

It may surprise many readers to learn that up to the date above-mentioned [i.e. 1649] the basis of society in Ireland except within the Pale (a small strip of territory around the Capital city, Dublin), rested upon communal or tribal ownership of land. The Irish chief […] held his position upon the sufferance of his people, and as an administrator of the tribal affairs of his people, while the land or territory of the clan was entirely removed from his private jurisdiction. In the parts of Ireland where for 400 years after the first conquest (so-called) the English governors could not penetrate except at the head of a powerful army, the social order which prevailed in England – feudalism – was unknown, and as this comprised the greater portion of the country, it gradually came to be understood that the war against the foreign oppressor was also a war against private property in land. But with the forcible break up of the clan system in 1649, the social aspect of the Irish struggle sank out of sight, its place being usurped by the mere political expressions of the fight for freedom. Such an event was, of course, inevitable in any case. Communal ownership of land would undoubtedly have given way to the privately owned system of capitalist-landlordism, even if Ireland had remained an independent country, but coming as it did in obedience to the pressure of armed force from without, instead of by the operation of economic forces within, the change has been bitterly and justly resented by the vast mass of the Irish people, many of whom still mix with their dreams of liberty longings for a return to the ancient system of land tenure – now organically impossible.[7]

It’s this ‘ancient system of land tenure’ to which young Nono Rafferty refers in Fiddler’s Quest when she tells Ethne that the rebels ‘want to make Ireland free and grand, like in the ancient times’ (p. 85, my emphasis). For Connolly, freedom took the form of a socialist republic in which men and women were equal partners, and the place where an early version of such a republic persisted longest was beyond the Pale, in rural Ireland.[8]

Illustration by Eileen Coghlan

If Fiddler’s Quest takes place shortly after the Easter Rising, the moment occupied by Lynch’s two 1939 fantasies is not so easily located, but both speak directly to the moment in which they were written. One depicts an Irish rural community which offers a model of communal living, like the West of Ireland in the later novel; the other introduces a chosen family which wanders through an Irish countryside which has not yet reached its potential as an egalitarian space dedicated to the principle of mutual support. One is embedded in an Irish past which interacts freely with the present, lending it strength and energy; the other inhabits a kind of mist in which the potential for such a fusion between past and present is glimpsed in fragments before being finally realised. Both have young girls as protagonists, and in both the girls’ rich imaginations combine with their rich capacity for affection to shape the place they live in for the better. Both focus on the poor and the labouring classes, and contain not a single character who can be described as ruling class. Lynch places marginal people at the centre of her narrative – children, women, rural labourers, travellers, sentient animals and birds – giving them direct access to the myths and legends of Irish literature, and thereby making them the heroes of the newly-fledged Irish nation thanks to their link with egalitarian ancient Ireland.

In the 1930s, Irish children in particular took on an important role in preserving those myths and legends. Lynch’s fantastic fiction of the decade coincided with a major initiative in Irish folklore which drew on the memories of children and their families as a major resource. In 1937, when de Valera formally established Ireland as a republic (replacing the Irish Free State, which recognised the King of England as its constitutional monarch), the Irish Folklore Commission invited schoolchildren throughout the country to gather folkloric material for what became the Schools’ Collection:

Over the course of two years, roughly 50,000 children representing almost 5,000 schools, from every county of Ireland (save for the six disputed counties that would become Northern Ireland), collected both English and Gaelic lore, in neat penmanship. Together they gathered almost three-quarters of a million pages’ worth of documentation.[9]

1939 marked the completion of the project, and both Lynch’s novels of that year could be said to pay tribute to the importance of children as custodians of the Irish past, in particular its fairy stories. In The Turf-Cutter’s Donkey Kicks Up His Heels – the third instalment of Lynch’s famous series of books about a donkey that serves as a catalyst for supernatural events – the child protagonists are constantly slipping into an alternative Ireland of the past inhabited by fairies and the heroes of old Irish literature. Most adults in the book don’t pay much heed to the supernatural, past or present; the children’s father, for instance – the turf-cutter of the title – believes that such things are the exclusive province of the young, which makes his son Seamus reluctant to tell him anything about them:

Seamus put his head sideways on the table and made a face at Eileen. He didn’t want her to say anything about the leprechaun, for it was no use at all talking to the turf-cutter about magic. He didn’t believe in it. He thought strange things happened to Eileen and Seamus because they were young, that was all.[10]

The children, on the other hand, accept the presence of leprechauns, ancient warriors and magic-working wise women as readily as they accept the presence of the turf-cutter’s neighbours and fellow workers. Eileen has her imagination prepared for this acceptance of magic by her love of ‘story-books’, printed pamphlets full of strange tales and high adventures. One imagines that the fairy tales retold by Lady Wilde, W B Yeats and James Stephens might be among them, though we know from earlier books in the series that she also likes stories about pirates and native Americans. Lynch’s own novel takes its place as one of these story-books for children, despised by some as ‘only fit for babies’ (p. 157) but recognised by others – not least the socialist and nationalist James Stephens – as in some sense a template for a truly democratic, imaginatively liberated Ireland. Sheila, the child protagonist of The Grey Goose of Kilnevin, shares Eileen’s predilection for story books, and carries hers with her on her adventures in a basket, so that they become increasingly battered and weatherworn as the novel goes on. Sheila herself is an accomplished storyteller and an attentive listener to oral stories. At the end of the book, when she returns after many adventures to her hometown of Kilnevin, she is given a ‘green-and-gold story book’ by a local woman as a gift to mark her return.[11] At the same time she finds a permanent physical home for herself and her travel companions in the town, which suggests that for Lynch home is the place where fairy tales and stories for children both get told and find their fulfilment. Depicting that fulfilment in fiction may risk having one’s stories dismissed as ‘only fit for babies’, but may also lay the groundwork for a confident, politically radical new community, in which the voices and desires of children are as fondly treasured as the voices and desires of women and men.

Illustration by Eileen Coghlan

Both of Lynch’s 1939 fantasies give a prominent place to the present as well as the past. The turf-cutter’s cabin is linked to the modern world by the motorised barge that carries the turf to the rest of the country, crewed by the eccentric Captain Cassidy and his mate Tim Quinlan. Their role in the text is very similar to that of the captain and crew of the steamer Granuaile in Fiddler’s Quest, who link Dublin to England and the rest of the world via the Irish Sea, but also extend the warmest of Irish welcomes to the lonely migrant Ethne when she boards their vessel at the Liverpool docks. The Grey Goose of Kilnevin embraces the romance of rail travel when Sheila and her friends board a train to get to the races – though Sheila nearly gets excluded from that romance when she finds she hasn’t the money to pay the fare. Automobiles turn up occasionally in the Grey Goose, and a lorry can be found in the second turf-cutter’s donkey book, The Turf-Cutter’s Donkey Goes Visiting (1935), driven and eventually crashed by Tim Quinlan and Captain Cassidy. But motorised vehicles are always rare and glamorous; and they sometimes get mixed up with the stranger glamour of the Irish past. This happens when a circus passes the turf-cutter’s cottage in The Turf-Cutter’s Donkey Kicks Up His Heels, its ‘steam-driven’ lorries (p. 142) packed with exotic animals, clowns, and wizards who can do real magic (albeit by accident), and accompanied by a girl who later gets offered the ring and role of the Queen of the Fairies. It happens again when a delivery man’s lorry mutates into Santa’s sleigh in the final chapter, while Santa himself gets replaced by an Irish leprechaun and some animal friends.[12] Most strikingly of all, a Silver Airman crops up from time to time throughout the child protagonists’ adventures, appearing at a crucial moment to rescue them from the clutches of marauding Danes in ancient Ireland. The Airman is dressed in silver armour, like a hero of old, his plane is anchored to the earth of Ireland by a line, like a child’s kite, and he seems able to fly in and out of the past with ease, collecting souvenirs as he goes in the form of eagle’s eggs and memorable ‘wonders’. Lynch’s Ireland, in other words, is no preindustrial idyll, but its industrial machinery is enmeshed with the land, water, beasts and history of the nation, complementing them as Dublin complements the Irish countryside to which its workers’ imaginations are always turning.

The Turf-Cutter’s Donkey Kicks Up His Heels revolves around the cottage on the edge of the bog where the turf-cutter lives with his wife and two children. In the first book of the sequence, The Turf-Cutter’s Donkey (1934), the house was rebuilt from the ground upwards using a leprechaun’s gold, as if to affirm the crucial link between the material present and the imaginative world of Irish storytelling in which Eileen loves to spend her time. The second book took the child protagonists, Eileen and Seamus, away from the cottage to a nearby island for a short vacation; but in the third the cottage becomes the waystation where travellers from all over Ireland meet, talk, refresh themselves and rest; as Seamus tells one of the travellers, ‘Everyone comes to our house’ (p. 185), which means you can find whoever or whatever you’re looking for there, from family relations to distant ancestors to shelter, meals and conversation. It contains just enough to meet the family’s needs, with a little bit over to share with passers-by. Leprechauns, airmen, circus ringmasters, labourers and celebrities find a welcome there, turning it into a hub from which journeys begin and end and through which they pass, a still point of the turning world, as Eliot might put it – though without the religious implications of that phrase from his 1936 poem Burnt Norton (neither novel contains a religious figure in the present, though The Turf-Cutter’s Donkey Kicks Up His Heels includes a meeting with a hermit-priest from Ireland’s past). The book is full, in fact, of journeys whose beginnings and endings are never traced; Eileen and Seamus touch those journeys at a certain point, then watch wonderingly as they continue into the mists of the past or future. The cottage and its occupants remain stable, but change the trajectory of those journeys in crucial ways. It becomes, in fact, the centre of Ireland, and so of the world with which Ireland is linked by many narrative threads, as the cottage is linked to Dublin by the nearby canal. And it offers hope for the future to a planet on the brink of an all-encompassing war.[13]

Illustration by Eileen Coghlan

The turf-cutter’s trade is literally practised in and with the soil of Ireland, and the cottage is rooted in the soil from the start of the novel. That this gives it just enough to manage forms the basis of the book’s economics, just as it formed the basis of de Valera’s economics for the new republic, whereby Ireland was encouraged to draw on its own natural resources thanks to a system of tariffs on imported goods, thus confirming its hard-won independence from its British neighbours.[14] In the opening section, the turf-cutter’s children, Eileen and Seamus, decide they would like the cottage garden to yield better returns in flowers and vegetables. When Seamus looks out of the window, he sees only:

a big patch of potatoes and a smaller one of cabbage. A few plants grew by the door and under the windows, but the rest was a wilderness. The turf-cutter and his wife had no time for gardening, while the children thought it was a fine place to play in – that was all. (p. 10).

Inspired by a ‘big, dusty book’ that belonged to their grandfather the children determine to create a garden like one of the coloured pictures, ‘where pinks, roses, lavenders, primroses, sweet peas, stock, candytuft, sunflowers, sweet william, and flowers the children had never seen or even heard of were growing all together’ (p. 10). Pooling their modest resources, the children head to town after school the following day, and find themselves in a gardening shop with magical properties, whose proprietor has limbs that can extend themselves at will, like the limbs of the engineer in the Ghibli movie Spirited Away (‘when the man reached out with his feather duster his arm grew so long that he could dust any part of the shop without moving’, p. 14). No explanation is offered for his strange abilities; he simply exists, like a working model of capitalism, and gets left behind as soon as they leave the shop clutching a poke of magic seeds. Like the man who gave the magic beans to Jack in the fairy tale, he tells them that if they plant those seeds successfully ‘ye’ll have the most remarkable garden in all Ireland’ (p. 16), wishes them ‘quick growing’, then vanishes from their lives for ever. But unlike Jack, the children find the seeds mostly unhelpful. Instead of producing a garden like the one in the picture book, they create a jungle full of hypertrophied plants and giant insects: ‘Eileen ‘screamed when an earwig as big as a cat scuttled out on the path in front of her’; she ‘hated earwigs more than any other insect’ (p. 23). The children must call on the services of their magic-wielding friend Sreng to banish the insects – but in doing so they must also rid themselves of the flowers and vegetables, since as Sreng puts it, ‘The good and the bad, you must take them all or lose them all’ (p. 27). The garden of excess, then, brings with it unexpected disadvantages, and so might serve as a metaphor for the philosophy of constant growth at the heart of capitalism, which makes the space in which it is practised so hard to inhabit for so many of its subjects.

Illustration by John Keating

Sreng is another passing visitor to the cottage, this time from the past, as well as the industrial present represented by the canal where he lives and works. He enthusiastically supports the children’s project of improving the garden by providing them with a bag of magic earth for their seeds, brought with him from the legendary time in which he had his origins.  For Sreng is a warrior of the Firbolgs, the ancient inhabitants of Ireland, a ‘little dark man’ (p. 17) who is always being mistaken for a child (p. 42) and (ironically) a foreigner in the present day, and the bag contains earth ‘so old that a year is but as a day and a day is the same as a year to it’ (p. 19). Planted in this earth, the shopkeeper’s seeds germinate freely, despite the fact that they are being planted at the wrong time of year. Sreng’s participation in the garden project makes it something more than a metaphor for capitalism; it can also represent the prosperous future promised to the liberated Irish people by their own imaginations and those of their elected officials, de Valera among them. As it turns out, there is no short cut to such collective prosperity; only hard work, which Sreng provides along with the children, and time and patience in conjunction with the naturally occurring seasons will bring it about – unless one seeks magical help, which can bring chaos instead of order.

Sreng helps the children dig the garden before planting the magic seeds in the magic earth he has provided, but it is Sreng who points out that they must take the good along with the bad if they are to enjoy the fruits of these labours, and it is he who puts an end to the magic at their request, shooting at the giant insects with his non-fatal magic arrows until they have all returned to the proper size, and in the process signalling the end of ‘fast growing’ in the cottage garden. Magical growth, then, is another brief visitor to the cottage, lasting no longer than a day. Its aura lingers for a while in the neighbourhood, in the form of a single crop of giant flowers and vegetables, which win the children prizes at the local show and provide free food for their friends and neighbours. As their mother points out, ‘The Captain and Tim Quinlan would be glad of a few head of lettuce and a bunch of rhubarb’, while ‘there’s some of the bog people have never eaten anything in their lives but cabbage or potato’ (p. 30). Her response to a surfeit is to share it, so that Sreng’s and the shopkeeper’s magic of excess never disrupts the customs of mutual help that govern the rural community.

Illustration by Eileen Coghlan

The children first met Sreng in The Turf-Cutter’s Donkey, bringing him with them to the present where he found a permanent home with Captain Cassidy and Tim Quinlan. He remains a migrant, then, constantly in motion between the country and the city on the Captain’s barge, his foreignness instantly noticed by passers-by owing to his dark skin and strange accent. But despite his travels, from past to present, from country to city, Sreng is no more a foreigner then any Irishman; rather he is one example of the many waves of migrants that made up the Irish population throughout history. Eileen and Seamus first knew him as a leader of the Firbolg people as they fought to defend their land against a new wave of invaders, the Tuatha Dé Dannan, who became the pagan gods of Irish legend; but the Firbolgs were themselves invaders, and distantly related to the Tuatha Dé Dannan despite the marked differences in their appearance after many generations. The notion of racial purity has no place in old Irish culture. In The Turf-Cutter’s Donkey Kicks Up His Heels Sreng accompanies the children on a second trip to the past, this time to encounter yet another wave of migrants, the marauding Danes. The first Dane the children meet is an eccentric figure in the present day, like the elastic shopkeeper: a ‘tall dark man dressed in strange clothes who was digging potatoes in a field’ (p. 65), behind a half-submerged house which looks ‘like a big doll’s house, with its bow-windows and its pointed red roof’ – very different, in other words, from the other buildings in the neighbourhood, which are either ‘cabins’ like the turf-cutter’s cottage or larger farmhouses (p. 63). Later it emerges that this doll’s house is in fact ‘the great rock which marked the grave of the Dane’, and the man in strange clothes is the Dane himself; as Sreng points out, ‘’Twas surely the Dane who […] showed you a toy house that was not there’ (p. 95). In the past the Danes were invaders, but in the children’s present they have merged with the Irish earth and the Irish people, participating enthusiastically in the familiar Irish pastime of digging and eating ‘praties’. They may retain their acquisitive properties – the Dane seeks to exchange a pratie for a pair of Sreng’s magic arrows in the children’s possession – but their penchant for violence is reduced to flinging handfuls of mud when the children refuse the bargain. Danish warriors and everyday Irish mischief-makers have merged over time and become indistinguishable.[15]

Soon after this encounter, the children find themselves whisked back to a more dangerous time for Ireland, when the woods are full of wolves and the Dane’s rapacious countrymen moor their longships in Irish rivers as they sack and pillage the nearby communities. Sreng meets Eileen and Seamus in the wolf-ridden woods, having been whisked into the past by the same magic that took the children there, and together they rescue a hermit-priest from the ship where he has been imprisoned by the Danes, returning him to his cell near another prominent rock. The invaders pursue them and lay siege to the rock, but are driven off by the Silver Airman, whose aeroplane looks to them like a monstrous bird. After that the children return with the Airman to their own time, leaving the hermit behind in his cell, on his insistence, to fulfil his Christian duty: ringing a silver bell each morning to mark the arrival of Christianity in the furthest corner of Europe (p. 87). Sreng, then, repeatedly links Eileen and Seamus to times when violent warriors have threatened Ireland’s population. On this occasion the children rescue an old priest from the threat of enslavement or death, freeing him to return to his work of spreading peace with the aid of his bell; and the continuing presence of the Dane in the present day, digging praties like a local, confirms the fact that for all the pain it involved, the violent past laid solid foundations for the modern Irish nation.

Illustration by Eileen Coghlan

In 1939, Ireland was again surrounded by potential invaders, from the Nazis, who had long been flexing their military muscles, to the British, from whose imperial grip Ireland had only recently prized itself free. When war broke out in September Ireland declared its neutrality, refusing to be enlisted in the British military cause as it had been in 1914. Lynch’s hermit-priest, the fearless old man who refuses to abandon his post despite his recent imprisonment and the continuing threat of marauding Danes and ravening wolves in the nearby forest, makes the choice of non-violence a form of heroism as impressive as the feats of the ancient warriors who inspire Seamus. In the two previous books, Eileen and Seamus – especially the latter – found themselves drawn to the warrior-heroes of old Ireland as if by a spell; indeed, Seamus was twice tempted to join a magically-resurrected warrior band, being restrained only by his small size and the love of his sister.[16] In The Turf-Cutter’s Donkey Kicks Up His Heels he again finds himself taking on the role of warrior, clutching a rusty spear given him by Sreng, but heroic posturing proves no match for the ferocious Danes, and he, Sreng and Eileen must rely on the Silver Airman to escape from the top of the rock where they have been penned. Throughout the novel, reconciliation proves more effective than violence as a means of keeping peace. Sreng’s arrows never hurt the people or creatures he shoots at; they are weapons of deterrence or self-defence, not conflict. The children make friends with most of the strangers they encounter, and any enemies they may have made by accident are quickly turned into friends by the end of the book, or at least deprived of any power they had to harm the people they despise. The turf-cutter’s cabin is neutral ground, like Ireland, and offers safety as well as provisions to those who need them.

Illustration by Eileen Coghlan

At one point in the narrative, Seamus gets suddenly transformed by magic into an eagle, and flies off to the eyrie of another eagle in the far-off mountains. This eagle is one of a pair which have attacked the children several times in the first two books; they are servants of the wicked Wise Woman of Youghal who has plotted for years to make Eileen and Seamus into her slaves. Becoming an eagle shows Seamus for the first time that the eagles, too, have been enslaved, and he is in any case naturally empathetic with animals. Restored to his true form in the eagle’s nest, he frees the bird from a length of rope in which it has got itself entangled, and in return it flies him safely home to his own part of the country. Nations throughout history have adopted the eagle as an emblem of power, not least Nazi Germany. Lynch’s eagles, by contrast, are merely birds which have been exploited for evil purposes by scheming humans, and like most other people they will gladly reciprocate kindness wherever they meet it. The eagle entangled itself in the rope when it launched an attack on the Silver Airman’s rescue plane, to which the rope was attached; acts of violence against others, then, are also acts of self-harm, and Seamus’s lesson in inter-species cooperation offers a wholesome alternative philosophy to the one that threatened to engulf Europe at the time of writing.

Shortly afterwards the children free a second wild animal from enslavement. Seamus returns from his visit to the eagle’s eyrie to find himself on the back of a circus elephant, riding round the ring to rapturous applause from the massed spectators, among whom is his sister Eileen. Fed up of adventures, Seamus decides to ride the elephant out of the ring and home to the cottage, and the elephant concurs at once, since he ‘had long wanted to stray about the world’ as an independent traveller (p. 126). Eileen afterwards substitutes a magic toy elephant for the real one (she acquired the toy from a mysterious stranger in The Turf-cutter’s Donkey, so Lynch’s readers already know it can grow to full size and come to life whenever she asks it to), and the real elephant vanishes at once into the Irish countryside, while the toy takes its place in the circus. Eileen does not worry about the real elephant, we’re told, since it’s ‘too big’ to get into trouble, and can in any case find a home in Dublin Zoo if it ever gets ‘lonesome’ (p. 141). We must, then, presume that the circus elephant becomes another successful immigrant in Ireland, free to explore its new environment at will and liberated from the oppression represented by the showman (who affronts its dignity by calling it ‘brute’) and his sidekick the circus wizard (who pinches the elephant’s trunk when the showman’s back is turned). Beasts as well as people may find a welcome in the Irish bogs if they choose to seek it.

Illustration by Eileen Coghlan

A similar liberation is offered to another circus performer – or rather two, a girl and an animal. Goldilocks is touted by the showman as ‘the most beautiful equestrienne in Europe’, while her horse White Wings has ‘the longest mane and tail in the world’ (p. 113). Eileen and Seamus absorb these hyperboles of circus rhetoric with uncritical enthusiasm; but they also recognise links between this seemingly unmatchable star and their own everyday existence. Seamus is sure he can match the equestrian skills of Goldilocks if he gets access to her horse, while Eileen sees her as a figure from one of her cherished story books, a fairy tale princess; Goldilocks is even reading a story book on horseback as the circus travels along the road that runs past the turf-cutter’s cottage (pp. 143-4). So the children invite her home, together with White Wings, convinced that she is someone like themselves who will appreciate the things they love about their lives: imaginative trips into the world of fairy tales, energetically physical adventures, acquaintance with fascinating people like their friends and parents. Instead they quickly learn the difference between story book princesses and real girls who adopt the airs of European royalty. It is Goldilocks who dismisses Eileen’s story books as ‘only fit for babies’ (p. 157), and she laughs at the Captain and Tim Quinlan when they come visiting, while mastering the show horse White Wings proves far beyond Seamus’s capabilities. In the end, Goldilocks is no more at home in the children’s cabin than her namesake was in the house of the three bears, and Eileen and Seamus are relieved to see her go, even though they lose White Wings in the process.

Yet where Goldilocks goes when she disappears from the cottage remains a mystery, like the question of what happened to Lynch’s artiste-sister. She may have gone back to the circus to resume her life as a European celebrity; or she may have ridden off to take up her destiny as a fairy tale princess. While she stayed at the cottage, the leprechaun who befriended the children in The Turf-Cutter’s Donkey – and who later accompanied them on holiday in The Turf-Cutter’s Donkey Goes Visiting – visits the cottage with a proposal for her; he offers her a ring that will make her Queen of Tir na nOg if she accepts it, and Eileen never learns whether or not she took up the post when she eloped that night from Eileen’s bedroom. One way or another, the leprechaun’s offer confirms the children’s view of Goldilocks in relation to themselves. It is their closest fairy friend who makes the proposal, which means that these shoeless rural children share something of Goldilocks’s unmatchable glamour, being at least as familiar with wonders as any star of stage or ring.

Lynch, Long Ears, illustration by Joan Kiddell-Monroe

As it happens, Goldilocks’s visit also offers the children a chance to show off their own special qualities. In the only chapter in the book without magic in it, Eileen decides to bake Goldilocks a cake worthy of her regal demeanour. Unfortunately it’s the first time she has ever tried to make one, and she has no guidance, since her mother is not at home. The results are predictable. She uses up all the cottage’s supply of eggs – which amount to four, one for each member of the family – and reduces the kitchen to a state of chaos, while the cake comes out of the oven as a shapeless black mass ‘like a lump of turf’ (p. 167). At the same time, the baking process, in which Seamus joins with enthusiasm and abundant supportive comments (‘hurray!’ he cries as they cut the cake, ‘Look! It isn’t really so bad. It’s only dark brown, and mebbe that’s the spice’, p. 167), showcases the loving relationship between brother and sister, while the disastrous outcome allows their parents too to display their talent for collective living. On walking into the shipwrecked kitchen at the end of a hard day’s work, the turf-cutter is at first forgivably angry, but he quickly chides himself for letting his temper get the better of him and begs his children’s pardon (‘say yez forgive me for getting’ into the tantrums’, p. 169). His wife, meanwhile, helps the children clean up the mess, promises to bake another cake the following morning with their help, and finds a soda cake ‘that Eileen had overlooked’ for the family to eat for dinner. Goldilocks may be worthy of a throne, but the children occupy a better space: a lovingly egalitarian household, in which mutually supportive labour, of the kind they practised as they baked their ‘lump of turf’, is more highly prized than high birth, good looks or personal accomplishments. No wonder the resulting cake was compared to the turf or peat by which the family wins its bread.

Travellers are of two kinds in The Turf-Cutter’s Donkey Kicks Up His Heels. On the one hand there are the travellers who obey the unwritten rules of the road, as laid down by James Stephens in The Crock of Gold (1912) and The Demi-Gods (1914): they share any food they have, offer entertainment in the form of songs or stories, treat animals well and respect the property and needs of others. Of this kind are the Captain and Tim Quinlan in their barge, the warrior Sreng who joins them, and the Silver Airman. On the other hand there are the travellers who put their own interests before those of anyone they meet on the road, refusing to share things, despising strangers, and treating beasts with casual cruelty. Of this kind are the Danes of ancient times, the circus showman and his wizard, and the tinkers met by the children in Chapter Six, on the way to the market where they plan to show their giant vegetables. Tinkers represent a blind spot in Lynch’s utopian vision for Ireland. On the one hand there is an undeniable allure about their wandering way of life, so that Eileen, for instance, plays games with her dolls involving travellers (whom she calls gypsies) as well as pirates and native Americans; on the other they abuse both people and animals, as the turf-cutter’s donkey knows too well, having lived with them before the children freed him in the first book of the series. As they descend on the children’s donkey-cart and snatch vegetables without asking, the tinkers sing ‘The Song of the Tinker’s Tribute’, which summarizes their lives in Lynch’s universe:

Bread from the oven,
Butter from the churn,
Praties from the patch,
Cabbage from the plot,
Take what we can:
Eat when we may. (p. 32)

The song places the tinkers outside the economy that sustains Ireland in Lynch’s books, an economy based on labour, especially labour connected with working the land, and a fair distribution of the products of labour, such as food, shelter, clothing, and the occasional luxury such as Eileen’s story books or her toy elephant. José Lanters argues that the only tinkers Lynch depicts with sympathy are those who aspire to settling down, and while there are exceptions here and there in her writing, it seems to me that Lanters has put her finger on the reason for Lynch’s distrust of certain kinds of travelling culture.[17] Her hopes for Ireland and its future are firmly rooted in communal cultivation of the soil, and the rootlessness of committed travellers, when combined with a fierce contempt for those who work the land, can be seen as militating against this agrarian vision.

Illustration by Eileen Coghlan

The second appearance of the tinkers sets them against the first kind of traveller I listed, the kind who freely share provisions, disseminate songs and stories, treat animals with kindness and respect the property and needs of others. Soon after she bakes her cake Eileen falls foul of her old enemy, the Wise Woman of Youghal, who shrinks her by magic and traps her in a toadstool house in hopes of acquiring the ring of the Queen of Tir na nOg, which the leprechaun gave to Goldilocks. As Seamus is looking for his vanished sister he comes across another wanderer, an old apple woman named Mary Anne, who is also, as it happens, looking for a sister. It emerges that this lost sister is the Wise Woman, that she has a name – Sally Anne – and that she once lived outside the town of Youghal. These mundane facts at once reduce her to the stature of an ordinary human being, and the apple woman suggests that she only turned bad when she went wandering (‘now she’s taken to roving, an’ I’m not going to let her bring discredit on her family, not if I can help it’, p. 182). The apple woman is a wanderer, like the Wise Woman, and may share her sister’s ability to work magic, since she accidentally frees Eileen from the toadstool with a magic golden nut Seamus found earlier; but she also earns a ‘dacent living’, as she puts it, selling apples on the roads of Ireland, a calling the Wise Woman rejected when she took to roving. The Grey Goose of Kilnevin features another kindly apple woman, who like Mary Anne is generous with her apples and never works magic, and Lynch mentions these wandering tradeswomen with affection in A Storyteller’s Childhood.[18] Perhaps her affection stems in part from the association of these travellers with the fruits of the soil, as well as their legitimate acquisition of those fruits from the growers’ trees.

Meanwhile Mary Anne’s ability to expose the Wise Woman’s earthly roots seems to give her power over her roving sister. When the children and the apple woman are attacked by tinker children led by Sally Anne, Mary Anne drives her sister away by hitting her over the head repeatedly with her empty apple basket, and the Wise Woman seems unable to stop her, despite the potency of her spells. The scene ends with the two old women disappearing ‘out of sight and hearing’ like the other travellers in the book (p. 189), and the reader never finds out if the wicked witch returned at last to her roots in Youghal. Eileen and Seamus, on the other hand, go home with the fruits of their labour, nuts and mushrooms; they are always harvesting the land, it seems (earlier in the book it was blackberries, and earlier still the giant vegetables), and this is part of what makes their lives utopian. On this occasion they also bring home the golden nut, which the apple woman dropped by accident after Seamus gave it to her as a present; the other utopian aspect of the children’s lives is their love of sharing. Their mother keeps the nut in a teapot for the apple woman, should she ever come to collect it (as she probably will), while Seamus persuades her to keep the golden husk of the nut as a thimble, so that a single object becomes the shared property of two people. It’s this instinct for collective living that the tinkers lack, according to Lynch, and that excludes them from the rural idyll she shapes in her books.

Lynch, The Turf-Cutter’s Donkey Goes Visiting, illustration by George Altendorf

In Lynch’s Ireland, even the most capitalist of ceremonies, Christmas, becomes a celebration of collective living. In the final chapter of the novel, on a snowy Christmas Eve, a procession of people and animals come to the turf-cutter’s cabin hoping for something to eat: first a robin and some other birds, then a ‘small ragged man’ with a pig and a squirrel, who turns out to be the children’s old friend the local leprechaun, transmuted here into another wanderer. Seamus and Eileen show hospitality to all these visitors, Seamus inviting them into the kitchen, while Eileen generously divides her one and only baked treat – a man made of leftover dough from a loaf of currant bread – with the hungry leprechaun and his animal companions. As they eat, Eileen tells the leprechaun about the modest Christmas she is expecting. The turf-cutting trade has been poor this year (‘it’s been a desprit bad year for us on the bog’, the turf-cutter observes on p. 197), the children have no baubles to put on the little tree in the yard they have selected as their Christmas tree, and all the presents on offer are home-made. They have nothing fancy to eat on the festive day itself because unlike some other Irish children they have no ‘uncles in America’ (p. 198). Yet what they have is freely shared with friends and strangers, as it always has been, and the leprechaun ensures this brings them the seasonal banquet they deserve. A mysterious sack is delivered, the tree in the yard sprouts baubles and toys, Santa Claus puts in a fleeting appearance – despite the fact that Seamus doesn’t believe in him – and the leprechaun introduces himself, his pig and his squirrel to the children’s parents – despite the turf-cutter’s scepticism about magic creatures and supernatural episodes (in fact the parents see him as yet another human traveller, a little old man with a dog and cat). The leprechaun introduces himself on this occasion as ‘UNCLEFROMAMERICA’, and opens the sack to reveal a hamper full of treasures: ‘a roast goose, brown and shining, a Limerick ham, black and white puddings, sausages in strings, a jar of ginger, a tin of biscuits, a jar of jam, a box of crackers, a tin of sweets, a canister of tea’ (p. 207). Clearly these gifts are intended to reward the family’s generosity, despite their poverty, just as Santa is said to reward good conduct with a well-filled Christmas stocking. But thanks to the presence of the leprechaun, this particular Christmas miracle has a uniquely Irish flavour. Santa plays second fiddle here to the emissary from fairyland, who invokes the American Irish diaspora to make the festival more festive than it could have been if the turf-cutter and his family had been forced to depend on their own resources, as they have done in the story to this point. De Valera wanted Ireland to be largely self-sufficient – and many of the contents of the hamper are Irish, such as the Limerick ham – but Lynch seems to suggest that some of the nation’s resources lie overseas, in the shape of emigrants who had escaped the harsh conditions of Irish rural life, and in some cases found a better life elsewhere. In combination, the resources of Ireland and the resources of America could enrich the lives of both cultures, if divided fairly between them.

Lynch, in fact, could be said to have been urging her American readers to participate in the culture of sharing they have encountered throughout her novel. Interestingly, The Turf-Cutter’s Donkey Kicks Up His Heels was the only book in the series to be published in the United States before it appeared in Britain or Ireland. The 1939 edition was published not by J. M. Dent, Lynch’s British publishers, but E. P. Dutton, Dent’s American distributors; the first British edition didn’t appear until 1946, by which time the fourth book in the series, Long Ears (1943), had already been published in Britain by Dent. Long Ears tells the story of the titular donkey from his birth to the day he came into the turf-cutter’s possession; it therefore brings the series full circle, completing the journey begun by Lynch in the first book when Eileen, Seamus and Long Ears had their first adventure together. The Turf-Cutter’s Donkey Kicks Up His Heels instead focuses on the hard but ‘dacent’ life of Irish labourers and their families; and it ends by invoking the spirit of Christmas, which has long been the time when children’s story books are traditionally bought as presents for children whose relatives can afford them. Books are precious objects to Eileen, although her battered specimens earn the contempt of the queenly Goldilocks; while the middle-class children who read Lynch’s book could be said to have enriched themselves with treasure in the form of knowledge about the lives and culture of the Irish workers who were their ancestors, and who remain their kin across the ocean. Those middle-class readers might also have been struck by the radical difference between Eileen’s living conditions and their own. One wonders, then, if Lynch and her publishers aimed to encourage greater generosity towards their Irish kin from any well-heeled aunts or uncles from America – real or imagined – who happened to read it to their offspring in the comfort of their homes?

Lynch, The Turf-Cutter’s Donkey, illustration by Jack Yeats

The French film director Alain Resnais, whose most popular movie was Mon Oncle d’Amérique (1980), described the America of his childhood as a magical country which could be accessed through the silver screen:

“You know, for all European kids of my age, America was a kind of fairyland […] We were born with the idea that there was another kind of country where everything was easy and perfect, like cartoon films, and there was a lot of money and freedom. I remember that when I was ten [i.e. in 1932] and I was looking at the French flag, I didn’t feel a thing. But when I was looking at the American flag, my heart was really beating.”[19]

For American children, on the other hand, Ireland could be a ‘kind of fairyland’, full of leprechauns with crocks of gold and ancient gods and heroes of the kind described by James Stephens in his Irish Fairy Tales (1920), or Padraic Colum in The King of Ireland’s Son (1916). Lynch’s leprechaun sings a song which magically transforms the contents of Santa’s sack from a heap of fallen leaves – which is all Seamus sees when he first opens it – into a lavish Christmas feast: ‘Leaves in the bag change as I sit: / Gold in the crock and the candle is lit’ (p. 206). At the time of writing, emigration was depleting the Irish countryside; the harsh conditions endured by the turf-cutter and his family drove many of their neighbours to seek a better life elsewhere.[20] A miracle was needed to stem this flood of emigration, and Lynch’s novel provides one, jointly achieved through a collaboration between the Irish fairies and the Irish Americans, both of whom could be seen as legendary in their generosity. For Lynch, in fact, generosity itself was the miracle needed to make life in Ireland worth living, while an attractive home, like the turf-cutter’s cabin, was needed to encourage the end of the travelling life to which so many emigrants were committing themselves. The one could enable the other, her representation of the cabin generating generosity and imaginative investment in the Irish countryside within her readers, while these two kinds of investment encouraged the Irish people to commit themselves for life to the Irish countryside.

Needless to say, this was never a practical model for the regeneration of Ireland’s economy, but Lynch’s utopian vision of the nation’s present and future – growing organically from Ireland’s turbulent past, through the strange adventures of Eileen and Seamus – may well have planted fresh seeds of affection for Ireland at home and abroad. She herself had started out as an emigrant and a traveller, wandering from one setting to another along with her family until she seized the chance to return to the land of her ancestry. Here she dedicated herself to reimagining that land and her own childhood, finding fruitful soil in both for a better future. The Turf-Cutter’s Donkey Kicks Up His Heels endures as a testament to hope in times of conflict. As such it deserves revisiting by readers on both sides of the Atlantic, as well as on either side of the Irish Sea.

Illustration by Eileen Coghlan

NOTES

[1] See Patricia Lynch, A Storyteller’s Childhood (London: J. M. Dent and Sons, 1947), p. 88, and Brian Maye, ‘The Godmother of Irish Children’s Literature’, The Irish Times, 26 August 2022. You can find Maye’s article here.

[2] See Denise Dowdall, ‘Patricia Lynch: A Storyteller’s Childhood Revisited’, Historyeye 2015. You can find it here.

[3] For further thoughts on Lynch’s account of the Easter Rising see my blog post of March 17 2016, ‘The Political Imagination: Irish Fantasy Writers and the Easter Rising’. You can find it here. For the full text of Lynch’s ‘Scenes from the Rebellion’ see here.

[4] Denise Dowdall, ‘Patricia Lynch: A Storyteller’s Childhood Revisited’, Historyeye 2015. You can find it here.

[5] Their looking back to the culture of rural Ireland is summarised in the nostalgic song sung by the old man Billy at a family ceilidh, ‘Me home’s a wee cabin upon a high hill’, Fiddler’s Quest (London: J. M. Dent and Sons, 1941, reprinted 1943), pp. 72-3.

[6] James Connolly, The Reconquest of Ireland, Chapter VI, ‘Woman’. You can find it here.

[7] James Connolly, Labour in Irish History, Chapter 1, ‘The Lessons of History’. You can find it here.

[8] See Michael Pierse, Writing Ireland’s Working Class: Dublin After O’Casey (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011), pp.45-6.

[9] Joelle Jackson, ‘How the Homework of 1930s Irish Schoolchildren Invites Folklore Studies Participation Today’, Folklife Magazine, August 17, 2021. Available online here.

[10] Patricia Lynch, The Turf Cutter’s Donkey Kicks Up His Heels (London: J. M. Dent and Sons, 1946, reprinted 1951), p. 170. All references are to this edition.

[11] Patricia Lynch, The Grey Goose of Kilnevin (London: J. M. Dent and Sons, 1939), pp. 282-3.

[12] It should be said that ‘lorries’ weren’t always motorized in the 1930s. In the fourth book in the turf-cutter’s donkey series, Long Ears, the circus lorries are drawn by horses, which makes it all the more striking that the circus lorries in The Turf-Cutter’s Donkey Kicks Up His Heels are driven by steam; this identifies them as traction engines, which were expensive items of machinery even by 1939, when they were no longer being built.

[13] The cottage as a rural utopia is celebrated in a poem in Lynch’s second Turf-Cutter’s Donkey book, The Turf-Cutter’s Donkey Goes Visiting: The Story of an Irish Holiday (London: J. M. Dent and Sons, 1935, reprinted 1947). The third stanza runs as follows:

The roads of the world pass its door,
The roads of the world lead to it.
Those who go long to return,
Those who stay have no regrets.
Beneath its roof youth is a song,
Age a happy dream.
Love built it: Love keeps it.

[14] See Terence Brown, Ireland: A Social and Cultural History, 1922-2002 (London: Harper Perennial, 2004), Chapter 5, ‘The 1930s: A Self-Sufficient Ireland?’, pp. 131-3.

[15] See Terence Brown’s discussion of the enduring ‘myth of Ireland’s assimilative capacities’, Ireland: A Social and Cultural History, p. 45, where he quotes Douglas Hyde’s speech to the National Literary Society in Dublin, 25 November, 1892: ‘Dane and Norman drawn to the kindly Irish breast issued forth in a generation or two fully Irishized’.

[16] See Patricia Lynch, The Turf-Cutter’s Donkey (London: J. M. Dent and Sons, 1934, reprinted 1940), pp. 173-6, and The Turf-Cutter’s Donkey Goes Visiting, pp. 37-41.

[17] José Lanters, ‘The “Tinker” Figure in the Children’s Fiction of Patricia Lynch’, ABEI Journal: The Brazilian Journal of Irish Studies, Vol. 7 (2005), pp. 151-162. This can be found online here.

[18] See Lynch, The Grey Goose of Kilnevin, Chapter X, ‘They Meet the Apple Woman’, and A Story Teller’s Childhood, p. 1.

[19] Jonathan Rosenbaum, ‘In Search of the American Uncle’, Jonathan Rosenbaum blog, September 5, 2024. You can find it here.

[20] On immigration from rural Ireland from the 1930s onwards see Terence Brown, Ireland: A Social and Cultural History, Chapter 6, ‘“The Emergency”: A Watershed’, pp. 171-6. Lynch’s A Storyteller’s Childhood is full of references to young Irish emigrants whose departure leaves the nation depleted. As the old storyteller Mrs Hennessy tells the protagonist, ‘I do be sick an’ sorry to see the young people flying away. They’re all goin’ an’ none comin’ back!’ (p. 91).

The History of the Little Toy Soldier (1971)

[I wrote this story in 1971, when I was eight years old. At the time I was at boarding school in Sussex, so the situation of the toy soldier – who falls out of a window and finds himself alone and far from home – echoes mine. My arrival at the school at the age of seven, from suburban south London, came as a revelation; first because it marked the moment in my life when I was suddenly cut off from my family (apart from my older brother, separated from me by the abyss of one year’s difference in age), and second because the school was in the English countryside, a place I’d never really seen before. Here everything was strange and fascinating, from the beetles in the grass and the skimmers on the surface of the ponds to what I called the ‘barb wire fences’, which enclosed herds of giant parti-coloured animals, wet-nosed and gentle-eyed. I liked to hang from a barb wire fence and bend a living tree branch towards a cow to let it browse on the leaves, proud of my courage in coming so close to such powerful entities. The school grounds seemed vast, a continent containing wonders, such as the derelict swimming pool that had now turned into a marsh as big as an ocean, hidden among twisting rhododendrons and towering pines and bordered by overgrown footpaths at the edges of which lurked pheasants ready to spring out suddenly from under your feet with a bugling shriek that would stop your heart. Like the soldier I wandered through this landscape in search of adventures, friends, and creepy crawlies, and found them all in ample measure, along with the aching homesickness that came to me every night as it came to him.

I had played with toy soldiers at home, of course, but they were made of plastic, not wood. The soldier’s woodenness is lifted from my favourite story at the time, Ursula Moray Williams’s The Little Wooden Horse, which is also echoed in the episode where the soldier swims across the ocean. The opening comes straight from Hans Christian Andersen’s The Steadfast Tin Soldier, though I was determined to give my hero a happy ending – that was my reason for writing it, I think. The Wind in the Willows and The Tale of Mrs Tiggy Winkle can be found here too, as can the verse of Edward Lear, who was responsible for my tendency to use ‘quoth’ in most of my poems. I don’t know where I got the idea for calling the whole thing a ‘history’, but I remember it felt very grown up at the time.

As I wrote, I knew I was writing a story for children, being convinced that a child could do this best; this is why I used the diminutive so often (I thought of the reader as younger than me) and included careful instructions on how to safely cross the road. The Little Toy Soldier was by no means the first story I wrote; I had scrawled others in similar school exercise books, and liked to provide a list of my ‘works’ on the back cover, as well as dividing them up into chapters with proper headings and pagination so I could put a list of contents at the beginning. Signing my name R. W. Maslen was probably inspired by the names C. S. Lewis and J. R. R. Tolkien, my other heroes besides Moray Williams. Books mattered to me more than anything else, except perhaps the toys I used to act out my own fantasies, and I lived in hope of finding a book with the glorious title of The Bodley Head, unaware that this was the name of the company that published two of the Narnia books in hardback. The ultimate Lost Book, I guess.

A few things are worth mentioning before you start reading. I didn’t know the words for certain things, so substituted the nearest equivalent I was aware of: so the soldier’s epaulettes became a row of medals on each shoulder, his plume became a ‘feather’, and for lack of the word ‘tarmac’ I had to say the road he fell asleep on was ‘cobbled’. I also remember being dissatisfied by the claim that a toy could have stopped a truck by rolling under its wheels; but the plot required some sort of heroic act, and this was the one I came up with. It’s funny how the things you remember most clearly, even at this distance of time, are the things you’re not satisfied with.

Here, then, is a window into the world of a small boy in the early seventies. I’ve been drawing pictures for it as a way of practising the craft of illustration. I hope to add more in coming weeks, and will let you know on social media when a new one comes along!]

THE HISTORY OF – THE LITTLE TOY SOLDIER

by R. W. Maslen

IN THE BEGINNING. 1

A little boy was playing with his toy soldiers one day. they were all lined up along the window-sill. The leader was the best of them all, for he had Medals lined along his shoulders, a beautifull black busby and a little feather in the middle. He had a beautiful Red coat as well.

as the boy played it got rather stuffy so he opened the window. he went on playing when by mistake his elbow knocked the cheif over. He rolled over and over till eventually a ghastly thing happened! he rolled right out of the window! Poor little soldier fell what he thought was miles, and very soon he landed with a soft thud on the grass wich lay proped up against the window.

He sat there dazed in a sort of dream for a while till he had recovered slightly from his shock. “oh dear,” he thought. “how on earth shall I get all that way up to my master? oh, well. I had better look on it as luck, for how could I learn anything up there about the world about?” so saying he got to his feet and started walking into a world unknown for human being’s.

***

He walked till his little wooden legs could carry him no longer and then he sat and thought for a longer time than he had known anyone could think for, about the world outside.

 

  1. THE LITTLE SOLDIERS FREINDS.

“I must have thought myself to sleep,” said the little soldier, shaking his little head and looking round. “Now I must find some freinds for it would not do to have every one your enemy – oh no!” so he got up from the stone he had been sitting on and looked round.

Soon he caught sight of a hedgehog busily polishing a nutshell. “Pretty shell,” remarked our soldier timidley for he had never seen a hedgehog before. “yes isnt it. its to keep the milk in for my babys!” said the dame, looking pleased as all mothers do when somone has remarked something of theirs is pretty. “excuse me,” said our soldier: “but will you be my friend?” the hedgehog looked surprised.

“why certainly,” she replied. “why should I want to be your enemy, after all?” So they both made a solemn vow that they should stay freinds for ever. They’re parting was rather unhappy, for the little soldier had been telling of his army and been growing prouder and prouder when suddenly he had found himself saying “well I’ll have to be going now.” and saying goodbye and there he was, walking away thinking about anything else but his freind.

he was thinking so deeply that he did not hear the rattle and clatter of a stream in front of him. by the time he looked up it was to late. he tumbled head first into the middle of the stream. He bobbed up and down for a bit, spluttering and Gulping as he went, until he hit something hard. he looked up and saw it was a little bit of driftwood going up-stream with the current. the little wooden soldier climbed up on to it and sank down into a deep sleep on top of it.

  1. THE LITTLE TOY SWIMS THE OCEAN

When the little soldier woke up he did not know where he was. The sun was shining on his face and there was water all around him. “Now I shall die,” he thought. “After all what could one do, out here, stranded on this bit of wood?” so saying he looked around himself again.

Suddenly he saw far away, the faint glimpse of land. As soon as he sighted it he plunged into the water, little knowing that it was only one of natures cruel Mirages. He swam and swam in that direction. as he did the land came nearer, only to disapear as soon as he thought he was on it’s beaches. “Oh, no, now I really will die!” cried poor little soldier. “Out here, all alone, in the middle of the long stretching Ocean!” But he would not give up yet – not he! He braced himself and started swimming with all his might. He swam, it seemed to him, for hours on end, nonstop. He was so faged out, and yet his little wooden legs still went on going. Strange hazes lifted and fell over the sea. He could no longer feel his legs and arms and yet they went on going. He did not even notice that his paint was slowly losing coulor. He only could see hazy blue, red, green, purple, yellow all the colours of the rainbow in mixed mists, as the sun sank low over the horizon. His eyelids suddenly shut and he fell asleep.

***

A little old woman was sitting on a deck-chair, in the sun. she was on the beach, looking out to sea. Suddenly she saw a little peice of wood on the beach. “That looks as if its Got signs of paint on it!” She said to herself. “I’ll go over and have a look at it.” So she got up off her deckchair and hobbled over to the fragmant. “Ah,” She thought. “It is a toy Soldier! My son would be pleased with this!” So she picked it up and took him to her house. The woman soon came to a neat little cottage with windows deeply set into its walls.

  1. THE WOMANS SON

As they came into the cottages back yard a dog barked. “Shut up!” Said the old woman shoving a bowl of dog-food under its mouth. toy soldier shivered. It was not the first time he had met a dog and he knew that they play with toy soldiers rather roughly! At first sight of the inside of the hut our hero knew that the boy must be very riatous if you see what I mean. The hall had lots of broken toys lying strewn about it. Soldier shuddered to think that he might become one too, one day.

he shuddered even more to think he would belong to the boy who came galloping down the stairs at the end of the hall!

So, to cheer himself up about it he made up a poem. It went like this: –

***

THE LITTLE SOLDIERS SONG

“How?” quoth the little soldier,
“do I come to be;
in this masters boyhoods
noisy liberty?”

“why?” quoth the little soldier,
“do I have to make do?
Oh! I suppose I really have to
as these toys did too.

“Besides,” quoth the little soldier,
“I’m a soldier to,
and little toy soldiers
simply have to make do!”

***

The little toy soldier by this time was being carried up to a little nursery at the very far end of the cottage. It wasn’t at all a pleasant sight! There was a little stained glass window at the far end of the room looking out onto a pretty little garden with pretty white, red and pink and yellew flowers growing in neatly cut earth beds. at the far end of the garden was a little shed with its doors slightly open. Through them you could see a battered looking tricycle, a few tins and a few rakes and shovels in the far corner. This made the little soldier very homesick – not exactly for his freind the master, but for his home-land. “And now,” Sobbed the toy soldier. “I will never get back! ever!” Suddenly he made up his mind. “I’m going to run away tonight!” he thought to himself. and in the next chapter you will see how he did.

  1. THE ESCAPE

At last after a few ours the little boy was put to bed. The bad thing was that the boy slept in the nursery! Well, about midnight the little toy got up and crept to the door. Imediatly all the broken toys let up a shout. “THE SOLDIERS ESCAPING!” They screamed as if their lives depended on it. At this the little toy soldier was extremly frightened And made a dash for the door. The boy had rose sleepily from his bed but as soon as he saw our soldier he was on his feet. But as he was so tired he could not run as fast as he meant to. He stumbled after the soldier who by now had reached the stairs at the end of the hall. He bounded down them and flew down the great room. Soon he reached the door but the boy was still hot on his trail! The toy threw open the door and ran up, but the gate out into the world lay locked against him. Yet he had’nt a moment to lose! he reached them but he had not the time to climb over them! He scrambled under the spikes of it quicker than the fastest racehorse. And now he had the Whole countryside before him. he started making his way through the tall meadow grass as quickly as possible but he need not have been so quick for the ugly boy behind him made no attempt to unlock the closed gate but went back sulkily into the house.

  1. LITTLE SOLDIER SAVES A LIFE.

The little wooden soldier sought rest long but he had to get to his home before evening or he would be completely lost. Although after escaping from the old womans cottage he was very tired, he still groped his way through the grass. It was daytime now, as you have picked up from the last few sentences and the birds were twittering joyfuly in the green birch wood wich rose up in front of the little toy soldier. But he had no thought for all this now – he only thought of sleep.

Soon he came to a long cobbled road and in the middle of it he sank into a deep sleep.

***

As he slept a little girl came skipping down the narrow pavemant wich stretched the length of the road. She looked up and saw the little soldier. She folded up her skipping-rope and stared in amazement. “How could a toy soldier have got there?” She thought to herself. “I had better pick it up or it would get spoiled!” Not looking left or right or right again she walked over the road to where the soldier was lying, and, while she was doing so, a lorry came roaring up the road! Little soldier leapt to his feet and rolled under the lorries rolling wheels. So doing, he stoped the lorrie long eneough as to let the girl run back to safety. But in doing so his little bodie broke in two and the lorry drove on! so the little girl went over to him (this time being more careful) and mended him. As soon as he found he was mended the soldier leapt to his feet and ran of leaving the startled girl behind him.

DANGER! 7/

He ran and ran and ran until he had at last flopped down to the ground to rest. As he lay there he now had a chance to look around. “Gosh!” he thought to himself. “what huge creatures!” (The huge creatures as he called them were really cows.). He got up. all around him was grass And the fence wich he had got under was realy part of a long barb-wire enclosure that ran all the way round the feild he was in. As for the feild itself it was like a world of lazziness excepting the little calfs wich romped about a few yards away. The older cows strolled about chomping grass wich they had pulled up slowly by the roots. Their tails were swishing up and down and now and then a bull snorted. But there was one bull wich thought of more than snorting! He thought of a charge at the little toy soldier! “Oh dear!” thought soldier. “I wonder how fast those creatures kill you? I hope they kill you quickly!” But he had already thought of one thing – and that thing was run! He got up, although his little wooden muscles ached and braced himself for the escape. The bull was already charging, in a few seconds the whole herd of cows would be after him! At last the soldier started to run. As he was young and not as clumsy as the bulls he ran much more faster than them. In fact he ran a bit to fast! He could not stop! He ran on and on, under the fence, up the hill, round and round again on the top and at last he flopped to the ground and forgeting that the fence was made of barb wire and the bulls could not get under it he thought he would be killed. But before long he was fast asleep in his own dreamworld again.

LITTLE SOLDIER GOES HOME. 8/

A beautiful doe with her fawn came upon a little sleeping figure lying in the bracken a few miles away from a feild with a few bulls snorting with anger and their wives. The little dappled fawn sniffed inquisitively at what turned out to be a toy soldier. Its mother nuzzled it gently so that it had to move away. Suddenly the little thing moved and both the deer bounded away through the bracken in a flash. Just then a little hedgehog came scampering along and stared surprisedly at the little toy soldier who now was sitting up with his back against a tree. Suddenly they both recognized each other – the two freinds who had met so long ago! There was great rejoicing between the two of them as soon as they knew they were the friends and little toy soldier was forced to tell his story again and again. very soon the couple of them went trotting through the undergrowth – a very happy pair!

***

By night at last they came to the little broock where so many adventures had first met the little toy. they had a little feast of gooseberry wine in the hedgehogs house and the little soldier met a few of her friends – the mole, the water-rat and the tortoise. The water-rat rowed them safely over to the other side in his little boat and they stayed the rest of their lives in his house – and they may still be there now!

THE END

Ursula Moray Williams, Adventures of the Little Wooden Horse (1938)

This was my favourite book when I was eight years old. I know exactly what age I was when I first read it, because I wrote a book of my own that year – The History of the Little Toy Soldier, by R. W. Maslen (as I signed myself then) – and the teacher who commented on it put the date at the end in his beautiful italic hand: 23.3.71. The Little Toy Soldier is a fusion of Hans Christian Andersen’s The Steadfast Tin Soldier and Moray Williams’s novel. The protagonist is made of wood, not tin, and swims the ocean just as Moray Williams’s horse does, losing much of his paint in the process, and many of his other adventures have close parallels with those of his distinguished predecessor. Like Moray Williams’s, my book has a happy ending; this was, in fact, the reason I wrote it. I had been outraged by the dismal fate of Andersen’s toy, and fusing the steadfast tin soldier with the little wooden horse was the perfect way to give him the Happily Ever After I felt he deserved. More interestingly, at least to me, it testifies to the tastes of a middle-class eight-year-old boy at the beginning of the 1970s, when fantasy as a genre was just coming into existence, and when the map of it looked very different from the way it does now. The Little Wooden Horse was central to my imaginative map, and online reviews of this short novel suggest that my love of it was shared by many other readers, and may even have shaped their reading and writing practices as it shaped mine.

The Little Wooden Horse is by no means a Lost Book, at least in Britain. It has been in print since it was first published, and my Puffin edition, reissued in 1963, says it is ‘already fairly established as one of the classic children’s books of this century’. But friends of mine in the United States – people with an intimate knowledge of fantasy for children – have never heard of it, though it had an early American edition. Some of them may have noticed that it’s mentioned in Michael Levy and Farah Mendlesohn’s seminal book on Children’s Fantasy Literature, but there it is described somewhat dismissively as a typical example of a theme that was well established in Britain between the wars, that of the toy-as-servant, the toy that lives only for the sake of serving its owner. The little wooden horse, say Levy and Mendlesohn, is ‘humble and unctuous’, and its servility makes the narrative ‘reminiscent of earlier, nineteenth-century fantasies’.[1] That’s one way of reading it, certainly, though it doesn’t fit the template of nineteenth-century children’s fantasy they provide in their chapter on the subject, which makes a strong case for the Victorian fantastic as deeply embedded in ‘house-based action’, that is, action contained within the limits of the domestic household;[2] the little wooden horse, by contrast, goes on extensive travels before returning to his master. The notion of the toy as an unctuous servant doesn’t work for me either. The wooden horse’s ‘master’ is a poor toymaker with no other servants – not even a real live horse, whose role the wooden horse takes on by carrying the toymaker’s wares from town to town so the old man doesn’t have to carry them himself. Moreover, the wooden horse leaves home because his master has fallen ill, implicitly through poverty; and when you’re roving from job to job in search of employment to save the life of a sick dependent, I’m not sure politeness and obedience can be classified as ‘unctuousness’. I do know that when I read Moray Williams’s book at eight years old it made me cry, and that it stuck in my mind as no other book did at the time (except Edward Lear’s Nonsense Omnibus, but that’s another story). I don’t think I’d have fallen so hard for a mid-twentieth century version of Dickens’s unctuously servile Uriah Heep. I remember that there was a distinctive emotional atmosphere about this story that lifted it out of the ordinary, one that I never found again except in some of Moray Williams’s other books, such as Gobbolino the Witch’s Cat (1942) and The Three Toymakers (1946). In tribute to that atmosphere, and to the deep impression the book made on me, I’d like to consider what makes Adventures of the Little Wooden Horse exceptional among offerings for young readers.

First edition, illustrated by Joyce Lankester Brisley.

Moray Williams’s book is itself a fusion of earlier classics, from the stories about animated objects told by Andersen in his many fairy tales (1835-1874) to the original horse story, Anna Sewell’s Black Beauty (1877), and the adventures of the wooden puppet Pinocchio, introduced to the world by Carlo Collodi in 1883. It has a simple plot, as Kaye Webb points out in her blurb, in which a wooden horse with wheels is made by an old toymaker who then loses his business to mass-produced toys made of tin and china and so falls on hard times. The wooden horse, who works for the toymaker because he loves him, decides he must make some money for his ailing master, and sets out on his titular adventures. These take him from one side of a nameless ocean to the other and through every walk of life, where he encounters kindness, cruelty, thoughtlessness, affection, greed and many dangers, before making his way back to the toymaker carrying a fortune in his little wooden body. If that plot sounds episodic, it is; but the episodes are so cleverly woven together, the adventures so harrowing, and the horse himself such a complex figure, that the effect is little short of epic. I read the Penguin edition of The Odyssey not long after reading Moray Williams’s book, and I now think I may have been led from one to the other by affinities between them.

The little wooden horse is complex, not so much because of his character – he is, as he often repeats in a kind of chorus, ‘a quiet little horse’ who would rather stay at home than seek his fortune[3] – as because of his nature, and the various ways the people he meets respond to it. What exactly is he? A toy? A horse? A person? He can talk like a human being, and is often treated by adults as though he had the human right to be paid for his labour. He has wooden wheels mounted on a platform to which his legs are attached, which makes him a toy, but he can also jump, kick, gallop and swim as well as any horse – though sometimes with unforeseen effects on his wooden body. Sometimes he finds work as a toy – as when a harassed father employs him as a plaything for his many unruly children – and sometimes as a working animal, for instance when he pulls a barge along a canal or joins a group of pit ponies hauling coal in a mine; his size, then, seems to fluctuate along with his identity. He can be broken and mended like any other wooden object, but he also feels pain, which is a quality seldom found in objects.[4] The wooden horse’s versatility resembles that of a child’s imagination, which can slot the same toy into a range of different adventures, but some of the adventures he embarks on are based on a knowledge of working conditions well beyond the scope of most young children.

Cover illustration by Pauline Baynes.

The multiplicity of the wooden horse’s identity means he is subject to the sort of double vision we apply to puppets, as explained by Steve Tillis in the following passage:

the puppet is a theatrical figure, perceived by an audience to be an object, that is given design, movement, and frequently, speech, so that it fulfils the audience’s desire to imagine it as having life; by creating a double-vision of perception and imagination, the puppet pleasurably challenges the audience’s understanding of the relationship between objects and life.[5]

But the Little Wooden Horse is not a theatrical figure, which means that certain abilities he has need to be visualised by the reader rather than staged; and some of those abilities are hard to visualise. How do you gallop when you’re mounted on a platform with wooden wheels? How do you unscrew your own head to put coins in your wooden body for safekeeping? How do you balance on a circus tightrope when you have four wheels, one at each corner of the platform, rather than two wheels in alignment? When your head falls off, how do you go looking for it when you have no eyes to look with? Moray Williams offers no explanation of how these actions are accomplished, which means that the wooden horse’s body seems to exist in a state of flux; your visualisation of it needs to be constantly adjusted to accommodate the needs of each new episode. The horse’s identity, too, is more multiple than can be accommodated by Tillis’s double vision. He is not merely both an object and a being endowed with life, but an object which is also an animal which is also (for certain purposes) a person – as well as being sometimes an adult person and sometimes a child. The work of the reader in imagining the little wooden horse is more complicated than the work of the theatre audience in imagining a puppet to be endowed with life. It requires a more active engagement with or involvement in the story, which may well explain why I chose to write a story of my own after reading the novel; by the time I had finished the last page, Moray Williams had given me a thorough apprenticeship in the challenges of imaginative creation.

Illustration by Peggy Fortnum.

His multiplicity makes the wooden horse rather hard to draw. Moray Williams’s book has been published with illustrations by many different hands, but to me the best are by Peggy Fortnum, who provided the pictures for the first Puffin edition. Fortnum is now best known as the first illustrator of the Paddington books, but her work for The Little Wooden Horse is even better, since it resolves the difficult question of how to picture a living object that can fulfil so many functions. Fortnum eschews the ‘clean line’ favoured by many children’s book illustrators, opting instead for a dynamic, rhythmic style which emphasizes action, and which is perfect for invoking the consequences of action too – the battering and dirtiness that comes from interacting with a rough environment. Fortnum often includes lines on the page which indicate the speed of the horse’s forward motion, or the swishing of his tail, or the lashing of wind and rain as he swims the ocean. She adds dots and more lines to many of her pictures to show the dust and stains accrued by the actions she is depicting. Her pictures are messy, which exactly suits a book which is deeply concerned with the messiness of the life into which its readers, like its protagonist, have been plunged.

Certain qualities of the horse remain stable through all his changes, above all the ones implicit in his name, which is not a name at all but a description. He is the Little Wooden Horse, not Ned or Atlas or Dobbin. That he is a wooden horse helps to make him epic – if you google the name you’ll mostly come up with the siege engine built by the Greeks to get into Troy – but it also ensures he’s always got both an equine quality and a woodenness about him – the woodenness making him as steadfast as Andersen’s toy soldier; he never wavers in his loyalty to his sick maker. He’s also little, and so always represented as smaller than other objects or beings he encounters – other toys, other horses, other people – no matter how his implied size may vary. His size does vary, since at one point he’s large enough to pull a carriage, at another small enough to be carried off by the youngest child in a family and dropped in a stream, but his littleness is always an integral part of him; the barge people, for instance, are astonished at his strength in relation to his size. He encounters other little people in his adventures: a little old woman who takes in Uncle Peder when he falls ill, a miner’s little boy who plays with him in the kitchen of a cottage, the youngest child who drops him in the stream, who is both an ‘honest little boy’ and a careless one (p. 108). Williams’s frequent use of the epithet ‘little’ in her book, above all in the incantatory repetitions of the protagonist’s name, underscores her commitment to the ‘little’ people who ensure things run as they should: from the bargemen and bargewomen who convey necessary articles from A to B to the miners who supply coal for industries and homes and the sailors who transport that coal across the ocean; from the women who run most households to the toymakers who supply goods for their children, and of course the children themselves, without whom any community will soon die out. The Little Wooden Horse is the epic of the little, its title suggests, to be appreciated by readers who have a proper respect for the value of small things.

Illustration by Peggy Fortnum.

(I met with some criticism for using the term ‘little’ too much in my homage to Williams’s novel, The Little Toy Soldier. My teacher said nice things about it, but urged me to make it shorter by ‘cutting out the “obvious” bits’. Above all, he wrote, ‘Avoid the adjectives “pretty”, “nice” and “little”’ – the last of which I used more often even than Moray Williams does. He had a point, of course, but the same rule doesn’t apply to all narratives, and Moray Williams’s book would be a very different affair – a diminished affair, I think – if it had not been so liberally sprinkled with ‘littles’.)

The little wooden horse’s horsiness is confirmed by the many horses he meets at each stage of his journey. Moray Williams and her twin sister Barbara were passionate riders – we’re told they started riding on home-made hobby horses before graduating to actual ponies – and Ursula went on writing about horses throughout her career (there’s a full list of her equestrian stories at this excellent website). The world of the wooden horse is driven by horses; they are its engine and the fuel that feeds it, from the snobbish rocking horse he meets in a nursery to the farmer’s horses alongside whom he works at harvest time, from the powerful barge horses ‘who made the little wooden horse look very small indeed’ to the lazy and jealous pit ponies who leave him to work by himself in a corner of the mine, from the team of kindly white horses which pulls the king’s carriage to the aggressive thoroughbreds at the royal racecourse and the big red hunter he meets at a blacksmith’s forge. Each horse he meets compares the Little Wooden Horse to themselves, often unfavourably, and he is forced to prove his equine credentials by beating them at their own respective games. The rocking horse dismisses him as too scratched and cheap to live in a wealthy household, but its judgment is overturned when its owner, a rich little girl, falls in love with him and asks him to commission an identical wooden horse from Uncle Peder. When he applies for a job with the farm horses the farmer first laughs at him ‘through his great black beard’, but soon stops laughing when he proves his worth by harnessing himself to the heaviest carts and pulling the biggest loads (p. 32). He proves himself as a barge horse, despite his size, by winning a race against the larger barge horses; confirms his worth as a pit pony by rescuing other ponies when a tunnel collapses; puts the whiteness of his painted body to good use when pulling the royal carriage as part of the colour-matched team; and shows himself a genuine racehorse by winning the Golden Trophy for his sponsor, the youngest of the ‘ten little Princes and Princesses’ in the royal family. The only time he fails to prove his worth is in his final horse-related adventure, when he finds himself swimming across the ocean in the company of a horde of angry sea horses, which ‘skimmed over the tops of the waves with such ease that the little wooden horse felt awkward beside them’. One of these ‘lovely little creatures’ demands contemptuously how he dare call himself a horse: ‘Look at you! Are you like a horse, I’d like to know?’ (p. 133); and the wooden horse replies by listing his credentials: he has two ears, two eyes, a mane, a tail, and ‘four strong wooden legs’ (p. 134). It’s the last of these attributes, ironically – the legs that for many readers will define a horse – that convinces the sea horses he is not one of them. ‘Whoever heard of a horse with legs?’ they scream, ‘Why, horses have fins!’ (p. 134). For the rest of this episode the ‘beautiful, wicked sea-horses’ seek to punish him for his temerity in calling himself a horse (p. 135), and he is only rescued by a helpful sailor who hauls him out of the water onto a ship – though the ship is sunk a short time later by the vengeful steeds of the sea, who are still trying to get at the wooden horse and dash him to pieces. The wooden horse manages to evade their attentions as the ship goes down, but his identity has never seemed so precarious. He has been judged and found wanting, at last, by creatures whose own physical form seems to run counter to most widely-accepted definitions of the equine.

Illustration by Peggy Fortnum.

The sea-horses, of course, are quite wrong in their judgement of the little wooden horse, since by this time in the story he has been accepted as authentically equine many times over. Indeed, the many kinds of horse our hero has met underlines an essential truth about equinicity: that it comes in many shapes and sizes, each with its own particular qualities. Even the donkeys the wooden horse finds on a foreign beach are clearly his kin, and he happily takes his place among them to work for a helpful old couple who mended him when he was broken, unconcerned as to whether or not donkeys and horses are (as the dictionary tells us) separate species. Moray Williams was writing, of course, at a time when the discourse of race had been violently thrown into the political foreground by the rise of Nazism; her little wooden horse, then, stands as a refutation of the Nazi doctrine of racial ‘purity’, and the sea horses serve as elegant illustrations of the absurd and toxic rhetoric that underpins it. If the little wooden horse’s identity exists in a state of constant flux, it fluctuates no more than any category or community we seek to define, and definitions themselves are useful only as contingent descriptors, not as zones designed to exclude, condemn or repress those who lie beyond their borders. This is the only conclusion the reader can reach after seeing the protagonist repeatedly dismissed as no horse only to be accepted as one a few pages later; not merely as a horse, in fact, but as the best of horses, whose qualities are worthy of being dispersed throughout society by the manufacture of further copies of our hero, each commissioned from Uncle Peder by a person who has been impressed by his courage, kindness, resilience and honesty. The wooden horse, in other words, is responsible for redefining horsiness all by himself, and offers hope that such positive redefinitions are possible, and can bring about improvements to a world that is rarely as kind or equitable as we might wish.

As crucial to the little wooden horse’s identity as his littleness and his horsiness is the fact that he’s made of wood; and this fact too remains central to the story from beginning to end. We are always being reminded of it, from the moment he’s made – when tears start to flow down his ‘newly painted cheeks’ (p. 11)  – to the final page, when Uncle Peder is busy carving replicas of him (‘wooden legs and wooden heads and wooden bodies’) and painting ‘red saddles and blue stripes on his new horses’ (p. 176), while their original sits quietly in the corner, going over his adventures in his head. The wooden horse’s woodenness makes him more subject to corporeal change than most living humans. Not only does he lose wheels, legs and even his head in the course of his adventures, but he is constantly changing appearance, losing his colours when Uncle Peder can no longer afford to repaint him, getting his wheels encrusted with mud when working at Farmer Max’s farm, turning black and shedding splinters as he labours in the mine, and worrying that if he changes too much Uncle Peder may no longer recognise him when they meet again. His woodenness also means he is not the exclusive work of one artificer. People are always repainting him and replacing his component parts, from the miner who carves new wheels for him with his pocket-knife to the blacksmith who makes him another set of new wheels ‘bound strongly with iron’ (p. 88), from the kind old shopkeeper who replaces a leg he broke in the circus to the donkey man and his wife who find his head and fix it onto his body. Other people ask if they can fix him – such as the ringmaster of the circus where he became a tightrope walker, or the father of the unruly children who pull off his head – but the wooden horse is choosy as to who takes a hand in his construction, unwilling (perhaps) to have his times of trauma built into his person, so to speak, in the form of a replacement limb. Nevertheless, by the end of the book the little wooden horse has become a collaborative artefact, his body assembled from parts and paint supplied by a succession of different makers, to the extent that he can be said to resist, by his continuing existence, the notions of exclusive property and elitist art. We’ll return to this later.

Illustration by Peggy Fortnum.

For all his woodenness and the collaborative nature of his construction, the little wooden horse retains a distinctive personality that could be said to haunt his increasingly battered and mended body like a ghost. We’re told that he has a hollow wooden body, well suited to containing things of all sorts, especially money; but when he gets anxious his heart beats somewhere inside it, ‘pit-a-pat! pit-a-pat!’ (pp. 18, 23, 38). His legs may be anchored to a wooden platform, yet they somehow contrive to work like a horse’s legs all the same: ‘the little wooden horse kicked his legs in the air, so that the four green wheels spun round and round’ (p. 12). When he is mistreated or damaged he gets ‘bruised’ (pp. 26, 139); when he runs a challenging race his ears buzz and ‘stars dance […] before his painted eyes’ (p. 80); when water fills him he fears he ‘shall drown’ (p. 114), and when he swims for a long time his legs begin to ache (p. 135). When he loses his head, a phantom head seems to go on thinking for him: ‘All thoughts of the money he was to have earned had gone out of his head’ (p. 109, my emphasis); and the hole left by the head’s absence puts his imaginary heart in jeopardy: when he hears an unexpected noise ‘His heart nearly jumped out of the hole in his neck’ (p. 110). The wooden horse retains his selfhood, it would appear, through sheer force of will and intensity of emotion, like Italo Calvino’s non-existent knight, who is really just an empty suit of armour with strong views about his duties as one of Charlemagne’s paladins.[6] It’s the wooden horse’s view of himself as a person, as against an object to be bought, sold, used and discarded, that carries him through his adventures, in the quite literal sense that it means he remains ‘him’ – the very same little wooden horse – despite all the changes he undergoes and the different perceptions of him with which he is confronted.

These perceptions are expressed through money: the money he thinks he’s worth; the money people will pay for him, or pay him for services rendered; the money withheld from him; the money he forgoes because it’s not worth the price he must pay for it; the money he loses or finds by chance. His travels are motivated by the quest for ready cash, and this makes the story typical of children’s stories of the pre-war period as diagnosed by Geoffrey Trease, many of which involve treasure hunts (The Midnight Folk, The Happy Mariners and The Hobbit are good examples).[7] But most treasure hunts are relatively straightforward. The process of finding the treasure is the point of the exercise, and the questions of what the treasure is, where it comes from, how it functions and what to do with it are not so important. This is not the case in Moray Williams’s novel, any more than it was in Tolkien’s The Hobbit, which appeared the year before, published by Moray Williams’s uncle Sir Stanley Unwin.[8] The little wooden horse wins his treasure many times over, but loses it again repeatedly, which is part of what makes his adventures so long and hard. When he gets trapped in the mine by a rockfall, ‘nearly all his wages’ fall out of his body as he struggles to free himself and his fellow workers from their underground prison (p. 57). Later, his pay from the circus falls out of the hole which was left when he breaks his leg falling from the tightrope; he only notices the loss when he feels ‘strangely light and empty’ the morning after (p. 98). Work-related injury, Moray Williams seems to be saying, drains a worker’s resources, effectively nullifying the value of any pay they may have received. While swimming the ocean, the wooden horse has to throw away most of his earnings to keep afloat, not to save his own life but that of a sailor who mistreated him (pp. 143-146). Finding treasure or earning money is depicted as a complicated business, subject to the vicissitudes of the market, the character and values of the worker and his employers, and the fluctuations of chance from day to day.

Illustration by Paul Howard.

The Little Wooden Horse, then, is not a simple treasure hunt, though in fact the wooden horse does find treasure on an island in the end, and it’s this treasure that he brings home to Uncle Peder. Even this treasure, however, needs to be earned by strenuous labour. The sailor gives it to him as payment for saving his life, which he accomplishes very nearly at the cost of his own, and certainly at the cost of all the pay he has accumulated before taking to the ocean. The process of getting the treasure is not so simple, either; it turns out that another sailor has a claim to it, and that this additional claim must be considered before the findings can be divided up. For an adult reader, this question of claims may in fact go further than Moray Williams takes it. The treasure has been hidden in a cave by some previous owner – perhaps a pirate; and the sailors who found it have the swashbuckling names of ‘Pirate Jacky’ and ‘Bill Blackpatch’, implying that they may have been involved in shady business at sea themselves. Whose treasure is it really, then – theirs, or the man’s who hid it, or the original owners’ from whom it was probably stolen? In Moray Williams’s novel, money is slippery, escaping from its containers through holes or crannies, getting lost in underground caves and discovered by strangers, or failing to be paid at all despite prior agreements. No one is its ultimate owner; rather, it resembles Bilbo’s Ring in The Lord of the Rings, an object that transfers itself from hand to hand for some devious purpose of its own, a purpose which is unknown to any of its holders, not even those who made it. Its deviousness and instability would have been deeply familiar to the book’s first readers in 1938, after more than a decade of financial crisis and economic Depression.

Money is also seductive, like Tolkien’s Ring. When the little wooden horse first sees the treasure, he responds with all the excitement of a dedicated buccaneer, enchanted by its sensuous beauty and rich abundance:

For all about the cave, in piles and heaps, in caskets, in crates, and in boxes, was such treasure as the little wooden horse had never dreamed of. Piles of golden coins, sparkling jewels, emeralds, pearls, rubies, diamonds – all flashing out of the darkness at the little wooden horse, winking at him with their sparkling eyes, saying, ‘Take us! Fill yourself with us! We are yours!’ (p. 149)

At this point in the narrative the treasure looks less like a reward for saving Pirate Jacky than a temptation to turn aside from his quest to save Uncle Peder. ‘We are yours’ (p. 149), the treasure declares, as if urging the wooden horse to consume it for his own exclusive benefit. The horse responds by loading his hollow body with precious objects:

the little wooden horse without more ado whipped off his head and scuttled round the golden heaps, picking here diamonds, there pearls, there golden coins, till his little body was filled to bursting-point, and he felt so rich he could hardly contain himself. How Uncle Peder’s eyes would pop out of his head at the sight of such a fortune! They would never be in want again! (p. 150)

Here the wooden horse whipping off his head becomes a prelude to yet another near loss of identity. By the time he is full he can ‘hardly contain himself’, which suggests he is on the verge of losing the selfhood he has struggled to preserve throughout his adventures, full of humility, kindness, resilience and concern for his elderly master. For once, he sees himself as surpassing rather than meeting Uncle Peder’s valuation of him; he anticipates the old man’s surprise at finding that his toy is now worth more than anything he has ever seen in his life. Teetering on a tightrope has nothing on this; the wooden horse has almost ceased to be the toy we have known and loved since the beginning of the book, and it’s only the appearance of the sailor Bill Blackpatch, who claims a share of the treasure he carries, that returns him to the values he has always cleaved to: values more stable and long-lasting than pearls or diamonds.

Illustration by Peggy Fortnum.

Elsewhere in the book the little wooden horse’s valuation of himself remains consistent, except on the odd occasion when he loses faith in his own appearance after a particularly damaging adventure. When Uncle Peder made him he judged him at once to be the best toy he had ever crafted, and set his price at exactly five shillings, more than he had ever charged for any of his wares. The villagers to whom he usually sold his toys were taken aback, and tried to convince him to sell the toy for less; but the old man stuck to his price: ‘You see,’ he explained, ‘I have never made such a fine little horse before’ (p. 11). This work of art, then, has a proper value in its maker’s mind, and Uncle Peder never wavers in his assessment of it, even when his customers stop buying his toys in favour of the cheaper toys mass-produced in city factories. In the end, of course, the horse brings him far more than his supposed value, not only in terms of the treasure he contains but also in terms of the many commissions for identical wooden horses with which he returns from his travels; many of the people he has worked for want an exact replica of the toy, person or horse they have fallen in love with, like the rich little girl in his first adventure. Uncle Peder’s integrity in demanding a just price for his labour is more than matched by the horse’s ability to generate income from his own labours; the book makes an economic case for valuing both work and its artefacts properly, and Moray Williams ensures that this principle gets extended – thanks to the horse’s adventures and the friends he accumulates – from the cottage of a miner to the palace of a king.

All the best people in the book never question the wooden horse’s value; he is worth five shillings exactly, no more, no less. The little rich girl to whom he tries to sell himself at the beginning refuses to buy him when she hears about Uncle Peder’s illness, and instead asks him to ask the toymaker to make her ‘a little wooden horse just like you, only quite new, and then my father will give him five shillings for it’ (p. 20). The King commissions ten little wooden horses at five shillings apiece, one for each of his ten little Princes and Princesses. The circus master offers five shillings for a replacement wooden horse to perform in the ring, the miner promises to pay ‘five shillings out of my wages’ for another horse for his son to play with, the kind shopkeeper asks him to send over a ‘dozen little horses like yourself […] and I will pay him five shillings for every one of them’ (though one wonders how much he planned to sell them for), and the father of the five unruly children commissions five ‘particularly strong’ wooden horses at five shillings a head (p. 176). When the barge people agree to carry the completed new wooden horses down the canal and see them safely stowed on a ship for delivery to the land across the ocean, the foundations are laid for a system of supply and demand which is very different from the alienated labour of the industrial revolution. Through the little wooden horse’s adventures, which he tells Uncle Peder in detail, a direct relationship is established between each purchaser of one or more new little wooden horses and the craftsman who constructs them. The solidity of this relationship is guaranteed by the fact that not one of the purchasers quibbles over the asking price; it remains the same at the end of the book as it was at the beginning, which gives the sum of five shillings the quality of a promise, something more stable and substantial than the promise printed on a five pound note to pay the bearer thereof on demand the sum of five pounds in gold. Britain had in fact formally abandoned the gold standard in 1931, which meant that the banknote promise could no longer be honoured. The little wooden horse standard, it would seem, is more reliable than the gold standard among those who are willing to accept it.

Illustration by Peggy Fortnum.

Despite this seeming consensus among the little wooden horse’s friends, his value is not universally accepted. The little rich girl’s fine large rocking horse sees him as an outdated artefact worth only grinding to powder beneath his rockers. The little old woman who takes in Uncle Peder sees the wooden horse as a useless thing left behind by some naughty children who have been hammering at her door (in fact the toy has been trying to gain access to his master). Three times she throws him away – once even flinging him over her cottage roof – and is just about to chop him to pieces when he finally decides to run off and seek his fortune. The sea-horses decide he is a ‘fox’ (p. 135), which is famous for not having anything of value to offer its hunters; its meat and skin are worthless. The sailor who rescues him from the sea-horses is told that the toy is useless to him, since he has no children; and Pirate Jacky, who claims him when the sailor disowns him, puts him away in his sea-chest as a trinket to be sold for pennies at the nearest market. For many of the people who meet him, then, the little wooden horse is not a person, nor even an animal; but several are forced to change their views when their circumstances change. The rocking horse must eat his words when his owner takes the wooden horse to her heart, and is later reduced himself to an outdated artefact, battered beyond recognition by mistreatment at the hands of some more unruly children, the little girl’s cousins. The little old woman changes her opinion when she marries the toymaker, and Pirate Jackie accepts the wooden horse’s personhood when the toy saves him from drowning. The little wooden horse, in other words, can prove his worth by his actions; but his actions alone don’t determine his value, as Moray Williams is careful to show at the beginning of the book, both in the different valuations of him by the girl and her rocking horse and in the challenges to his personhood posed by his very first adventure away from his master, when he goes to work for Farmer Max.

This episode involves a difficult negotiation concerning the little wooden horse’s status as a worker. On meeting some flesh-and-blood horses in a farmer’s field, the wooden horse learns that they earn money by their labour – or rather, that their masters earn money by their labour, since ‘what is money to us?’, the horses ask. The wooden horse, however, wants money ‘very badly’; so he queues up with the horses’ masters to sign a paper ‘agreeing to work for three days for Farmer Max and to accept the payment he offered them’ (p. 31). But his desire to sign the paper prompts general laughter, and when he applies for his wages after three days of graft the farmer asks him: ‘What does a little wooden horse want with money?’, seeking to confirm the farm horses’ view of him as an animal like themselves. It’s the masters of those farm horses who demand that Farmer Max pay the wooden horse, implicitly accepting the toy as an honorary human worker. From this point onwards, the wooden horse’s status as an honorary worker remains a given for much of the book; indeed, this status is one of the reasons the pit ponies hate him, since, as they complain, ‘We don’t get any money! […] We only get kicks and blows!’ (p. 53). But being a worker does not guarantee good wages, job security, or immunity from work-related injury. Farmer Max, for instance, tricks him into working for nothing, and chases after him when he escapes as if he were a runaway animal, incidentally causing him to lose his wages for pulling the barge. Later the wooden horse is injured several times, by a collapsed tunnel at the mine, a vindictive kick from a fellow racehorse, a fall from a circus tightrope and the ‘kicks and blows’ of the unruly children. The pay he gets for his work, too, varies considerably, depending on the wealth of his employer. The king, for instance, pays him gold for drawing his coach, the wealthy man who hires him as a plaything for his unruly children pays him in silver coins (p. 110), while the children who ride him on the beach pay only in pennies – though he gets a silver coin from the donkey man at the end of each day, ‘which is,’ Moray Williams tells us, ‘as much as he had earned from the circus master’ (p. 118). In the end, the little wooden horse gets paid more often than not, and duly earns his fortune in the end through his actions; but the difficulties, griefs and torments he has endured to get that fortune leave the reader under no illusion that this ending was inevitable. Besides, the fortune he eventually acquires is not the result of a conventional contract between employer and employee; it’s as much a matter of chance that Pirate Jacky has the wherewithal to reward him for saving his life as that he should have lost all his wages through a hole in his body after leaving the circus. The world of work is in effect made up of a series of adventures, if we take the term ‘adventure’ in the old sense of ‘chance’ or ‘luck’; and anyone living through the Depression would have been keenly aware that luck or chance – together with a proper recognition on the part of employers of the worth of labour – has more of a hand in getting gainful employment than any special diligence or skill on the part of the worker.

Illustration by Peggy Fortnum.

The little wooden horse’s relationship with money, then, is by no means straightforward. In early twentieth-century children’s fiction, the closest analogy to this relationship can be found in the works of Edith Nesbit and Noel Streatfeild, whose young characters learn through bitter experience how difficult it is to accumulate cash for the relief of their families. Unlike Nesbit’s or Streatfeild’s protagonists, however, Moray Williams’s hero is a work of art, having been made to the highest standards by a master craftsman; indeed, the term ‘master’ as applied to Uncle Peder may well be intended to remind us of the mastery that turned dead wood into a living creature. Moray Williams was herself a visual artist, having trained at the Winchester College of Art alongside her twin sister Barbara; she illustrated several of her own stories, most notably The Good Little Christmas Tree (1943), which is decorated with colourful double-page ‘scissor cuts’ throughout. The question of how an artist can make a living, then, would have been as important to her as it was to her contemporary, Mervyn Peake.[9] For her, works of art did not exist in the rarefied atmosphere of the art gallery or the wealthy private household, but in the busy world where properly remunerated work is as needful as it is hard to get; indeed, The Good Little Christmas Tree articulates the same philosophy, as its protagonist – another object brought alive by the writer-artist’s imagination – is forced to pay for its own decorations by giving up needles one by one till it’s almost bald (fortunately Santa Claus steps in at the last moment to put things right). The Little Wooden Horse seems to me more a story about labour and the value of labour than about servanthood, and duly sets the artist’s or master craftsman’s labour alongside the labour of the farmhand, bargewoman, miner, circus performer, blacksmith, shopkeeper and sailor as part of the same economic system of payment for services rendered.

Moray Williams’s book is itself a beautifully crafted artefact, above all in the construction of its plot. I said earlier that it could be seen as episodic, but each adventure builds logically on the one before, and the there-and-back-again trajectory of the wooden horse’s adventures ensures that each episode is revisited and satisfyingly concluded before the end. The little wooden horse keeps recalling his adventures in a series of reflective ‘choruses’ that always begin with his description of himself as a ‘quiet little horse’, counting and accounting for events as carefully as he counts the coins that go into his body. This draws attention to the structure of the narrative as a journey or odyssey through the British class system, in which the toy that began his travels as a nobody gains recognition for his qualities from a succession of strangers. The book, then, is an inverted Odyssey, since Odysseus was already famous for his exploits (which included devising the Trojan wooden horse) before posing as a man called Nobody to fool the Cyclops Polyphemus. Unlike the wily Greek adventurer, the little wooden horse remains a nobody to the end, and rejects the notion of heroic exclusivity in favour of the more anonymous achievement of having inspired many imitations in the form of new wooden horses, each calculated to improve the lives and luck of the community or household it enters.

Illustration by Peggy Fortnum.

The wooden horse’s adventures follow on from one another and recall one another with the elegance of a piece of music. His first employer, Farmer Max, for example, is directly responsible for the wooden horse’s achievement in beating the other barges in the race to the port, since his pursuit of the wooden horse on horseback stimulates the toy into running faster than any of his competitors. The barge pulled by the wooden horse contains props for a coalmine on the other side of the ocean, and he later finds himself working in that same coalmine. When he reaches the port he gets lifted onto a ship by a crane as a joke on the part of the sailors; he later demonstrates to a sailor that he is more than just a laughing stock by saving the man from drowning. The crane deposits him in the hold of the ship, where he meets a circus elephant with whom he soon makes friends; when next he meets the elephant he is lifted into the air for a second time by a kind of crane, which turns out to be the elephant’s trunk. After rescuing the pit ponies from the mine the wooden horse is taken in and mended by a miner’s little boy, who takes him to the city to see the King, the Queen and the ten little Princes and Princesses, about whom the toy had already heard from the elephant in the ship’s hold. In the city the wooden horse’s skill in pulling heavy vehicles, confirmed by the episode with the barge, is put to service again when he draws the royal carriage; and immediately afterwards his skill in running races is drawn upon for a second time when he runs a race on behalf of the littlest Princess. After his accident at the circus he is rescued again by the miner’s boy, whose father offers to mend him for a second time, an offer he refuses in his hurry to get home, which gives him a reason to seek assistance from an old toymaker who mends him in his shop, a counterpart of Uncle Peder. It’s in the shop that the wealthy man with unruly children spots him, leading to his appalling treatment at the hands of those children; more unruly children appear later when he revisits the rich little girl who fell in love with him near the beginning, because all her fancy toys have been broken by her boy cousins, including the haughty rocking horse who so despised him at the beginning. From the wealthy man’s house he travels to the beach at the edge of the ocean he needs to recross to find Uncle Peder, and here he foils an attempt by a piratical donkey man called Black Jake to steal a donkey from the kind donkey man and his wife, who gave the wooden horse shelter and employment as he waited for a ship to take him home. Later, on the island where he finds himself after rescuing Pirate Jacky, the wooden horse foils what he thinks is a second act of thievery, when he informs the sailor that another man, apparently his double, is trying to steal the treasure. When he meets the barge people for a second time after recrossing the ocean they remember to pay him what they owe him from pulling the barge to the port. Echoes weave through the story like musical themes, binding each part to all the others and establishing the act of remembrance or recollection – that is, of diligent accounting – as a key factor in any healthy personal or financial economy.

The little wooden horse’s last adventure involves yet another act of recollection or accounting. The owner of a horse that was to have drawn the wagonette for a wedding couple as they made their way to their new home claims he has not been paid enough for the job and takes his animal away; the wooden horse promptly volunteers to take its place, offering as his credentials for doing so the fact that he is ‘a strong little horse, and a quiet one’, and inwardly recalling ‘how he had helped to pull the King’s coach round and round the city’ (p. 172). The driver has already said that the married couple are poor, so the wooden horse knows he will not be paid for this act of kindness. This is the only job he has done, in fact, apart from rescuing the sailor, without some formal agreement that it will be remunerated (he earlier offered to work for the donkey-man who mended him for free, but the donkey-man insisted on paying him handsomely). For the wooden horse, working for the King for gold and working for a poor couple for nothing are effectively equivalent; the first makes him suited for the second; and he is duly rewarded for this egalitarian outlook by the discovery that the couple are none other than Uncle Peder and the little old woman. He learns this when he hears the old woman lamenting her mistreatment of him at the beginning of the book; and so his travels come full circle, and he finds himself living happily ever after, not in the palace – where he could easily have stayed – but in a cottage, which the story has made more attractive than any palace by the intensity of the little wooden horse’s yearning for it throughout his adventures.

Illustration by Peggy Fortnum.

In the cottage at the end of the book Uncle Peder institutes a new kind of economy, made possible by the treasure his toy has brought him. Thanks to that treasure the old man does not need to go on working, but he chooses to do so, and thereby links himself to the world the wooden horse has now explored. Uncle Peder fashions toys for all the children and adults who have requested them on both sides of the ocean, listing them carefully in his mind before he begins; and although he is presumably paid five shillings for each of these new wooden horses, he goes on to fashion additional toys for little or nothing. ‘Uncle Peder,’ Moray Williams tells us, ‘could now make toys to his heart’s content, but only for those children who pleased him, or for those who had none of their own’ (p. 176). The little wooden horse may not have triggered a revolution, but in a small way he has rocked the principles behind the capitalist system, since he has enabled an artist to work the rest of his life for the love of his craft and the love of children.

The little wooden horse has put his own special skills as a horse and a toy to generous use throughout his travels; for instance when he volunteered to run a race for the littlest Princess, who had no racehorse to run for her, or when he ‘took Pirate Jacky’s coat […] between his wooden teeth and began to swim with him’ (p. 143). He has also made his own stand against the principles of free market competition. When he catches the sailor trying to steal Pirate Jacky’s treasure he afterwards learns that the would-be thief is none other than Bill Blackpatch, who discovered the treasure with Pirate Jacky years before. Bill Blackpatch therefore has a good claim to half of it; but this does not stop both men getting into a fight over which of them should have the lot. Young readers in 1938 would have been thoroughly familiar with such fights on a larger scale; the Spanish Civil War had been going on for three years by the time the book appeared, Japan had gone to war with China the year before, and 1938 saw the invasion of Czechoslovakia by Hitler’s Germany. What these larger fights needed was a wooden horse to resolve them, and of course a willingness to accept a resolution. The wooden horse quickly settles the dispute between Pirate Jacky and Bill Blackpatch by proposing that they share the treasure between them, and the sailors have the good grace to agree to his ‘very sensible argument’, despite their piratical names (p. 156). Peace is restored, and the little wooden horse is permitted to travel on in Pirate Jacky’s boat towards his own special happy ending. Unfortunately the world in which Moray Williams lived did not do the same.

Nevertheless, in writing The Little Wooden Horse Moray Williams may have sown the seeds in some young readers’ hearts of a better settlement than the one they would shortly live through – the settlement reached through bloodshed at the close of the Second World War. Her little book remains well worth reading in our own times, when fascistic thinking is on the rise and we have great need of sensible arguments and friendship from strangers.

NOTES

[1] Michael Levy and Farah Mendlesohn, Children’s Fantasy Literature: An Introduction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016), p. 95.

[2] Levy and Mendlesohn, Children’s Fantasy Literature, p. 38. The phrase is Colin Manlove’s.

[3] See Ursula Moray Williams, Adventures of the Little Wooden Horse, Young Puffin (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1963), p. 11. All references are to this edition.

[4] Williams is a little inconsistent as to the wooden horse’s capacity for pain. When he breaks his leg in the circus we are told that ‘Fortunately, having only wooden legs, the little wooden horse was not in pain’ (p. 95); but earlier, when a little old women flings him into the forest, ‘his wooden body […] smarted and ached’ (p. 24), and when he’s chased by some delinquent sea horses in the ocean ‘His wooden legs ached; he could no longer feel his wheels, and longed to rest a little on the surface of the sea, till his breath returned’ (p. 135). His pain, I believe, depends on his state of mind.

[5] Steve Tillis, Toward an Aesthetics of the Puppet (New York etc.: Greenwood Pres, 1992), p. 65.

[6] See Italo Calvino, Our Ancestors, trans. Archibald Colquhoun (London: Pan Books, 1980), pp. 285-382.

[7] Levy and Mendlesohn, Children’s Fantasy Fiction, p. 99: ‘the treasure hunt […] Geoffrey Trease identified as one of the key tales of children’s fiction’; it ‘lacks the import of the quest’.

[8] The question of who owns or deserves the treasure stolen by Smaug is central, of course, to the last scenes of Tolkien’s novel. The treasure in The Midnight Folk is not so simple either, come to think of it; it belongs to the Church and people of Santa Barbara, a fictional country in South America, and its loss by the protagonist’s great-grandfather has left his spirit restless until it can be restored to its rightful owners. Perhaps treasure hunts in children’s fiction need more attention?

[9] Peake was born, like Moray Williams, in 1911.

Gerald Bullett, The Spanish Caravel (1927), reissued as The Happy Mariners (1935)

One of my favourite illustrations in The Hobbit (1937) is Tolkien’s drawing of the three trolls, Tom, Bill and Bert, hiding behind trees as a dwarf approaches the fire they have built in a wood.[1] The wood stands, we’re told, in a disreputable country not far from the Misty Mountains, to which policemen and map-makers never go and where people have never even heard the name of the king. This is the location of Bilbo’s first adventure after leaving home and the first time he acts as a burglar; he has been hired in this capacity to help steal back the treasure of the dwarves, stolen long before by a dragon. It is also the first time the dwarves let themselves get caught by one of their enemies. Bilbo’s expertise as a burglar steadily grows as the adventure continues after this episode. The dwarves, on the other hand, don’t seem to learn anything at all from this first experience of captivity. They get caught again in the Misty Mountains by goblins, in Mirkwood by spiders, and in Mirkwood a second time by their tetchy old foes the Wood-Elves. On one occasion they are even caught in exactly the same way as they were by the trolls: they see firelight in the distance, assume correctly that where there’s fire there’s food, and hurry towards it without taking the most basic precautions, letting their stomachs do their thinking for them. Confusticate and bebother these unteachable dwarves, as Bilbo might well have put it.

This first episode in the hobbit’s adventures – the meeting with the trolls – contains in miniature all the rest. It involves fire, woods, mountains (at a distance), meetings with dangerous creatures, a bit of magic, a good deal of trickery, and some shenanigans with pockets (Bilbo tries to pick a troll’s pocket and gets caught because the purse he lifts is able to talk; pockets or pocketses also play a central role in his later meeting with Gollum). It even involves treasure, since Bilbo and the Dwarves afterwards find the trolls’ cave, which is full of food, gold, unpleasant smells and some useful swords. With the swords is the long, keen knife Bilbo christens ‘Sting’, which he uses to rescue the dwarves when they are caught by giant spiders in Mirkwood. In that later rescue he copies Gandalf’s trick of enraging his enemies with his voice while keeping himself hidden, which suggests again that the hobbit learns from his adventures. Thanks to his growing knowledge, Bilbo grows in stature as the novel progresses, reflecting the growing confidence of the novice reader who follows his journey to the Lonely Mountain (and back again, of course), as charted by Francis Spufford in The Child That Books Built.[2]

The illustration Tolkien drew for this adventure is dominated by trees: long boles in foreground and background, with a bright fire in the middle ground, slightly right of centre, from which smoke rises in baroque curls above stylised flames. There are very few branches visible; the trees are mostly shown as a cluster of trunks standing closely together. There are various items by the fire: the barrel from which the trolls have been serving out beer, a stone for sitting on (or is it a sack?), a jug, two bowls. In the foreground a dwarf with a hood approaches the fire. At least, Tolkien tells us in the text that the dwarves wore hoods, but this one wears something more like a hat as modelled by the dwarves in Disney’s Snow White (1937), which wasn’t released in the UK until 1938, the year after The Hobbit was first published.

From behind the tree trunks in the background three trolls peer out; they have prominent eyes and pointed ears set high on their heads, like the eyes and ears of cats. I remember thinking as a child that the trolls didn’t look much like the way I’d imagined them; too slim, their heads too large in proportion to their bodies, and the text never mentions those pointed ears.[3] The trees, on the other hand, were wonderful. The ones in the foreground are drawn in broken and unbroken white lines against a black background, while the ones behind are textured with white dots on black, reversing the black dots on white with which Tolkien decorates the ground around the fire; this mixture of line-work with pointillism gives the drawing tremendous energy. Three of the trees have vines curling up them, neatly echoing the curls of smoke rising from the fire. I also liked the way Tolkien put a triple border round the picture, just like an Edwardian picture frame, with the title displayed at the bottom as if on a plaque. This was something I tried to emulate in my own finished drawings at the age of seven or eight.

More recently I’ve been reading a novel for children by Gerald Bullett, The Spanish Caravel (1927), republished in 1935 as The Happy Mariners with illustrations by the celebrated artist and theatrical scholar C. Walter Hodges.[4] Bullett’s novel was well known in his lifetime; my 1956 edition tells me it had been reprinted three times, and the illustrations by Hodges are wonderful work, on a par with his much-loved illustrations for Elizabeth Goudge’s The Little White Horse (1946). These days any reader will find the book offensive for its representation of Pacific Islanders as a horde of ‘comic’ cannibals who speak a nonsense language; the fact that those islanders are clearly intended to parody British childhood fantasies of adventure in far-off places modelled on imperialist stories tailored to middle-class boys does nothing to soften the racism. But the novel is also full of passages of beautiful prose – something Bullett was well known for in his lifetime. And its central character, a ten-year-old girl called Elizabeth Robinson, could be considered a curious example of British male attitudes to girls just before the Equal Franchise Act of 1928 – better known as the Universal Franchise – which finally granted women the vote on the same terms as men in the United Kingdom. I’ll have more to say about this in a moment.

Most importantly for my purposes in this blog post, however, one of Hodges’s illustrations looks remarkably like Tolkien’s drawing of the trolls. This is a picture titled ‘Night in the Forest’, on p. 119 of my edition, almost exactly halfway through the book. The parallels are striking. First, the trees: long boles in the foreground and background, with a bright fire in the middle ground, once again slightly right of centre, from which smoke rises in billows and curls more naturalistically depicted than in Tolkien’s drawing. Once again there are very few branches visible, and the trees are standing close together, rising from the bottom to the top of the picture like the bars of a cage. People, not objects, are visible by the fire, one sitting, one lying half raised on their arms; it’s hard to tell which of the four children in Bullett’s book they represent. In foreground and background, occupying the place of Tolkien’s dwarf and three trolls, are the shapes of big cats: eight cats in all, counting the one that’s only visible thanks to its glowing eyes in the dense shadows at the left in the foreground. In Bullett’s text the creatures are not specifically cats but ‘beasts of prey’ (p. 117); Hodges has chosen to interpret them as feline, which is interesting considering the feline appearance of Tolkien’s trolls, with their pointed ears and large, glowing eyes so unlike the description in his narrative. Hodges’s picture, like Tolkien’s, is given texture by the juxtaposition of white on black and black on white, with black predominating throughout, as you might expect in a night scene. Like Tolkien’s, the picture is surrounded by a frame of three parallel lines, and like Tolkien’s its title is given underneath, inscribed on what looks like a brass plaque. So many parallels, it seemed to me when I first saw the picture, could hardly be a coincidence, and I’m inclined to believe that still, though I have little concrete evidence to back this up.

In theory, of course, Tolkien could have read The Happy Mariners, and his youngest son Christopher and daughter Priscilla were of an age to enjoy the edition illustrated by Hodges, which came out in the year when Christopher turned eleven and Priscilla turned six. Bullett’s child protagonists are twelve, twins of ten-and-a-half, and seven, which tallies nicely with the ages of Christopher and Priscilla, as does the fact that there are three boys and a girl in the fictional family, which matches the composition of Tolkien’s actual one. Beyond this, Bullett’s novel has little in common with The Hobbit, apart from the fact that it includes a meeting with anthropophagic people, that is, people who eat other people (though the trolls in The Hobbit are not strictly cannibals, since they are clearly identified as a different species from the beings they eat). There’s much more in it, however, that aligns with the fiction of C. S. Lewis, Tolkien’s best friend in the 1930s; again, I’ll have more to say about this later. Could Lewis, I wondered, have recommended the book to Tolkien, or vice versa? Sharing views on fiction, especially fiction with a fantastic aspect, was common practice among the Inklings, the informal literary circle that met at the Eagle and Child pub and elsewhere in Oxford throughout that decade, of which Lewis and Tolkien were the principal members.[5] Bullett is exactly the kind of writer who would have interested them, even if they might not have agreed with his ‘liberal socialist’ politics; he wrote Christian apologetics, among other things, and poetry of a slightly old-fashioned kind, the kind of which they might have approved. Moreover, one of the novels Bullett wrote in the 1930s was about Adam and Eve (Eden River, 1934), a mythic story Lewis took up nine years later in his second science fiction novel, Perelandra (1943); he might well have read Bullett’s story with attention. The Happy Mariners was another story that contained material potentially attractive to the Inklings, above all in its use of fantastic tropes and dreamscapes made real, as well as in its rich deployment of literary allusions.

In the opening chapter of Bullett’s book, the Robinson family is visited by a strange man who brings a gift for one of the children – Elizabeth – which turns out to be a ship in a bottle. The children take the ship to a pond in a brickfield (a site where bricks are made) and launch it in its glass container, then throw stones at the bottle to free the craft from bondage. As soon as the glass breaks the children find themselves at the edge of a high cliff, looking down on a full-scale version of the vessel floating in the sea beneath them. After managing to get on board, they learn that the ship is in fact a Spanish caravel which has been captured by a solitary English mariner, who wakes up after a sleep of three hundred and fifty years or so and helps them steer it across the ocean to an uninhabited island. The island closely resembles an island the children drew on a map at the beginning of the novel to provide a focus for their games. As they explore the place they find that all the details they included on the map are present, from a log cabin for shelter to a trail of footprints and a trove of buried treasure, which includes cake and a large stone sundial. Also present are some comic but threatening pirates and some comic but friendly Pacific Islanders, and the novel ends, after various adventures, with the defeat of the first and the bequeathal of the treasure to the second (with strict instructions to bury it again at a site of their choosing). The children then return home in the caravel. In the course of the journey the mariner who helped them sail it returns to his long sleep, and having got them safely home the ship returns to the size it was at the beginning of the story, ‘eight inches from prow to stern’ (p. 248). The novel, in other words, describes a there-and-back-again trajectory, which is the only other thing it has in common with The Hobbit.[6]

Bullett’s book holds many echoes of earlier fiction for children. The fact that there are four child protagonists – three boys and a girl – recalls the plural child protagonists of Edith Nesbit’s novels, and the magic that takes place in a claypit used for making bricks may remind us of the industrial sandpit in which Nesbit’s four children (not including the baby) discover the Psammead in Five Children and It (1902). Bullett’s frequent shifting of point-of-view between one child and another similarly recalls Five Children and It, as does the humorous tone of their frequent squabbling. The Elizabethan sailor awakened after long sleep recalls Nesbit’s rudely-awakened Psammead, a sand-fairy who grants the five children their wishes, all of which come true with awkward consequences unforeseen by the wisher; the sailor is much less grumpy than the sand-fairy, and the magic he and his ship unleash is less awkward in its effects, but the parallels are clear enough. The island, meanwhile, has much in common with the Neverland of J M Barrie’s novel Peter and Wendy (1911). Barrie tells us that the Neverland is based on the map of a child’s mind, which nearly always takes the shape of an island,

with astonishing splashes of colour here and there, and coral reefs and rakish-looking craft in the offing, and savages and lonely lairs, and gnomes who are mostly tailors, and caves through which a river runs, and princes with six elder brothers, and a hut fast going to decay, and one very small old lady with a hooked nose. (p. 73)[7]

The mixture of adventure story and fairy story in this description exactly matches Bullett’s ‘island of the map’. So too does the fact that Barrie’s Neverland has different contents depending on which child is dreaming it. ‘Of course the Neverlands vary a good deal’, Barrie tells us, so that John’s has a lagoon with flamingos flying over it, for instance, while Wendy’s has a ‘house of leaves deftly sewn together’ (p. 74). Bullett’s island, by contrast, is a response to the collective imaginations of the four children who drew the map on which it is based; but the different children each have specially tailored adventures on it. The youngest child, for instance, seven-year-old Martin, finds his way at night into a ‘Forest of Fairy Tales’ which none of the other children encounter (Chapter 14), though they get taken home in the end by a friendly cuckoo he met on this solitary adventure – remembered, perhaps, from Mrs Molesworth’s The Cuckoo Clock (1877). The island also contains elements from Stevenson’s Treasure Island (1881-1883), most obviously in the siege of the log cabin by pirates, which invokes the siege of the stockade in the earlier novel (the eldest child, Rex, ‘had just been reading Treasure Island’ before the book begins, p. 2). The footprints leading to the treasure recall the famous footprint in Robinson Crusoe (1719), a book which is also invoked by the children’s surname; and the attack on the pirates by the Pacific Islanders recalls a similar attack in R. M. Ballantyne’s The Coral Island (1857), as do the many lavish descriptions of tropical vegetation. All these echoes of earlier fiction for children must be deliberate, I think, and suggest that Bullett read the map of children’s minds as dominated by their reading, supplemented by conversations with adults, especially their businessman father. Even the Elizabethan sailor, Phineas Dyke, comes from an episode in British history much read about by British children in the age of imperialism: the defeat of the Spanish Armada in 1588. Phineas’s awakening from long sleep summons up the many characters from history brought back to life by the fairy Robin Goodfellow in Rudyard Kipling’s Puck of Pook’s Hill (1906) and its sequel, Rewards and Fairies (1910), to tell their stories to two British children, just as Phineas tells the story of his capture of the real Spanish caravel to Bullett’s child protagonists. The Happy Mariners reads in fact like a journey through a library; the kind of journey recounted by Walter de la Mare in his first novel, Henry Brocken (1904), which tells of its protagonist’s travels in the ‘Rich, Strange, Scarce-Imaginable Regions of Romance’.

The originality of Bullett’s story derives from its passages of rich description, a series of dreamy set pieces which mark it out as a novel written after the advent of Freudian psychoanalysis.[8] Each of these passages is sensually vivid, but also self-evidently unrealistic, full of details that can’t be explained by conventional logic. Here, for instance, is Elizabeth’s first impression of life on the ship:

She had known every inch of the ship so well when the ship was in its bottle that she was filled with astonishment at finding everything a thousand times bigger. Here was the half-deck, higher by four feet than the other; here, on their swivels, were the two guns (faulcons, as Father had called them); and here was the cook’s galley. All was exactly as her father had shown her, and as she herself had seen when, with the ship in her hand, she had studied and admired its every part. The beams of the deck were slippery; two or three times she nearly lost her footing, and once only saved herself from falling by clutching at a gigantic coil of rope, rope thicker than her arm in a coil as tall as herself. The great lantern that swung and swayed half-way up the mizzen mast held her attention for a wondering moment. How did it come there, and who had lit it? Perhaps Rex had found it in the course of his explorations. The question did not occupy her for long, for she was enraptured with the taste – the salt and tarry taste – of this adventure; the sight of stars moving overhead; the feeling of the ship, like a live thing, under her; the rhythm and music of the ploughed sea; the sound of the canvas that was like the beating wings of a gigantic bird. She felt that she, like a queen, was riding the ship, and that the ship was riding the sea, and that the sea itself, with its myriads of leaping waves, was racing round the world. Speed and air, music and starshine, were  mixed in one glorious cup for her. (p. 54)

The passage mingles accurate marine vocabulary – half-deck, faulcons, cook’s galley, beams and so on – with elements of arrant fantasy, such as the sudden growth of an eight-inch model of a ship into a craft ‘a thousand times bigger’, or the fact that a lantern is somehow burning on the ship’s mizzen mast without having been lit by anyone (though there may be a rationale for this – ‘Perhaps Rex had found it’). Elizabeth’s attempts to rationalise the lantern get quickly subsumed by her enjoyment of the sensory richness of her adventure; it has a ‘salt and tarry taste’, the stars look as though they are moving along with the ship, the ship’s movements make it feel ‘like a live thing, under her’, the sea sounds like music, while the flapping of the sails sounds like the wings of a giant bird – everything around her is endowed with life by each of her senses in turn and together. Her intense sensory awareness convinces her that she can feel the sea itself ‘racing round the world’ – which it may well be, though the ability to sense that world-encompassing motion could be regarded as a supernatural gift. The passage ends with the idea that all her senses together contribute to her general delight, the ‘glorious cup’ from which she is drinking. Delight trumps conventional logic, then, on Elizabeth’s maiden voyage, despite (or because of) the promise of imminent danger held by the faulcons on their swivels.

Part of the dreamlike aspect of this passage derives from the fact that it’s written from the perspective of a young girl of the 1920s. Elizabeth’s delight in the ship stems from a fascination with maritime adventure which makes itself felt in the careful study she has made of the model gifted to her by a kindly-eyed sailor. The model’s release from its glass bottle and expansion to full size enables Elizabeth to realise her dreams of adventure, a dream stimulated, it would seem, by the books she has read – the books I’ve listed, some of which are directly referenced in the text. All these books are directed at boy readers rather than girls, but Elizabeth finds a way of reading against the grain to incorporate details from those books into her games with her siblings. For instance, she’s the one who draws the outline of the island on the children’s map, after a first abortive attempt by her younger brother; she’s also the one who first and most vividly brings the ship to imaginative life: ‘In fancy she sailed under a copper sky down a broad river that ran through the dark and sleeping forest; she saw panthers gliding among the trees, and monkeys leaping from branch to branch pelting each other with coconuts, and scarlet parrots that started screaming at her ship’s approach’ (p. 16); and it’s from her imaginings that her male siblings get inspiration: ‘Her brothers […] caught fire from her eyes’ (p. 19). She’s the one who succeeds in breaking the bottle with a well-cast stone, ‘though it is notorious that girls can’t throw straight’ (p. 23), and thereby wins the captaincy of the craft inside; and she knows more about that craft than the other children (‘“You seem to know a lot about this ship,” said Rex, almost complainingly. “You haven’t been on her before, have you?”’, p. 35). By the time we read the paragraph I’ve just cited, Elizabeth is both captain and ‘queen’ of a captured warship, leading her siblings on a quest to an unknown island of their own invention. She’s in a position, in other words, which outside this book she could only dream of, and her delight in riding the ship around the world is intensified, one might guess, by the fact that she could never enjoy these experiences under ordinary, non-magical circumstances.

At the same time, however, Elizabeth is constantly being relegated in Bullett’s novel to roles traditionally assigned to women under patriarchy: looking after her younger brother, cooking in the ship’s galley, being sent below when a storm blows up at sea while her brothers help man the vessel, sewing clothes in the log cabin and so on. Yet she is steering the ship when the children first encounter the pirates, takes an active part in the defence of the log cabin during the siege, and befriends the chief of the Pacific Islanders, thereby saving herself and her siblings from the evil designs of the buccaneers. Elizabeth, in fact, is a kind of in-between figure, both capable of acquitting herself well in situations formerly reserved for boys, and unable to free herself from the narrow range of roles available to young girls in her lifetime, above all as future wives and mothers. Elizabeth’s delight in the ship shows her to be willing and eager to embrace roles far beyond this narrow range, but she sometimes accepts the limitations imposed by men, as embodied by her oldest brother. That brother’s name – Rex, which is Latin for king – seems to identify him as more ‘naturally’ worthy of a leadership role than she is, despite her own name’s connection to a woman who famously had the ‘heart and stomach of a king’; and when the children land on the island Elizabeth soon hands over the captaincy to Rex. She occupies a liminal position, neither equal with her brothers (despite the promise of equality held out by the Equal Franchise Act of 1928) nor willing to accept her unequal status.

It’s for this reason, perhaps, that Elizabeth often seems most aware of the rules that govern the ‘salt and tarry’ adventure in which the children find themselves caught up. For instance, when the model ship first changes size she suggests, ‘Perhaps […] it was a big ship all the time, really. But we couldn’t see it. It was in the bottle, and the bottle was magic’ (p. 51). Later, when they discover the log cabin on the island in exactly the place they put it on the map, she suspects at once that it came into being when they imagined it:

‘Why, it might have been built yesterday,’ said Guy, ‘by the look of it.’
‘Perhaps it was,’ said Elizabeth thoughtfully.
‘What on earth do you mean?’
Elizabeth shook her head. ‘I don’t know.’ (p. 139)

Later still, she thinks she understands how and why Phineas unexpectedly vanished from the island and reappeared on board the caravel:

‘He belongs to the ship, don’t you see? He’s lived on her for three hundred years. It’s his home, and he’s helpless and kind of lost anywhere else. That’s why he came back, I’m sure. He just forgot all about us and went back to his old ship without quite knowing what he was doing. Like people walking in their sleep.’ (p. 242)

Elizabeth’s in-between state, not bound to the rules of ‘realistic’ adventure stories as her older brother is (the younger boys abide by different rules, as we’ll see), makes her at ‘home’ on the ship and the island, as he is not. She rarely gets worried or frightened, as the boys do, and finds herself able to sympathize both with the wicked pirate chief when they pick him up at sea and with the chief of the Pacific ‘cannibals’ when she finds him injured outside the cabin; in fact, her willingness to set aside convention to make friends with the latter ensures that their adventure gets a happy ending. Thanks to her experiences as a girl in a society dominated by men, she is acutely conscious from the start that the children are engaged in events that have little to do with the rules of physics or social conventions – though those rules and conventions are always at work behind the scenes. In the end it seems clear that the whole adventure could not have happened without Elizabeth’s involvement, and in this she is closely related to Barrie’s Wendy, for whom Neverland and all its adventures are engineered by Peter Pan; though Elizabeth’s greater agency is reflected in the fact that she engineers the island for herself by sketching out its contours in the opening chapter. That the adventure is predominantly Elizabeth’s is also suggested by the fate of the pirate chief, who has his head cut off by Phineas in single combat on the deck of the caravel, but spouts only sawdust from his injuries, making it clear that he cannot feel them and so no longer needs Elizabeth’s sympathy (which she bestowed on him freely on his earlier visit to the vessel). The sawdust conveys the fact that the whole adventure was only ever a brief holiday from ‘real life’, and that this interval of play – when living and breathing human beings can be filled with sawdust like a child’s dolls – will soon be over, giving way once again to the world we call ‘real’. Of all the children, Elizabeth seems most aware of the evanescence of the adventure, since she has most to lose by its coming to an end. She’s the first to note, after the pirate chief’s beheading, that they will likely be home in time for tea (p. 246); but she is also the last to leave the island, lingering as long as she can to say goodbye to her friend the chief of the Pacific Islanders (pp. 236-7). Her in-betweenness persists to the novel’s final page.

Interestingly, the boys in the story too exist in an in-between state, caught both between childhood and adulthood and between conventionally ‘male’ and ‘female’ attributes. The eldest boy, Rex, is the most maddeningly masculine of the three, constantly seeking to assert his greater knowledge and strength over those of his siblings. He addresses his youngest brother, Martin, as ‘my lamb’ (p. 6), telling him that ‘When you’re a bit older’ he’ll learn to fear pirates as well as yearn for them. On one occasion he calls his other brother Guy ‘my little man’, like a tiresome adult, while ‘thrusting two hands mannishly into his trouser pockets’ and giving ‘a scornful laugh that was very impressive’ (pp. 17-18). At the same time, Rex is not yet wholly given over to the patriarchy, since he is willing to cede his ‘natural’ place as leader from time to time by consenting to the best ideas of his brothers and sister: ‘That was the pleasant thing about Rex,’ Bullett tells us; ‘even though he was the eldest he was never above taking suggestions from the others’ (p. 6). His genial compliance derives, no doubt, from his secure position as presumptive leader of the Robinson children.

The youngest boy, meanwhile – Martin – lives equally in his imagination and the material world, being wholly devoted to his older sister, his cat Fandy, and a broken cuckoo clock he treats as a toy. Unlike Rex he is not yet fully aware of the distinctions between his dreams and desires and the reason-based universe adults expect him to inhabit; and this is best exemplified by his solo adventure in the ‘Forest of Fairy-Tales’ to which he finds his way on the island, where he meets a dwarf who offers him three wishes in time-honoured fashion (pp. 152-4). Martin has just passed a beautiful orange tree in the forest, and wishes for that; at once he finds it growing next to him, and his next wish is to be able to take it away with him when he goes home. The dwarf suggests he carry it away in a pot, but Martin is horrified: ‘But it won’t be the same in a pot!’, he cries in distress. The dwarf then offers him the forest as well, to keep the tree in its ideal context; Martin agrees at once, and his second wish is duly granted. After this, Martin pauses to consider his final wish. He would like, he says, to eat the oranges, but also doesn’t want to ‘spoil the tree’ by plucking them. Unfortunately the dwarf ignores the second part of his wish and plucks all the fruit, after which ‘The tree was bare; the oranges lay scattered on the ground’, and Martin finds himself ‘on the verge of tears’, realising that the tree he loved no longer exists in the state that made him fall in love with it. Martin’s desires, he learns, are unattainable in the ‘real’ world, something that’s made clear to him through his inability to formulate his wishes satisfactorily (shades here, again, of Five Children and It). In recompense the dwarf offers him one more wish – forgetfulness – and Martin at once forgets the lesson; perhaps Bullett thinks him too young, as yet, to have learned it. The youngest Robinson goes on to have other fairy-tale adventures that night – in a snow-bound village where he meets the cuckoo from his broken cuckoo-clock and Cinderella – and he tells his siblings all about them when he gets home; but he never again mentions the vexed conundrum of the orange tree.

All the same, there are hints elsewhere in the text that Martin is fully aware at times of the disconnect between his desires and the ‘actual’ world he lives in. When the children first come aboard the life-size ship, Martin quickly learns he may not be much help in its handling. ‘I’ve got a feeling I’m not going to like this trip very much,’ he tells his sister. ‘I wanted to help with the ship, but they said I was too little’ (p. 59). Soon afterwards he adds, ‘I think it would be rather nice to go home. You could come too, couldn’t you? They don’t want girls here, you know. As Rex said, this is a man’s job’ (pp. 59-60). Martin is, in fact, the only one of the brothers who directly recognises the convention that makes Elizabeth an unusual member of a ship’s crew, and he does so because he finds himself in the same position; unlike the older boys he cannot pretend to be a man. It takes all of Elizabeth’s ingenuity to persuade him that they can’t go home in the ship’s boat, rapidly explaining that ‘it was impossible, that she couldn’t row, that it would spoil the fun, that she must stay with her brothers, and that Martin was going to have the time of his life on the Resmiranda’ (p. 60). If Martin, at his young age, is tied to convention, Elizabeth has the wherewithal, here as elsewhere, to find imaginative ways around it.

Rex, then, is almost a maddening sort of man and Martin is very definitely a child; but the middle brother, Guy, is more ambiguous in his role. First, he is Elizabeth’s twin, and very fond of his sister – something that Rex finds it necessary to tease him about from time to time (‘real’ men, in Rex’s opinion, don’t side with girls in every family disagreement). His relative plumpness makes him less suited to the ‘male’ life of high adventure; when he slides down the rope that leads from the cliff-top to the newly life-size ship, his weight causes the rope to break and he falls into the sea, which means he is forced to spend the first few hours on board without his clothes as he waits for them to dry; a humiliating situation for any would-be mariner. His position in the family between his brothers and between a child and an adult comes across most clearly in the adventure he has on his own, when he decides to leave the log cabin to spy out the land without consulting his siblings. This comes straight after Martin’s solitary adventure, and we’re told that Guy is the only one of Martin’s siblings to fully believe in his adventures in the Forest of Fairy Tales, since in Guy’s opinion

This island […] was not an ordinary island; it seemed to be a place where things you thought of had a queer trick of coming true when you least expected it. And not only things you thought of, but things you half-thought of, things you had forgotten, and perhaps – who could say? – things that lay buried inside you under all the other thoughts. (p. 178).

This makes it sound as though the island releases things from your Freudian unconscious (or ‘subconscious’, as Bullett calls it in his essay Dreaming); and sure enough, Guy feels the pull of the unconscious on his own solitary adventure, much as Martin did in his encounter with the dwarf. As he hurries towards the highest point on the island he abruptly feels a strange inclination to take a detour towards a nearby spot where his dreams might come true, like Martin’s:

As he came closer, a warm breath of intoxicating scent floated up into his face, and phrases of distant music stole upon his senses. The leaves of all the trees began to quiver and glow, as though little lamps had been lit inside them; and the whole forest seemed to be singing, murmuring. At any moment something strange and delightful might happen, for near him, within hand’s touch, he was aware of another world, a world both inside and outside the forest that he saw, the sea that he remembered, and the home that he had left so long (it seemed) ago; and he felt that some trifling happy chance – a step, a movement, the flicker of an eyelash, or a single word if only it were the right word – might release him into that world. (p. 179)

This enchantment of Guy’s has much in common with Elizabeth’s feeling of sensory pleasure on the ship; each of Guy’s senses is caught in turn by the ‘other world’ that seeks to draw him to itself, from smell (‘scent’) and sound (‘music’) to sight (the ‘little lamps’ of the leaves) and touch (hand’s touch) – only taste is missing. The accumulation of these sense impressions brings with it the potential for delight of the kind embraced by Elizabeth (‘something strange and delightful might happen’), but Guy has a mission and, as a boy, suspects that what tempts him to abandon it must be wrong, running counter to the values boys and men are supposed to embrace. He therefore resists delight as Elizabeth did not, hurrying past the place of enchantment towards the hilltop where he hopes to be able to see all round the island. A second time he is tempted – this time by the sudden realisation that the treasure must be buried nearby, where they located it on the map – and this time he succumbs to temptation, digging for a while until his ‘conscience’ strikes him again and he hurries on to Look-out Hill (p. 180-1). Even here he finds himself revelling in the pleasure of seeing the island laid out below exactly as he and the other children conceived it, and realising that ‘it was the map itself come beautifully and marvellously true’ (p. 181). In the face of this beauty, the need to arm himself with ‘information of immense stragetical (or was it strategical?) importance’ (pp. 181-2) seems only supplementary to the pleasure of simply living in the present. For a while, in fact, he completely forgets his patriarchal role as the male scout on whom his family depends, enraptured by another assault on his senses, beginning with the ‘slow lazy rhythm’ of waves breaking on the shore:

Guy listened to this music crashing and echoing round the coast, and stared in delight, forgetful of danger, at the rippling water, which, though near at hand crested with tiny waves, in the distance seemed so smooth and blue that he could scarcely tell where the sea ended and sky began. (p. 182)

Throughout his adventure, then, Guy finds himself torn between the vision of the fairy tale forest afforded to Martin, the sensory delight afforded to Elizabeth, and his responsibility as the male protector of women and children, who must set aside visions and pleasures for practical ends. The sight of the approaching canoes of the Pacific Islanders recalls him to his position within the patriarchy, so that he starts taking practical measures – ‘he took bearings’ (p. 182) – in an effort to judge how far away they are and how much time he has to warn the others about them. Patriarchal values, however, have just as great a tendency to lapse into fantasy as a delight in one’s physical surroundings, or a conviction that another, more beautiful universe exists ‘both inside and outside the forest he saw’. As he watches the canoes Guy is seized by an impulse to attack them all by himself, like a rogue bull; but he comes back to earth with a bump when he suddenly realises that even ‘he and old Rex’ together ‘would be hard put to it to protect those youngsters’, Martin and Elizabeth – his twin sister being relegated to the status of youngster ‘by virtue of her sex’ (p. 183). He hurries back to the cabin, and after that all his various fantasies get swept away by the urgent need to defend their stronghold against both pirates and Pacific Islanders. During the siege, Elizabeth’s relative ‘youth’ too gets forgotten, and she takes up a musket with just as much confidence and skill as the boys.

Guy’s wavering between the values of the child Martin, his sister Elizabeth, and his older brother Rex, encapsulates the experience of reading The Happy Mariners, which slips easily between sophisticated descriptions of bodily responses to the sea and the island and passages of comic melodrama, like the absurd behaviour of the pirates Bill Murder and Nautical Tallboy in Chapter Twelve; between moments of life-and-death urgency, like Guy’s race to inform his siblings of the Islanders’ approach, and moments of outright fantasy, like the sudden arrival of the wooden cuckoo from Martin’s cuckoo clock at the exact moment when she is needed to transport the children from island to ship at the end of their island adventure. Bullett’s point, it would seem, is that all these ingredients play an active part in the lives of adults as well as of children; a view confirmed by the fact that the children are as much influenced in their thinking by their businessman father as they are by their reading. Claims that one or other set of values belongs exclusively to children or to adults, to boys or to girls, seem to be undermined by the shared nature of so many of the children’s experiences; though the novel also pays due attention to the pressure on boys and girls to adopt exclusively masculine or feminine habits, on children to ‘grow out of’ their weakness and imaginative playfulness, and on everyone to pay less attention to the delight of the moment than to the useful plans they ought to be making for the future. Bullett’s alertness to this pressure lends the novel an atmosphere of gentle mournfulness – the children must surely succumb to such pressure at some point – despite its seeming endorsement of bodily and imaginative pleasures over the demands of duty and convention.

Running through the novel is another theme to which Hodge’s picture, ‘Night in the Forest’, alerts us: cats. I mentioned before that Martin’s favourite companion, besides the wooden cuckoo in his cuckoo clock, is the cat Fandy; and somehow Fandy pervades the children’s adventures with his presence. He accompanies them on the visit to the pond in the brick field which opens the novel, sitting near them ‘languidly washing his face’ as they discuss the island in the pond that inspires their map. On the map, the island takes on the shape of a ‘crouching leopard’, so that all events within its confines could be said to exist within the confines of a feline body. The absence of the Fandy cat and the cuckoo clock from the ship (Martin drops the clock as he climbs on board) is what makes the youngest Robinson wish to go home (pp. 59-60), and the discovery that the cat is in fact on board is what decides him to stay (‘Martin was delighted to have Fandy with him again, and he said no more about wanting to go home’, p. 65) – in spite of the fact that Fandy gave them all a fright with his gleaming eyes in the dark of the hold (pp. 63-4). The loss of Fandy on the island makes Martin miserable again, and it’s in search of Fandy that he sets off on his journey into the Forest of Fairy Tales, where he finds the cat again in the house of Cinderella, as if the island had always been the cat’s home (or one of them). Later, when Bill Murder creeps into the log cabin and prepares to stab Guy, Fandy jumps on him ‘from his hiding-place in the shadows’ and scratches his face ‘quickly and furiously with all his sharp claws at once’, thus saving Guy’s life and perhaps the lives of the other children. After this the cat recedes into the background for a while, reappearing at the precise moment when the cuckoo arrives to carry them back to the ship, when Martin points him out sitting on the beach nearby, ‘unconcernedly washing his face’ (p. 240). On returning to the ship Fandy vanishes once more, before turning up in the final sentences of the novel, ‘busy washing his face’ again; as the narrator observes, ‘There never was a cleaner cat than Fandy’ (p. 248). Martin’s cat, then, frames the story in at least two senses: he appears at the beginning and the end, and his shape provides the ‘frame’ or outline for the island which lies at the heart of their adventures. In the course of the narrative, he keeps vanishing and reappearing, as if calling in question the laws of physics; and he is sometimes scary (as he is in the hold) and sometimes heroic (as he is in the log cabin), as unconcerned about being consistent as he is about being always present.

Which brings us back to Hodges’s illustration, ‘Night in the Forest’. The picture shows the children by a fire in the forest at night surrounded by wild animals, the same wild animals they earlier insisted should be present on their island of adventure. Long before night fell, they encountered similar animals in the jungle: ‘once a huge yellow beast sprang out of its hiding-place into their path, stood for an instant grinning and glaring at them and lashing its tail, and then loped off with an angry laugh’ (pp. 108-9). Rex claims that this beast is a hyena – presumably because of its laugh – but its capacity for springing out of hiding-places and its glaring eyes might remind us of Fandy. Elizabeth seeks to defuse the fears the hyena inspires by reminding the others they have made it up: ‘Of course we did say there’d be wild beasts, when we drew the map. So we’ve only ourselves to thank for it. But I hope they won’t be too wild’ (p. 109). But more beasts emerge after nightfall, when only Rex and Guy are awake, all of them definitely ‘too wild’: first a ‘sleek hissing snake’ (p. 116), then ‘distant shapes’ beyond the firelight, at one point distinguishable as ‘a prowling beast of prey, a spotted yellow thing, lithe and sinuous, baring its cruel fangs and sniffing the human scent’ (p. 117). This creature’s spots and sinuous body evoke a leopard, like the one that inspired the shape of the island, and the impression is reinforced later when the boys see ‘a huge black cat-like creature with blazing emerald eyes’ (p. 118) approaching the fire, which Rex fights off with a blazing branch in time-honoured hero fashion, like Mowgli fighting off Shere Khan. Hodges’s picture shows the beasts as lithe black cats, despite Bullett’s later reference to them as ‘howling’ (p. 121), and the feline ears he gives them reappear in Tolkien’s drawing of the trolls.

What Hodges’s picture does not show is how the beasts are finally dispersed. ‘Suddenly,’ Bullett tells us,

There was a stir among the beasts, a flicker of fear in the bright cruel eyes. A heavy pad-pad, a mighty earth-shaking roar, and into their midst leapt a huge lion. The boys, transfixed with fear, sat for one instant staring at the creature, saw it leap upon its prey and plunge its claws into the soft fur. What animal it had chosen they could not discern; they could only see that it was almost as big as the lion itself, and they gave a gasp of astonishment to see the lion, like a monstrous cat, take up the struggling creature in its jaws and carry it away without effort as though it had been a mouse. All the other animals had fled, and now the lion was gone, and it was unlikely, said Rex, that he would bother to visit them again. (p. 121)

The beasts that threaten the children, then, and the beast that scares them off, are both clearly modelled on cats, and hence on Fandy. Disappearing and reappearing throughout the text, sometimes as a terrifying threat, sometimes as a protective guardian, always implicitly present even when the narrator fails to mention him for many pages at a time, Martin’s animal companion embodies the workings of the unconscious better, perhaps, than any other component of the novel. Even the lion that saves the children remains ambiguous in its motives. After it leaves with ‘the struggling creature in its jaws’ Rex is not wholly sure it will not come back to eat them, too: ‘Even lions are afraid of fire’, he tells Guy reassuringly, but adds a qualification: ‘I expect’ (p. 121). The simple adventures undergone by the children, where goodies are goodies and baddies are baddies, hides another world in which the distinction is not so clear, in which lions are not simple allegories of imperial might or divine strength, love and wisdom.

The appearance of the lion in the forest, just after the moment pictured by Hodges in his illustration, is perhaps the episode in the book with clearest associations with the work of C. S. Lewis. Lewis’s allegorical representation of Christ (or Christ’s qualities) in the Narnia books is of course the great lion Aslan; and Aslan has a way of appearing and disappearing unexpectedly, leaving humans and sentient animals for long periods to fend for themselves; after all, he’s ‘not like a tame lion’, as Mr Beaver tells the child protagonists in The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe (1950).[9] He’s also liable to reappear in different guises; for instance, in Prince Caspian (1951) he is at first invisible to all the child protagonists except Lucy, and in The Voyage of the Dawn Treader (1952) he manifests himself successively as a picture in a book (p. 133), an albatross (pp. 158-9) and a lamb (pp. 208-9).[10] Closest to Bullett’s cat theme is the version of Aslan in The Horse and his Boy (1954), which sees the great beast transform into several felines of different sizes, from the two or more lions who first bring Shasta and Aravis together (pp. 29-32) to the solitary lion who chases Shasta and Bree to the Hermit’s garden (pp. 128-9) or the friendly cat who comforts Shasta among the tombs (‘big and very solemn […] Its eyes made you think it knew secrets it would not tell’, p. 80).[11] In this, Lewis’s version of the Thousand and One Nights, Aslan is a recurrent but various presence, exactly as Fandy is in The Happy Mariners.

There are other echoes of Lewis’s work in Bullett’s novel. The ship that begins as a miniature version of itself anticipates Lewis’s ship the Dawn Treader, which the children in that book first encounter as a picture on a wall. That ship, too, becomes full size by magic after a destructive act, in this case a furious attack by a boy called Eustace. ‘I’ll smash the rotten thing,’ Eustace cries as he rushes at the picture (p. 14), but in doing so he hurls the child protagonists into the world of Narnia, just as Elizabeth’s well-cast stone, which breaks the bottle, hurls Bullett’s child protagonists into the world of their dreams. The island where dreams come true, meanwhile, finds an echo in The Voyage of the Dawn Treader, where the protagonists come across a ‘Dark Island’ in which all dreams, including nightmares, are made real; something Lewis represents as the worst of horrors: ‘Do you hear what I say? This is where dreams – dreams, do you understand – come to life, become real. Not daydreams: dreams’ (p. 156); an idea the crew of the Dawn Treader find they cannot face. Guy’s wrestle with his conscience on the way to Look-Out Hill finds echoes in several Narnia books, in which children get tempted in various ways and either succumb to temptation or successfully resist it. Diggory in The Magician’s Nephew (1955), does both, first releasing an evil witch from an age-long enchantment, then successfully resisting her blandishments in a Narnian Garden of Eden.

Most strikingly of all, perhaps, Bullett’s young Martin learns in the Forest of Fairy Tales that the place resembles a series of boxes of the sort widely known as Chinese boxes. His friend Cinderella calls these boxes ‘Indian’, but explains what they are with helpful clarity:

‘It’s like those Indian boxes,’ she said, ‘all different sizes, one inside the other. The forest of firs was like the first box; inside that was the snow country; and inside the snow country was the little town of moonshine where I live. The funny thing is, that they get bigger instead of getting smaller. And the one in the middle is biggest of all.’ (p. 168)

The passage, of course, foreshadows the final Narnian chronicle, The Last Battle (1956), in which Lewis’s children find their way to a succession of new worlds, ‘world within world, Narnia within Narnia’, like an onion, ‘except that as you go in and in, each circle is larger than the last’ (p. 181).[12] Once again, these echoes of Bullett’s novel in the work of Lewis seem to me more than coincidental, and I find myself suspecting that Tolkien’s friend may have known it better than Tolkien himself.

It seems to me too, however, that Bullett’s cats have very different connotations from Lewis’s Aslan. My suspicion is based on another work by Bullett, a collection of poems he published as an undergraduate at Cambridge under the title Mice and Other Poems (1921), only six years before the first version of The Happy Mariners. In his introduction to Mice and Other Poems, the critic and poet Arthur Quiller-Couch pointed out that many young men who had fought in the Great War turned to writing poetry, and that their verse – including the verse contained in ‘this pamphlet’ – often displays a not unnatural ‘bitterness of resentment’.[13] The first poem in Bullett’s collection both explains its title and manifests the ‘bitterness of resentment’ born from the horrors of industrialised warfare. Here it is:

Mice

I see the broken bodies of women and men,
Temples of God ruined; I see the claws
Of sinister Fate, from the reach of whose feline paws
Never are safe the bodies of women and men.

Almighty Cat, it sits on the Throne of the World,
With paw outstretched, grinning at us, the mice,
Who play our trivial games of virtue and vice,
And pray—to That which sits on the Throne of the World!

From our beginning till all is over and done,
Unwitting who watches, pursuing our personal ends,
Hither and thither we scamper… The paw descends;
The paw descends and all is over and done.

In this early poem, written during or soon after his experience of combat in the Great War, cats embody an indifferent Fate wholly unlike the stern but cheerful lion-god of the Narnian chronicles; the sort of Fate that could condone casual slaughter on an industrial scale. In his essay Dreaming Bullett directly associates this sort of nightmare-cat with army life, referring to a dream of his in which a ‘cat-faced demon […] dressed in military uniform with all his buttons hideously shining, leaped out of a boiled egg at the tap of my spoon and ordered me to stand to attention’ (p. 12). The presence of war lurks in the background of The Happy Mariners, too. Phineas Dyke, the Elizabethan sailor who wakes from long sleep aboard Elizabeth’s ship, is the only survivor of a naval action in which all his fellow combatants died, friends and enemies alike, leaving him in sole charge of the caravel. Sleep fell on him as soon as the action ended, and his extended period of unconsciousness could be read as a kind of self-induced coma, offering a welcome escape into dreams from the horrors of war at sea. The cats in the novel, more often friendly and protective than terrifying, could represent the sort of softening or mellowing which Arthur Quiller-Couch hopes will take place in the young soldier-poets who have endured so much. But their terrifying aspect lingers, and the belligerent tendencies of the three boys in Bullett’s novel may have added to the melancholy undertones of the novel, especially for an adult reader who remembered the massive loss of young male life (and female too, as ‘Mice’ reminds us) in Flanders and France. These boys are already shaping up to provide perfect cannon fodder for the next outbreak of global warfare in 1939.

But I’d like to end with a more cheerful thought on Hodge’s illustration, ‘Night in the Forest’. Bullett’s essay, Dreaming, intersects in several ways with his novel for children, most obviously in its various lyrical meditations on the possible ways of viewing dreams. In the first section of the essay, Bullett tells us about his childhood theory that every person consists in fact of two people, each of whom is awake when the other is asleep; consciousness and dreams, according to this theory, have equal value, which means that Elizabeth’s dream life as captain and queen is as valid as her waking life as a girl from suburbia. In the second section, Bullett suggests that a person’s dream life exists in seamless continuity with their waking life, both being made up of identical elements, memory and thought, but in different proportions, with organising thought being almost absent from dream, while by contrast organising thought dominates any act of conscious recollection. A daydream or reverie, for Bullett, inhabits a liminal place between waking and dreaming, and its essential quality, translated into visual terms, most closely resembles ‘that quivering glaze of heat, colourless and transparent, that we sometimes see in summertime rising liquidly from the dry ground’; while in terms of hearing it invokes ‘the warm hum – the very voice of magic – with which sun-saturated woods are filled at noon’ (p. 18). Lying in such woods under such conditions – on a hot day in summer, with the trees rendered ‘at once more bright and less solid than reality’ – a person may entertain ‘a long procession of fancies’, among others that what we take to be ‘real’ is in fact no more stable or rational than what we take to be imaginary. This perception, if applied to the dream- or play-world of the island – made up as it is of memories – and the ‘real’ world from which it offers an escape, would again suggest that neither is more real or concrete than the other, each being susceptible to conditions that render them ‘less solid than reality’; conditions that include the darkness of midnight as well as summertime heat ‘rising liquidly from the dry ground’ at noon.  Elizabeth’s experiences on the ship and the island, in other words, are as positively real and valid a component of her memory – and of the personality of which her memory forms an essential part – as any of the seemingly inflexible rules and reasons imposed on her by education and convention. Both are equally real, while at the same time both form part of the same ‘long procession of fancies’. The same is true of Martin’s experiences in the Fairy-Tale Forest, or of Guy’s delight in his senses as he hurries through the woods or stands on Look-Out Hill, exulting in the sight and sound of the waves breaking on the shore. There is hope, in other words, that Elizabeth and her brothers will emerge from the woods of their island more ‘equal’, at least in each other’s eyes, than they were when they first went in. Their shared experience there, which is as real as their time in the suburban house Hodges pictures at the beginning and end of Bullett’s narrative, makes them comrades in spite of the accidents of gender, age, or personal disposition.

To adopt another idea from C. S. Lewis – that of the Wood Between the Worlds in The Magician’s Nephew, which is full of ponds (like the pond in the brick field where the Robinsons’ adventure started) that offer gateways into other worlds – the children may possibly emerge from the woods on the island into a world which is slightly better than the world that spawned the Great War. We know from history, of course, that they did not, and that the rise of Nazism and the Second World War were just around the corner. But the hope endured, given shape and legal form by the Equal Franchise Act of 1928. So when we look at Tolkien’s drawing of the trolls in the woods, we might think about Bullett’s woods as pictured by Hodges in The Happy Mariners, the woods of daydream in Bullett’s essay on Dreaming, and Lewis’s Wood Between the Worlds; and we might take this ‘long procession of fancies’ as an invitation to go wandering in the woods of our own waking and sleeping dreams, from which we too might emerge with our hopes intact – and possibly even rendered a little more accessible.

NOTES

[1] My edition of The Hobbit is the 50th Anniversary edition (London and Sydney: Unwin Hyman, 1987), and the picture of the trolls can be found on p. 43.

[2] See Spufford, The Child That Books Built ( London: Faber and Faber, 2003), pp. 64-71.

[3] Spufford mentions the non-authoritative nature of Tolkien’s illustrations (for himself as a child) in The Child That Books Built, p. 71: ‘Illustrations – I decided – were limitations’. I felt the same way about some books but not about others; Pauline Baynes’s illustrations for the Narnia books, for instance, seemed to me of a piece with the text, and indispensable.

[4] All references in this post are to Bullett, The Happy Mariners, illustrated by C. Walter Hodges (London: J. M. Dent and Sons, 1956).

[5] See Humphrey Carpenter, The Inklings: C. S. Lewis, J. R. R. Tolkien, Charles Williams and Their Friends (London: Unwin Paperbacks, 1982).

[6] There and Back Again is of course the subtitle of Tolkien’s novel.

[7] Quoted from Barrie, Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens and Peter and Wendy, Oxford World’s Classics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).

[8] Bullett’s keen interest in and admiration for Freud are clearly evident in his essay Dreaming, published as a pamphlet in 1928, the year after The Spanish Caravel (The Happy Mariners). The complete pamphlet can be found here: https://archive.org/details/dli.ernet.470223/mode/2up.

[9] Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, Puffin Books (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1959), p. 166.

[10] Lewis, The Voyage of the Dawn Treader, Puffin Books (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1965).

[11] Lewis, The Horse and His Boy (London: Geoffrey Bles, 1959).

[12] Lewis, The Last Battle (London: The Bodley Head, 1958).

[13] References are to The Project Gutenberg eBook of Mice and Other Poems, transcribed from the Cambridge University Press edition of 1921.

Night Scenes in Peake and Masefield

One of the most memorable moments in Mervyn Peake’s Gormenghast (1950) comes when the banished servant Flay returns to the castle in secret to continue his faithful vigil over its masters, the Groan family, and above all the young heir to the castle, Titus Groan. At one point in his nocturnal wanderings through abandoned halls and empty corridors, Flay comes across a ‘small cloistered quadrangle’ (p. 639), in the middle of which grows a thorn tree whose silhouette strikes him as strange.[1] Gradually, as the dawn begins to break, he begins to understand the reason for this strangeness. The tree conceals the figure of Steerpike, Gormenghast’s Master of Ritual and (in Flay’s view) the deadliest enemy of the House of Groan. Flay’s discovery of Steerpike leads first to Steerpike’s exposure as a murderer (he has hidden the skeletons of Titus’s two aunts in a forgotten room where he can gloat over them) and afterwards to Flay’s own death. The passage in which he finds him, then, is a turning point in the novel, and deserves to be quoted in full as a masterpiece of atmospheric writing.

Here it is:

In the centre of the quadrangle was a thorn tree, and [Flay’s] eyes turned to the pitchy silhouette of that part of it that cut across the yellow of the sunrise. His familiarity with the shape of the old tree caused him to stare more intently at the rough and branching stem. It seemed thicker than usual. He could only see with any clarity that portion of its bole that crossed the sunrise. It appeared to have changed its outline. It was as though something were leaning against it and adding a little to its bulk. He crouched so that still more of the unfamiliar shape came into view, for the upper part was criss-crossed with branches. As his vision was lowered and he commanded a clearer view beneath the overhanging boughs his muscles became tense for it seemed that against the livid strip of sky – which threw everything else both on the earth and in the air into yet richer blackness – it seemed – that against this livid strip the unfamiliar outline on the left of the stem was narrowing to something the shape of a neck. He got silently to his knee and then, lowering his head and lifting his eyes, he obtained an uninterrupted view of Steerpike’s profile. His body and the back of his head were glued together as though he and the tree had grown up as one thing from the ground.

And that was all there was. The universal darkness above and below. The horizontal stream of saffron yellow and, like a rough bridge that joined the upper darkness to the lower, the silhouette of the ragged thorn stem, with the profile of a face among the stems.

What was he doing there in the darkness alone and motionless? (pp. 639-640)

The genius of the passage lies in its use of light and dark to map the slow revelation of Steerpike’s presence. Piece by piece Flay assembles the puzzle, in the process transforming the familiar thorn into something uncanny – a tree with a human body growing out of it – so that the naming of Steerpike only adds to the young man’s unsettling qualities. For much of the passage the reader’s attention is engaged with the particular difficulties of examining the tree in the dimness of the quadrangle; everything else in Peake’s narrative is held in suspension, waiting until the significance or otherwise of this long, slow process of decipherment should be unveiled and the mechanism of plot be set in motion once again.

There are many such moments in Peake’s novel, moments that invite us to set aside the unfolding drama as we seek with one character or another to negotiate some specific aspect of the ever-changing landscape of Gormenghast Castle. In this passage, Steerpike is for a while no longer a villain – not even to Flay, the man who has reason to hate him most, since he was responsible for Flay’s exile. Nor is he the ex-kitchen boy who rose to be Master of Ritual. He is an enigma, detached from grand or petty narratives of all kinds, fascinating precisely by virtue of being, first, an unknown object spotted in the dark, then a hybrid of tree and man, ‘alone and motionless’, his thoughts more completely hidden than his body. For as long as the passage lasts, he and Flay exist only as rivals locked in a physical and psychological duel, Flay deriving an advantage from Steerpike’s ignorance of his presence, Steerpike deriving a greater advantage from his uncanny relationship to the tree and to the ‘universal darkness’ of the quadrangle and the castle it metonymically represents.[2] At each such moment in the novel, the characters involved become extensions of their setting, doing homage to Gormenghast’s quasi-sentient vastness by their total absorption in the immediate problems or wonders it presents them with. Each of these moments contributes another potent strand to the developing myth of the castle, while the characters themselves gain a mythic dimension thanks to their place within the titanic structure.

In this passage, Steerpike strikes Flay for the first time not as an intruder but as an indigenous denizen of the castle’s gloomy interstices, a being who springs from between its stones just as the tree does; this despite Flay’s conviction that the young man is a deep-dyed traitor to its ruling dynasty, which Flay continues to serve despite his banishment. The young man’s appearance of being wholly at home in the darkness of the quadrangle, and of being able to transform something familiar (the tree) into a tool to advance his hidden purposes, anticipates the final section of the novel, in which Steerpike wanders Gormenghast’s attics, roofscapes, cellars and staircases as at once an outcast and the castle’s deadly alternative monarch, the Arch-fiend of Peake’s secondary world. In that final section of the book, Steerpike’s unrivalled familiarity with the building’s topography gives him an unsettling advantage over his pursuers, the Groans, allowing him to reign unchallenged in spaces of the building to which its nominal rulers have never penetrated. The power this knowledge gives him is something he anticipates from the moment when his murder of the aunts has been discovered. At that point he makes the spontaneous decision to embrace the situation – that is, to relish his sudden fall and the terrifying aura with which it invests him, in a world where tradition elicits absolute obedience:

If it was no longer possible for him to wear, one day, the legitimate crown of Gormenghast, there was still the dark and terrible domain – the subterranean labyrinth – the lairs and warrens where, monarch of darkness like Satan himself, he could wear undisputed a crown no less imperial. (p. 658)

The echo of Milton’s celebrated line here, uttered by Satan in Paradise Lost – ‘Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven’ – is unmistakable.[3] From this point onwards, Steerpike is ‘no less imperial’ than Titus himself or his formidable mother, the Countess Gertrude, having fulfilled his ambition to attain, in a sense, the castle’s crown; the fact that his is an illegitimate version of that crown only enhances his perverse enjoyment of it. The scene at the thorn tree, like a painting of the Tree of Life defiled by the presence of the human-headed Serpent, pre-empts this passionate embrace of perversity, when Steerpike becomes an embodiment of the fastness at the centre of Peake’s imaginative universe.

*****

First edition of Lost Endeavour, Frontispiece by Stephen Remi, showing Little Theo on the left and Charles Harding on the right.

I was reading one of John Masefield’s novels recently – a strange, visionary book called Lost Endeavour (1910) – when I came across a passage which seemed to me to foreshadow the passage with the thorn tree. It’s from one of Masefield’s intense set-pieces: a scene in which a small band of pirates finds itself surrounded by a war party of indigenous Americans on a hill in the wilderness at night. Knowing they are surrounded, and believing that the war party will attack at dawn, the pirates decide that one of their number must leave the hilltop to fetch water if they are to survive the night. An enslaved boy of sixteen whom they happen to have met, and who knows the land as none of the rest do, volunteers for the mission. On his way back from filling their water bottles at a stream, he sees something ahead of him which may or may not be a threat, or a place where a threat is hiding. This is where my next passage begins:

What was the black thing? Was it a thicket of briars, or a patch of sumach, or an Indian grave-heap? I could not be sure; and it was necessary that I should be sure. I lay down flat upon the ground, so as to get its upper edge, if it had one, defined against the stars and the comparative lightness of the lower heaven. Looking at it thus, with my head flat upon the ground, I thought it must be the bulk of a vast uprooted tree, probably much rotted and overgrown. That it was a tree was evident an instant later, when, in a puff of air, I caught the scent of wild honey from some crevice in its bark.

Now it was always my plan when alone in the woods to approach such places from the flank, and never directly from the front. One never knows what may be hiding on the further side. One might stir up a bee’s nest, or a honey-hunting bear, or a wild-cat, if one approaches an old log too rashly, and none of these three is polite when disturbed. And as I looked at this log, with a knop or swelling in its surface well defined against a star, something very slowly rose up from behind it, gradually hiding not only that star but several others. It rose up very slowly, so slowly that I knew that it could be no animal. As it rose it defined itself. Something stuck out from it at right angles. It was round, with something sticking out from it; it was something with eyes and a brain; it was looking at the ground where I lay. It was an Indian with eagle feathers in his hair. I got a sniff of his war-grease intermixed with the perfume of the honey. For an instant we stared at each other through the darkness. We were not five yards from each other. If we had made ‘long arms’ we might have touched. What was I to do now? Did he see me or did he not see me; and if he saw me, what was he going to do; and if he did not see me, how was I to get past the log while he was there? Did he see me? I concluded that he could not help it, since my face, in spite of my tan, was pretty white against the ground. But if he saw me he made no least sign, no least noise. He was like some great fungus thrust up suddenly from the log. He had the best cards; it was for him to call the game. (pp. 103-105).[4]

The parallels between this passage and Peake’s are worth considering in detail. First, the topography of the incidents they examine. Both incidents are shaped by their setting: the cloistered quadrangle, implicitly giving Flay a column to hide behind, or at least a shadowed border to hide in as he surveys the thorn tree; the steep hill with water at the bottom which places Charles below the tree trunk as he approaches it, giving him a greater disadvantage in relation to whatever it may conceal. Both take place at night, with the limitations on vision this imposes. Both passages involve the inspection of a tree, an inspection that requires a careful adjustment of position (Flay kneels and lowers his head, Charles lies on the ground) to make use of all available light (the yellow sunrise in Peake’s passage, the stars in Masefield’s). In both cases the risks involved in this inspection are considerable; the banished Flay, if noticed by a denizen of the castle, risks death, while Charles expects to be hurt or killed if the tree conceals any of the creatures he fears. In each case, the human being revealed by the inspection seems uncannily fused with a tree-bole – Steerpike as its extension, the nameless warrior as a fungal growth on its decaying surface. There’s therefore a fantastic atmosphere about both passages. At the beginning of each, the tree could harbour anything at all; by the end what it harbours has become strangely involved with the adjacent vegetation. In each case, too, the human being next to the tree seems by the end to have the initiative. Flay has no idea what Steerpike is doing in the quadrangle or what he might do next, while Charles Harding has no idea if the warrior has seen him or what he might do if he has. As a result Flay and Charles feel able only to react to, not act upon, the circumstances in which they find themselves. Power lies with the man they are watching, despite the fact that he is, or possibly may be, unaware that he is being watched.

Cowboy ambushed by native American warrior, by Stanley L. Wood, one of Peake’s favourite artists as a boy.

Having looked at the immediate practicalities of the situation in each case, we might consider, too, the point of view adopted in each passage within the context of the novel as a whole. Flay is an outcast from the castle, summarily banished by the Countess of Groan after a lifetime of faithful service. Charles Harding too is an exile and an outcast, having been enslaved in Britain at fourteen and sold in America, so that his common cause with the pirates – forced on him by circumstance – renders him subject by law to aggressive punitive measures. After Flay’s banishment he learns the ways of the woods, living in a cave like Stevenson’s Ben Gunn and discovering an aptitude for survival and a love of the natural environment. Charles, too, learns the ways of the woods, and describes himself as a woodsman, which is why he volunteers for the mission of fetching water; he knows full well the pirates would not last more than a few seconds in the wilderness he has made his home. Charles’s familiarity with this environment also gives him an appreciation for the skills of the native Americans, who know it so much better than he does. His status as an enslaved person, too, means that he does not look on the so-called ‘Indians’ from a wholly colonial perspective; they are free men, as he is not, their skills are greater than his, and in both ways they have him at an advantage. Their superiority is implied by the final sentence of the passage, in which the Indian behind the fallen tree is said to be holding ‘the best cards’, as if he and Charles were engaged in a game played for the highest stakes, with the Indian best placed to win. Masefield is careful, however, to show Charles as having in some measure adopted the perspective of the slaveowner who bought him, worrying about how his ‘master’ is coping without his help, worrying about the punishments he himself may face if he deserts his ‘owner’, and so on. Flay too takes the perspective of the ‘legitimate’ castle authorities, the House of Groan, even though it was they who sent him into exile without pausing a moment to consider his long and faithful service. In the previous novel, Titus Groan (1946), Flay worried constantly in exile about how his master, the old Earl who was Titus’s father, would manage without his services, and in the thorn tree scene he is actively engaged in acting on behalf of the Earl’s son, Titus. At the same time, he has a sense that Steerpike has real power over both himself and the House of Groan. In order to move around the castle freely, despite his banished status, Flay has made himself familiar with its obscurer corridors; but his observation of Steerpike reveals that the younger man has made an even more thorough study of the castle’s layout, though Flay’s hatred for Steerpike prevents him from admiring the extent of this knowledge.

Flay and Charles, in other words, are clearly instruments of a certain power structure founded on radical inequality between different perceived orders or categories of human being. Both also embody the weakness of this structure: Charles because of his admiration and partial understanding of the native Americans, Flay because of his evident fear of Steerpike as a force capable of toppling his ‘masters’. Flay and Charles inhabit unjust, inefficient hegemonies sustained by violence, and recognise the presence in their worlds of potent counter-forces (the ‘traitor’ Steerpike, the native American warriors) dedicated to damaging or destroying those hegemonies through their unrivalled mastery of a certain space (the castle, the wilderness). The primacy of that space in each passage – the quadrangle in the pre-dawn darkness, the hill at night – places the advantage in the court of those counter-forces. The quadrangle and the hill become locations in which imperial rule finds itself suspended, challenged, partly undermined, reflecting the historical moment when each writer was writing, at different stages in the long, slow decline of the British Empire.

This decline is driven by internal contradictions. We’ve noted how the scene involving Steerpike marks the beginning of his transition from authority figure within the hegemony – the Master of Ritual, with a powerful hold even over his putative ‘masters’, the House of Groan – to solitary outcast and devilish monarch of the castle’s tracts. Lost Endeavour, too, includes a character who begins with hugely overblown ambitions and ends (as its title suggests) by losing everything he has worked for. The leader of the pirates encountered by Charles is a Spanish sailor called Little Theo, whose name hints at his resemblance to – and later, his aspiration to become – a minor god (theos is ancient Greek for god). In England, Little Theo was Charles’s schoolmaster at a small school; his name was given him, half in mockery and half in admiration, by his pupils, in recognition that there is something powerful about him despite his short stature and humble occupation. Little Theo was enslaved at the same time as his pupil, and this experience – together with what happened after – is suspected by Charles to have driven him half mad. By the time Charles meets him again, not long before our passage, Little Theo has become convinced he is a kind of messiah for the indigenous peoples of the Americas – a figure foretold, he insists, in all New World mythologies. It’s this conviction, sustained by a series of ‘revelations’ that enable him to overcome a string of life-threatening situations, which drives him to become a pirate chief and later to abandon most of his fellow pirates as unworthy partners in his messianic mission. Inevitably – given the historical setting of the novel in the late seventeenth century, the so-called Golden Age of Piracy – this mission comes to nothing; after all, seventeenth- and eighteenth-century history does not record a collective rising of indigenous American people behind a European leader. But the mission’s mere existence lends the narrative a quasi-anticolonial slant which is twisted and warped by the fact that the self-proclaimed rebel against Empire is both white and committed to seizing power for himself. The parallels with Steerpike, whose claims to set himself against the elitism of the Groans are effectively nullified by his ambition to rule Gormenghast in their place, are clear enough. So is the fact that both aspiring rulers find themselves undone by the contradictions in their stances. The worlds they inhabit – late seventeenth-century Britain and America, Gormenghast Castle – do not yet offer any serious alternative to the status quo. Steerpike and Little Theo pose as rebels against the powers-that-be, but can only envisage combatting those powers by replicating the inequalities that sparked off their rebellions. They are loners – Steerpike has no friends, Little Theo has contempt for his pirate companions – which makes them weak, despite their conviction of their own power (and Little Theo’s weakness is underlined by the fact that he finds himself powerless when attacked by the indigenous people he intends to rule; he is wounded in the dawn attack on the hill). Both, then, embody the contradictions of the power structures they seek to subvert.

To summarize what I’ve said so far: the greatness of the two long passages I’ve quoted springs from the intensity of their focus on one particular time and place in the unfolding narrative of which they are part. The moment in question constitutes a pause in the action, when for a while everything hangs in the balance. The time is circumscribed in each case by the approach of dawn, when the war party is expected to strike, when what hides beside the thorn tree will be fully revealed, and when Steerpike will have enough light to set off for his unknown destination. The topography of the setting is central to both passages. The ‘small cloistered quadrangle’ divides the night into dense, quasi-abstract patches of light and dark, while the thorn tree makes of Steerpike something weird, an amalgam of tree and man which reinforces the sense that he has some eerie biological connection to Gormenghast castle. The fallen log in the second passage is rendered intensely significant by the darkness of the hillside, which both conceals whatever is behind it and renders weird the slow, silent rising of the warrior from that concealment. In both cases, the inner life of the person next to the standing or fallen tree is just as obscure after his identity has been revealed as it was beforehand. This means that the person in question retains at the end a close association with the place described in the passage, and derives from that place a kind of power he would not otherwise have had. Place and person are fused for a while in these passages, and the implications of this fusion remain unknown as they draw to a close.

Robert Louis Stevenson, admired by both Masefield and Peake.

This laying aside of (nearly) all considerations but those of the immediate present puts me in mind of Robert Louis Stevenson’s famous essay ‘A Gossip on Romance’, which seeks to explain his fascination with what we now call thrillers or adventure stories, as against novels of ‘character’, ‘drama’ or ‘thought’.[5] For Stevenson, reading a book should be an experience both ‘absorbing and voluptuous’, taking the reader ‘clean out of ourselves’ while reading, and afterwards leaving behind the ‘busiest, kaleidoscopic dance of images’ which render the reader ‘incapable of sleep or of continuous thought’. For him, place is central to the best kind of action narrative packed with the sort of focussed, all-consuming passages he thirsts after. Such narratives intensify the haunting effect of certain places by supplying a plot full of ‘fit and striking incident’ that depends entirely on the specific characteristics of those places and could not be set anywhere else. While we are focused on each successive incident, we should be so preoccupied with place and its role in unfolding events that we set aside all considerations of morality; after all, Stevenson points out,

There is a vast deal in life and letters both which is not immoral, but simply a-moral; […] where the interest turns, not upon what a man shall choose to do, but on how he manages to do it; not on the passionate slips and hesitations of the conscience, but on the problems of the body and of the practical intelligence, in clean, open-air adventure, the shock of arms or the diplomacy of life.

Such narratives of circumstance and incident, then, involve a temporary suspension of the mind from active engagement with ethics, politics or philosophy. The only questions that matter for as long as they last are questions as to what may happen next and how it may unfold. This state of suspension bears some resemblance to the period of hesitation identified by Tzvetan Todorov as a key characteristic of the Fantastic in literature: a temporary uncertainty in the reader’s mind over whether the incidents we are reading about (in this case, seemingly impossible incidents) may be understood as actually happening in the world of the story, or as an illusion imposed on the protagonist by his mental state or by some trickery of the light or of another person.[6] The impossible incident is all that matters for the time being, and the multitude of possible explanations for it – together with the refusal to choose any one of those explanations for the time being – lends it an astonishing, vertiginous power over the mind of the reader. For Stevenson, as for Todorov, the period of suspension or hesitation is infinitely productive, allowing ‘whole vistas of secondary stories, besides the one in hand’ to radiate forth, ‘as they radiate from a striking particular in life’. Such a plenitude of possibility, for him, will make any reader ‘as happy as a reader has a right to be’.

The two passages I’ve set side by side offer Stevenson’s experience of suspension in ample measure. Both are intensely concerned with ‘problems of the body’ – indeed, they render the body itself problematic as Steerpike’s head and back seem to emerge from the tree and the warrior’s head becomes a fungal growth. Masefield’s involves what Stevenson terms ‘clean, open-air adventure’, and while Peake’s is nominally set indoors, the profusion of strange vistas, feral creatures and organic growths in Gormenghast castle give it the wildness of a series of undiscovered caves – though this wildness is not exactly ‘open-air’.  The passages also embody a specific quality in both Peake’s and Masefield’s narratives. In both, place is the focus, together with the time at which the protagonist and the reader come in contact with that place. During each successive incident or set-piece in both narratives – and there are many of them – a ‘vista’ of possibilities is generated, any one of which would provide a richly satisfying story; and the fact that there is for a while this vista renders the incident from which they might spring more potent than any one of those stories once it has started to be told. For that period of suspension, the reader’s imagination is wholly engaged, and the reader empowered, made equal partner with the writer and the protagonist, thanks to the prose on the printed page. That’s a political situation, I think, and helps explain why Peake’s novels have been so popular with politically sophisticated readers down the years, despite the apparent lack of specifically political elements in those novels. Masefield has not achieved the same level of popularity, but several of his books deserve to be much better known – not least Lost Endeavour, with its thrilling set pieces, its vivid evocation of place, and its knowingly troubled relationship to the imperialist world that gave it birth.

Lost Endeavour, specially bound first edition. The turbaned man on the front is Little Theo.

NOTES

[1] References are to The Gormenghast Trilogy (London: Mandarin, 1992).

[2] The most celebrated reference to ‘universal darkness’ in literature comes from Alexander Pope’s The Dunciad (1727-1743), which describes the collapse of British culture and ends in a universal apocalypse presided over by stupidity, embodied by the goddess Dulness. The final lines run:

Lo! thy dread empire, Chaos! is restor’d;
Light dies before thy uncreating word:
Thy hand, great Anarch! lets the curtain fall;
And universal Darkness buries all.

[3] Milton, Paradise Lost, Book 1, line 42.

[4] Quoted from Lost Endeavour (London etc.: Thomas Nelson and Sons, 1910).

[5] ‘A Gossip on Romance’ can be found in full here: https://electricscotland.com/history/other/EssaysOfRLS09AGossipOnRomancePlusNotes.pdf

[6] See Tzvetan Todorov, The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1975), p. 25.